TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Maxio Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services Reviews & Insights

Score8 out of 10

62 Reviews and Ratings

Maxio Reviews

7 Reviews
Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesInformation Technology & Services6Computer & Network Security1

SaaSOptics doesn't understand its customers and product development is off track

Rating: 3 out of 10
Incentivized

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

SaaSOptics (SO) integrates with our CRM (Salesforce) and our GL accounting software (Quickbooks Online; QBO). I inherited this software from several predecessors before me. SO mainly serves as an intermediary between our CRM and GL to keep track of our customers, send invoices and perform collections and dunning, maintains our revenue and deferred revenue schedules and ARR reporting so we don't have to use Excel. Not having to keep track of all of this in Excel is a huge benefit for us and allows us to delegate the bookings process to a lower level staff member. The automated emails when an invoice becomes past due (or any other time period you set) is helpful as well. SO can also sync sales tax settings from QBO so we properly charge sales tax to our customers.

Pros

  • Integrates with CRM (Salesforce) and accounting software, and keeps our team out of Excel for revenue and deferred revenue
  • Provides assistance with automating our AR collections process
  • The Quickbooks Online (QBO) and SaaSOptics (SO) sales tax integration seems to work well (with the help of a sales tax consultant) and allows us to stay organized enough that we haven’t needed to implement another software like Avalara
  • You can easily export a Transaction List of all transactions in the system
  • You can set up a parent/child relationships to get more accurate ARR reporting at the customer account level and customer count level.
  • The ability to set up and allow customers to make payments by ACH and credit card through the Stripe integration was easy to set up. It does take 2 days for credit card payments to hit your bank account though, and you can’t pass along the credit card fees to your customers (some states don’t allow passing along the fees to customers).

Cons

  • I can barely use the full functionality of the software because of reporting and transaction issues that are not easy to resolve, and appear to be system limitations. For example, the cohort report doesn’t make any sense, the gross renewal and reports are completely inaccurate, and they still haven’t created an accurate, standard MRR and ARR report (order dates before the subscription period could result in overlapping transactions, which will be excluded from the ARR report, so your ARR is understated and you could make uninformed decisions)
  • You cannot renew transactions between customers, which is a total pain. There is very little guidance on how to handle mergers and acquisitions and there has been a significant amount of M&A in the market lately. Their customer support says you need to move the invoices to the new customer in your GL system, but I don’t want to change any historical information that could potentially change our audited financials.
  • It is too easy to make mistakes and not understand or realize where and how the issue was created and how to resolve it
  • There is very limited information (MRR and ARR at End of Month, and Total AR Balance, which isn’t groundbreakingly helpful) you can send from SaaSOptics to Salesforce, and the Salesforce IDs can easily change without you knowing, which stops the information from flowing from SaaSOptics to Salesforce
  • They have a Dropbox functionality to save executed contracts, but I think it would be better to store them in your CRM where the sales, AM, and CS teams can access the docs instead of trying to teach your team members how to us SaaSOptics.
  • They have a Clearbit integration to get more detailed information about your customer, but I haven’t set this up, and am unsure why you would use it if your CRM already imports information from ZoomInfo
  • They don’t have an integration with Bill.com, so I don’t understand how they expect customers to use their expense module
  • There is no need to use their expense module for 606 commissions if you already have a commission software that can handle 606. I haven’t had to implement 606 on the revenue side, but that seems to be a more practical use case.
  • You can’t natively integrate with a customer success software, like ChurnZero. You need to hire a developer or pay more.
  • It is difficult to collaborate and share reports with other parties. Their reports doesn’t export cleanly either and requires additional Excel manipulation. There is no multi-year reporting without creating custom fields and additional data entry. You can’t easily create a bookings report based on the order date or signed date, which could be different than the subscription start date.
  • The granularity of security settings is not great and they don’t help you organize and direct users to use the software. My preference would be to not have any report users in the system.
  • There are poor notifications about invoice issues. For example, our AR invoice email keeps getting unsubscribed when we want to have a copy of the invoice saved in our email to prove it was sent. If an invoice is rejected or kicked back, then you will not know until the invoice becomes past due and you start investigating why your customer hasn’t paid you yet.
  • Invoice template changes impact all previous invoices, which doesn’t make sense and distorts your audit trail. Invoice template changes should only impact the present and future invoices. You also can’t easily add invoice 1 of 8, invoice 2 of 8, etc. You have to have manually type it in the invoice description.
  • The detail for revenue and deferred revenue does not sync to the GL. You have to make a manually summary journal entry once a month.
  • There is no data validation on the billing and shipping state fields so when you run a report of “Sales by State”, you will have uncombined rows for “CA”, “California”, “Ca”, which isn’t helpful as we try to do an economic nexus review for sales tax.

Likelihood to Recommend

SO is helpful for small accounting and finance teams that do not want to manage revenue, deferred revenue schedules, ARR, and customer count in Excel. It is also well-suited for organizations that have very few mergers and acquisitions among their customer base, are not dependent upon the SO projections for FP&A, want to have a more automated AR invoice collections process, and receive payments through credit card and ACH easily.
Vetted Review
Maxio
2 years of experience

SaaSOptics combines invoicing, contract management and revenue recognition for our SaaS business.

Rating: 9 out of 10
Incentivized

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

We are a SaaS Platform and use SaaSOptics to track all customer contracts and to invoice all customers. This solves the issue of tracking credit card payments of similar amounts by numerous customers. We have SaaSOptice integrated with QuickBooks online.

Pros

  • Tracking and renewing all contracts with numerous customers
  • Invoicing customers via email
  • Tracking payments by customers by both credit card, ACH or check

Cons

  • We have contracts that are 12 months long but customers pay monthly. When terms change (raise or lower price) mid contract, changes are not easy.
  • AR collection was an issue. However, SaaSOptics just released a report to track outstanding invoices and it works great.
  • Integration with QuickBooks is OK but it isn't straightforward to issue a credit memo for a particular customer.

Likelihood to Recommend

Revenue recognition is a big issue for SaaS companies whether or not they are audited. SaaSOptics was built around the idea of proper revenue recognition per GAAP. If you have contract with more than 15 customers and need to track those contract expirations, bill the customers, and are concerned with revenue recognition, then the product works well.
Vetted Review
Maxio
1 year of experience

Don't spend another minute on that Revenue Rec spreadsheet!

Rating: 10 out of 10
Incentivized

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

I am an outsourced controller and selected SaaSOptics for my client who sells software as a service on a subscription basis. After attempting to track deferred revenue using an Excel spreadsheet, I knew that there had to be a better way. SaaSOptics allows us to track our contracts, automate billing and payment and generate very useful financial and analytic reports that allow us to better manage the business. It's also taken a huge burden off me as a controller when it comes to generating financial statements using Revenue Recognition.

Pros

  • Tracks revenue recognition and provides journal entries, simplifying the accounting process
  • Provides monthly and annual revenue recognition reports and analytics that allow us to manage the business more easily
  • Maintains all of our relevant contract info, including attachments
  • Automates recurring billing and payments

Cons

  • The dashboard is difficult to customize
  • I would like to be able to delete report snapshots and have a better way to organize saved reports
  • Chat feature for help would be nice

Likelihood to Recommend

For any business that needs to follow ASC 606 Revenue Recognition standards - [they] need to ditch the spreadsheets and go with SaaSOptics.
Vetted Review

Great experience start to finish, from sales to implementation. Highly recommend.

Rating: 10 out of 10
Incentivized

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

We are using SaaSOptics primarily for its revenue recognition and reporting functionality. Current users are myself, in the weeds and using it daily, and our CEO and Sales team who use it for various metrics. The biggest business problem it addresses is revenue recognition. It also provides great metrics for our Bus Dev team.

Pros

  • Revenue recognition. No more spreadsheets! It is robust and highly configurable.
  • Metrics around SaaS sales. ARR, MRR, TCV. All of these things are available quickly and easily,
  • Syncing with Quickbooks online. Nice to not duplicate our efforts. You can continue to invoice using QB, or you can use SaaSOptics to invoice. The flexibility is appreciated.

Cons

  • I would like a bit more visibility into sub-customers. All sub-customers are currently listed under the parent. If there were a way to differentiate each sub-customer without having to drill down too far that would be great.

Likelihood to Recommend

I would recommend SaaSOptics just for the revenue recognition functionality alone. It is robust, and I can finally trash my clunky spreadsheet. But it also comes with analytics and reporting functionality that is very useful as well, across Finance and Sales. I found the implementation to be useful, because we ended up migrating our own data, and in so doing, I was able to learn the software and how it works in a more complete way. I still have a lot to learn about the reporting, but I feel as though I understand how it works on its own, and how it works with QB. Getting our revenue recognition right for 2019 and onward was a high priority for us, since new revenue recognition standards are applicable to non-public companies this month. The process enabled us to "audit" our current year revenue recognition and make sure we have everything in place going forward for accurate, complete and current financial statements.

Chargify is a highly reliable and full featured billing platform for smaller SaaS companies

Rating: 10 out of 10
Incentivized

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

We use it to implement recurring billing for our cloud email sending service.

Pros

  • Incredible reliability - we have literally never had a minute of downtime with Chargify in five years. This is astonishing.
  • Simplicity - the API is relatively easy to use; we were able to get it set up without assistance. Comparatively, services like Zuora require a heavy enterprise consulting engagement to get set up.

Cons

  • Their API documentation has holes; they could definitely do better here.
  • They have quite weak client libraries and have outsourced this critical task to the open source community. That's a mistake. They should have their own client libraries, which they update regularly and ensure are working properly.

Likelihood to Recommend

Anyone with a subscription-based service who needs a fairly comprehensive recurring billing system that they can get up and running quickly, and then basically never worry about again. Chargify is particularly well suited to applications with complex component billing (aka different product add-ons and things which are metered).

Chargify is the best employee money can buy

Rating: 10 out of 10
Incentivized

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

Chargify allows us not to have to create and maintain a billing platform for our SAS product. We could have never created such an amazing system in house for the amount that we pay Chargify.

Pros

  • Easy to use billing platform for a SAS company. Very intuitive.
  • Store credit card information with PCI compliance.
  • Automates our monthly billing.

Cons

  • Great for monthly billing not good for itemized billing that can change month to month.

Likelihood to Recommend

Changify works great as a billing platform for any SAS service that bills monthly. It replaces a part time billing associate / bookkeeper.

Can Chargify can recharge your business?

Rating: 8 out of 10
Incentivized

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

We use Chargify to manage subscription billing for our suite of online property investment software. In addition we use the API/billing portal to manage customer access levels, upgrades/downgrades, card updates and cancellations. Our customers are billing on a monthly and yearly basis. We also use a trial period to allow customers to evaluate our software before being billed. We use add-ons for additional optional products.

Pros

  • Supports multiple products and payment plans.
  • Has a strong admin web user interface.
  • Provides excellent technical support.

Cons

  • More flexible coupons.
  • Finer level of control over emails sent to customers.
  • More options/control within the dunning process.

Likelihood to Recommend

How many products do you need to support?

How many different pricing options do you need to support?

How many features do you need to be built in to a customer billing portal / self service area?

How much control do you need of statements and invoices?