mabl - Easy to use UI test automation!
Use Cases and Deployment Scope
Our company uses mabl for our automated UI tests. The tool we were previously using was sunsetted and we searched and demoed many tools. We initially had an issue using mabl with our application due to some functionality we have on our application, however we wrote back to them telling them that we wouldn't be able to move forward because of this not being supported and we moved on to looking at other tools. Even though we weren't even mabl customers yet, they wrote back as soon as they had that supported, gave us another free trial to try it out, and the rest is history. We were unable to import our previous tests, however, the mabl trainer made this fairly quick work. We have mabl integrated into our CI/CD pipeline now and we are enjoying how easy it is to create and run tests.
Pros
- mabl trainer - record and play back test cases
- Organization - labels and flows make this easy
- Customer support!
Cons
- Asserts could be easier to add, but they aren't terribly hard
Most Important Features
- Customer Support
- Ease of Use
- Integration with other tools
Return on Investment
- We are able to more quickly automate UI tests
Alternatives Considered
TestComplete, Tricentis Tosca, Playwright, Katalon Studio, Tricentis Testim, Eggplant, from Keysight, LEAPWORK, Parasoft Development Testing Solutions, LambdaTest and Testsigma
