TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Lever Information Reviews & Insights

Score8 out of 10

72 Reviews and Ratings

Community insights

TrustRadius Insights for Lever are summaries of user sentiment data from TrustRadius reviews and, when necessary, third party data sources.

Recommendations

Based on the user reviews, users commonly recommend the following for Lever:

  1. Test and customize Lever thoroughly to ensure it is fully customizable for the organization's needs. They suggest taking advantage of Lever's implementation team during the first month and mapping out templates and processes before using the software.

  2. Utilize Lever's support and training resources, as users find them accommodating and knowledgeable about Lever's features. They highly recommend attending startup sessions to properly set up Lever and maximize its capabilities.

  3. Compare Lever with other recruitment systems to ensure it is the right fit for the organization. Users recommend trying out Lever in comparison to other software options like Greenhouse or Workable, especially for early-stage or smaller companies.

Lever Reviews

14 Reviews
InformationComputer Software14

Lead

Rating: 10 out of 10
Incentivized

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

It is user friendly app which uses in hr and interview schedules and refers , it addresses all hr issues easy without lag

Pros

  • Hr
  • Interview management
  • Referring directly

Cons

  • Ui
  • Upgrade new version

Likelihood to Recommend

I am user where my org internal job posting and external job posting to reference and apply access

Helps you be efficient but requires a lot of configuration

Rating: 5 out of 10
Incentivized

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

We had two large hiring influxes over the last year that we needed a way to coordinate and funnel candidates through. Having thousands of applicants makes the funnel process super important and Lever helped us set this up. Lever also provided the job description pages that we had everyone apply through so that we had a standardized structure for applications

Pros

  • Funnels candidates from start to finish of the process
  • Allows for scheduling interview with candidates

Cons

  • Their scheduling tool is super rigid and doesn't support multiple interviewers very well
  • The product requires quite a bit of setup before it becomes as efficient as you'd like

Likelihood to Recommend

Lever probably has too much overhead for a company of our size and we would frequently run into issues that would require an outsized amount of effort to resolve
Vetted Review
Lever
1 year of experience

Series A Startup Scales Early On With Lever

Rating: 8 out of 10
Incentivized

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

Prior to Lever, we didn't have or use any ATS. Lever was not just a solution to a problem for us, but also the tool we planned to use to build, scale and grow our early stage, Series A startup. We went from using Airtable to track our applications and notes, to using Lever's full suite of offerings to manage top of funnel, pipeline, and hiring. We used Zenefits to send our offer letters. But Lever allowed us to create more efficient processes, provide stronger support and resources for our Hiring Managers, and most importantly, create a consistent, fair, and enjoyable experience for our candidates, whether we ended up hiring them or not.

Pros

  • The pipeline view for tracking our applicants is awesome - something that GreenHouse and others could work on a bit.
  • Reporting is strong - easy to create dashboards and ongoing reports to be sent out directly to stakeholders. Helps save a lot of time and create a data driven environment.
  • Onboarding and Customer Support - always the best and quickest replies. Onboarding was a breeze, they were super organized and on top of every single detail. Got us started on the right path and it was easy from there on our own!

Cons

  • Emails - being able to add a Signature would be massive. Not sure if that is something that has been added since we stopped using Lever (we got acquired by DoorDash, so we now use GreenHouse through their systems), but that was the reason I didn't send emails directly through Lever often at all - doesn't look professional without the signature.
  • Resume parsing - sometimes, it would take the incorrect info for the email or phone number, or just not pull anything at all when the info is clearly on the resume. So maybe working on how and what gets pulled from emails on applications, would be great.
  • The look and design of the standard career page is a bit bland. Totally understand branding it as Lever, but options to adjust or do more with it would be fun!

Likelihood to Recommend

I think Lever is great for any sized company, but especially strong for smaller, growing teams. It's a very simple system, but clean, sleek, and very useful in any scenario. They have great support whenever you need it so those with smaller HR or People teams could easily benefit from their help. Can't think of too many scenarios where Lever wouldn't be well-suited, but maybe once you grow to International growth and hiring, it may be better to have a more Enterprise style business, set up for larger scaling.

I am Not fully satisfied with Lever as a collaboration software

Rating: 4 out of 10
Incentivized

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

We primarily use it to track candidates and use it for an internal database for applications. It's also a place where hiring teams can collaborate and gather feedback in one centralized system

Pros

  • Passive candidate tracking
  • Candidate nurture function
  • Visibility across all open reqs

Cons

  • Lever is incredibly difficult for hiring managers to get a quick overview of their pipeline
  • Doesn't have great integrations with LI Recruiter
  • Hard to see data on pipelines

Likelihood to Recommend

Lever unfortunately is not very intuitive, in my opinion. I previously used Greenhouse and I'd recommend that over Lever if you are looking for software to allow recruiting and hiring teams to better collaborate, I believe. Lever's scheduling function isn't great but it works well integrated with Goodtime.
Vetted Review
Lever
1 year of experience

Lever will work just fine

Rating: 6 out of 10
Incentivized

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

We use it as an ats and a tool for debriefing on candidates.

Pros

  • Ats
  • Multiple candidacies
  • Visibility

Cons

  • No funnel metrics
  • Tough to see where candidates came from

Likelihood to Recommend

If you need a basic ats it will get the job done. I would only consider it if it is much cheaper than greenhouse - otherwise you want to go with greenhouse

Leverage your employees to scale quickly with Lever!

Rating: 8 out of 10
Incentivized

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

Lever is being used across the whole organization to track employee referral candidates. Being in hyper growth, we are actively recruiting and hiring over 300 people in 2021. Because of this, the entire organization shares the task to find and recruit the talent. Lever makes it easy for current employees to get their contacts in the system for interviews.

Pros

  • Lever makes it very simple to track referrals
  • Understanding where a referral is at within the interview process is very clear
  • Easy to refer a friend

Cons

  • I wish there was a way for our team to add feedback on why a candidate wasn't hired. It often puts us in a weird spot when someone doesn't get hired and we have to manage that relationship later on and try to explain why they got passed up.
  • It doesn't feel very robust in what you can do--you log in, there's a list of people, you refer someone. It feels like there could be a better way to continue to help the hiring team along the way.
  • Would be great to get notifications along the way as well--candidate progressed to next step, etc.

Likelihood to Recommend

I feel like it gets the job done--allowing employees at scale to refer their friends, get them in the system, and track their progress. If a company is in hyper growth mode and the recruiting team is needing some help/wanting to open up the talent pool, Lever gets the job done!
Vetted Review
Lever
3 years of experience

Pull the Lever!

Rating: 8 out of 10
Incentivized

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

Lever is largely used to store confidential and collaborative feedback about the candidates we are looking to potentially hire. Getting all notes and opinions in one safe place is very helpful and makes decision making much faster, whether it is a yes or a no. Great tool overall for us.

Pros

  • Team hiring.
  • Feedback logic/UI.
  • Notes, next steps, and candidate management.

Cons

  • It would be nice to be easier to navigate for new users.
  • Perhaps functionality where candidates can give hiring teams feedback as well.
  • Pricing.

Likelihood to Recommend

Lever is largely used to store confidential and collaborative feedback about the candidates we are looking to potentially hire. Getting all notes and opinions in one safe place is very helpful and makes decision making much faster, whether it is a yes or a no. Great tool overall for us.

One stop recruitment management tool

Rating: 9 out of 10
Incentivized

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

Lever is currently being used across our whole organization as the preferred tool for organizing recruitment and the overall process from posting job, interview, review, and finally, making an offer.

Pros

  • A lot of integrations with various tools, e.g., Slack, google suite, LinkedIn
  • form customizations

Cons

  • Auditing, e.g., see the history who has accessed the profile
  • History or revision

Likelihood to Recommend

If you are an organization that is looking to consolidate, organize the recruitment process -- Lever tool is definitely for you. On the other hand, if it's a smaller company, you would have to invest a lot since someone needs to maintain the configuration of the recruitment process and it might be tedious.
Vetted Review
Lever
2 years of experience

Lever

Rating: 7 out of 10
Incentivized

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

We use Lever as our tool for evaluating and tracking potential job candidates within our system. It links to our online application portal, we use it to provide feedback on candidates during the interview process, and it can be used when we submit referrals on new hires.

Pros

  • Easy to use
  • Integrated system

Cons

  • Price point for use

Likelihood to Recommend

Lever works well for our organization's needs, wouldn't be necessary for small biz, but it is great to manage hiring and interviewing for our company.
Vetted Review
Lever
3 years of experience

Good at what it does, buy struggles in some areas.

Rating: 7 out of 10
Incentivized

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

Lever is used as a recruiting and referral program for finding candidates for employment. Lever is used by all employees to submit referrals for job postings, and the talent acquisition/recruitment team uses Lever to reach out to candidates, schedule interviews, keep notes, and push candidates through the hiring workflow. Those who are part of the hiring committee, or been asked to participate in an interview are given tasks to review the candidates resume and provide feedback from the interview. Lever keeps everything centralized and keeps the workflow moving.

Pros

  • Keeps candidates information and interview notes organized
  • The interface is pretty simple to navigate
  • Provides a public facing page to list all of your available job postings

Cons

  • Product offering levels seems to be mismatched. You can get single sign on, but API access is separate. Turning on SSO will break the API.
  • The integration into G Suite for mail and calendar when using subdomains and SSO.
  • Doesn't support the use of multiple sub domains very well. We ended up accidentally duplicated every user account and then temporarily lost all candidate notes and feedback.

Likelihood to Recommend

Lever is good as an introductory hiring management solution where you start receiving 50 - 100 applications for a position. It works well with a smaller number of candidates and when there are fewer people involved in the process. Once you start getting several hundred people into the system and you are implementing things like SSO, which most enterprise companies use, things become very complicated and can get messed up very easily.