TrustRadius Insights for LambdaTest are summaries of user sentiment data from TrustRadius reviews and, when necessary, third party data sources.
Pros
Cross-browser and cross-device testing capabilities: Many users have found the product's ability to perform cross-browser and cross-device testing to be very useful for ensuring compatibility across different platforms. They appreciated how it allowed them to easily test their applications on various browsers and devices.
Live interactive testing feature: The live interactive testing feature has been highly appreciated by users as it enables them to test their applications in real-time. This allows them to make necessary adjustments on-the-go, resulting in more efficient and effective testing.
Automated testing functionality: Users have praised the automated testing feature for its efficiency and time-saving benefits. It eliminates the need for manual intervention, allowing tests to run automatically, which saves significant time and effort.
I used LambdaTest as a tester to test the product on different virtual devices. Which helps me to understand about how I can enhance the user experience of the product. Due to it cross browsing functionality I can test my product performance under different browser including to their version under one roof. Which is one of the great things I have seen and used so far. One of my biggest business problems has been resolved to create awareness in front of my clients about the actual product performance and visualization. Which creates trust and confidence in front of my client towards me and also motivates me to do such good work.
Pros
It provides a virtual device that acts as an actual device resolution. Due to that anyone can take a feel of how their product will behave and enact without using actual devices.
Another example is that it also provides a virtual browser with their latest version which helps to analysed the performance of the product.
Cons
As per my experience i would like to say about the performance issue specially when switching the device virtually
Another one which i would like to say about it like session timeout it occurs so quickly if person is inactive while watching and understanding the scenarios
One of the key issue which i feel is that about the documentation which sometimes maybe outdate or not provide the in depth info for automation features
Likelihood to Recommend
As per my experience, LambdaTest is best suited for cross-browser testing due to its providing all trending virtual browsers like Chrome, Edge, Safari, Firefox, etc., along with their latest version. It also provides a flexibility of manual testing the product on different mobile devices which gives the actual user interface of the product for understanding the in depth info of the product.
We use LambdaTest to test our Shopify apps and SaaS web applications. We test custom Shopify app blocks and embedded Shopify app pages. We ensure that our user experience is not disrupted and that the functionalities of our Shopify apps are working properly for our users.LambdaTest saves time and cost for our QA process.
Pros
Custom Shopify app blocks
App embedded pages
Websites
Cons
Live browser sessions can be improved in terms of performance.
The accuracy of real device behavior can be better.
More advanced debugging tools would be helpful for troubleshooting issues during live testing.
Likelihood to Recommend
LambdaTest is helpful for testing our Shopify apps and websites across different browsers and devices. It ensures that our apps and sites work properly across all browsers, devices, and operating systems.
The best thing about LambdaTest is its real-time device testing, which helps identify specific errors on multiple devices, issues that are hard to detect at once due to limited device availability.The main problem LambdaTest solves is providing access to all devices in one place, allowing developers to identify the same errors they would encounter on real devices. This makes life much easier, especially for developers who regularly face cross-device functionality issues. It's a big plus point that positions LambdaTest as an all-in-one solution.
Pros
Multiple Devices of all types available at one place
Give Inspect element inside the testing environment
Ontime support which helps to solve any kind of issue on the platform
Cons
The very first thing is they have to increase the free testing time to 10 minutes per device to actually see the use of the product
The every device usage should limit to atleast 2 times per user to actually see the detailed view for the problem or any issues on the testing
Likelihood to Recommend
One day, I needed to test a specific issue that was occurring only on Pixel phones. I turned to LambdaTest, quickly identified the problem, and was able to fix it. There hasn't been a situation where I felt LambdaTest didn't help, it's my go-to solution for testing, as it solves many problems.
We have been using LambdaTest in our organization for the last 3 years for app testing on real devices. LambdaTest provides 1000+ real devices on a single platform, which saves lots of time and money. You can easily test iOS and Android devices on LambdaTest. It is effortless to use. Customer support is very responsive.
Pros
App Testing on Multiple Real Devices
Variety of Devices
Cons
Speed is an issue
Likelihood to Recommend
We liked LambdaTest because it provides 1000+ devices, which saves lots of time. You can test your app on multiple devices at a single place.
We use it for cross browser testing, testing mobile apps both ios and android on a wide variety of devices, before LambdaTest, we relied on different platforms but they were lacking in many features, api integration to third party apps like mattermost has been like a cherry on cake, as a reactnative dev this has become an important platform to use on daily basis
Pros
Virtual mobile Testing
Cross Browser Testing
Automation
Cons
5 should change to 10 minute free session
Device boot speed is fair can be better
Likelihood to Recommend
As reactnative devs we develop hybrid apps for both ios and android and testing on different physical devices is very annoying while as with LambdaTest we can just select the virtual device boot that and start testing on the go. No need to keep devices. Sometimes clients report issues and they provide the device name and if available in LambdaTest we can just test and fix the device specific bugs
we use LambdaTest primarily for cross-browser and cross-platform testing to ensure our web applications deliver a consistent user experience across different environments. Our testing cycle includes a mix of automated and manual testing, and LambdaTest plays a critical role in both.
We use the manual testing tools to reproduce customer issues reported on specific browser-device combinations. Automated testing is done using Selenium and Cypress on LambdaTest’s cloud grid.
Pros
Parallel test execution
Cross browser testing
Real device
Cons
Inconsistent Performance on Low-Bandwidth Connections
Limited real time devices at some peak times
Debugging tools
Likelihood to Recommend
LambdaTest provides instant access to a wide range of browser/OS combinations and allows us to run these tests in parallel, helping us maintain release velocity without compromising UI quality.
we test aur automation scripts in real device and managing so much devices is not easy lots of problems we faced. LambdaTest provides real devices with good support and available in many locations which is also good.
Pros
real devices that works smoothly and provide real time logs also
integrate with any framework like robot,Appium,testscript
easy and understandable interface
recording also available
Cons
Some devicefarm provide devices available in local like in my local ADB that is missing.
if i do not have any apk file and want to test in chrome so it should run via app package only.
Likelihood to Recommend
Well suited: 1>LambdaTest is having smooth and easy interface it helps user to work smoothly and understand what is the issue in application by using manual test or automation testing. 2> Available in many countrues. Less Suited: 1> my only concern and need was device not available in local only work In cloud based run using appium.
VU
Verified User
Engineer in Information Technology (1001-5000 employees)
We are a gen AI solution builder. We have our own analytics product built on gen AI that caters to the need of a SMB in understanding their financial health. In this product building process, we need to validate the behavior of the application features such as AI auto generated, voice, image, UX, etc which were all tested in cross browser and cross platform using the LambdaTest.
Pros
Cross browser
Cross platform
Cross device
Mobile responsive
Geo location
Cons
AI automation
AI suggestion of test suite to enhance the users testing quality
Ease of listing the user sessions. I found it a bit difficult to navigate
Likelihood to Recommend
Well suited for cross browser manual and automation testing. It supports geo location based testing as well. It's best at testing on various resolutions, platforms, devices and browsers. It's not highly suitable for a localhost testing. Would be great if a system client could connect with localhost to achieve these testing.
The tool is quite good and cost effective when it comes to addressing issues of compatibility, speed, and quality by enabling automated and real-time testing. The scope includes end-to-end testing for both desktop and mobile platforms.
Pros
Providing lots of different browsers to test on chrome, edge firefox and safari
Good Pool of devices to test apk and iOS
Performance and speed analytics while doing testing
Cons
Cross browser application simulation
Cross Operating systems application simulation
Parallel testing so the efforts are not wasted
Likelihood to Recommend
have used the LambdaTest for cross browser and cross OS testing, because it's so cheaper to simulate the application on different virtual platforms on LambdaTest than to buy and maintain each of the hardware. Also, at starting, we used to re-verify the simulation on "real devices" too which worked exactly like it did in LambdaTest. So, I believe it's safe to say that this tool is awesome.
As a Software Test engineer, we have to test web applications on various operating Systems like Mac, Linux and windows. So, we have started using LambdaTest to cover testing on windows 11, Mac Monterary, versions and even Mobile app testing we can perform. It is a great platform to run automation scripts for web and mobile device.
Pros
Cross Browser Testing
Screenshots/Videos for Execution Process help to track the bug easily
UI is user friendly we can learn and access it easily
Quizzes and certifications to increase the knowledge
Cons
Lags a bit while execution
LambdaTest is the learning curve for advance features like customization of test devices feels a bit complex
Likelihood to Recommend
There are various platform options of learning automation testing like Java, Playwright, TestNG and one can learn and get the certification. There are more testing capabilities that Quality engineering teams can leverage.