CONTENTdm Reviews and Ratings

Rating: 6.2 out of 10

Score

6.2 out of 10

Community insights

TrustRadius Insights for CONTENTdm are summaries of user sentiment data from TrustRadius reviews and, when necessary, third party data sources.

Pros

Clean and Easy-to-Use Interface: Users have praised the clean and user-friendly interface of CONTENTdm, making tasks easy to accomplish. The intuitive design has been appreciated by multiple reviewers, leading to a positive user experience.

Customizable Options for Personalization: Reviewers appreciate the customizable options in CONTENTdm, allowing for personalization of the program to suit individual institutions' needs. This flexibility has been valued by several users who found it beneficial in tailoring the software.

Updated OCR Capability: Multiple users express satisfaction with the updated OCR capability in CONTENTdm. They note that this improvement results in much more accurate transcripts, enhancing the searchability and accessibility of digital collections.

Reviews

2 Reviews

Good for now

Rating: 9 out of 10

Incentivized

November 15, 2016

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

We upload collection level records to the platform with a link back to our finding aid and inventory for inclusion in OCLC database.

Pros

Constant URLs
User interface is good
Run by OCLC, not likely to disappear

Cons

We use it for getting our collections to the public but also we use it simply as a bridge back to our own database, the rate we pay for the amount of minimum data is quite a bit. Since we do not use it as a digital preservation system I wish the there were lower rates for the type of use we need.

Likelihood to Recommend

Good if one does not have a lot of IT support such as our smaller university.

Lori Atkins

University Archivist of South Texas Archives at Texas A&M University-Kingsville (51-200 employees)

Vetted Review

2 years of experience

View profile

Easy to use, relatively inexpensive digital management system

Rating: 5 out of 10

Incentivized

November 14, 2016

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

CONTENTdm is being used by the university library, especially by the Special Collections and University Archives department, to manage the library's digital collections.

Pros

Relatively easy to use for staff to manage collections, without complex workflows.
The end-user interface is friendly, a user can easily navigate around the image with zooming, panning, etc. There is a built-in video player, which is nice.
The product is relatively inexpensive.
It is easy to implement and maintain.

Cons

As a digital asset management system, one would expect the capability of managing preservation, which CONTENTdm lacks.
Lack of batch updating and other advanced metadata management capabilities.
The usage statistics does not work, and the company is not planning to fix it, at least based the interaction with tech support staff. Customers were referred to use Google Analytics.

Likelihood to Recommend

CONTENTdm is well-suited for smaller organizations as a simple solution to present a digital collection on the web. If your need is complex and requires digital preservation as part of the workflow, it may not be the best solution.

Verified User

Professional in Information Technology (1001-5000 employees)

Vetted Review

12 years of experience

Loading Reviews List....

Home
,
Digital Asset Management
,
CONTENTdm
,
Reviews and Ratings