high-performance storage solution for industry needs
Use Cases and Deployment Scope
We are using Cisco Cloud Object Storage (COS) for storing the backups and archiving the old data. We are also using it as an attachment storage for a few of the applications that require frequent file storage, like our account and billing departments. Some of the applications are based on the data retrieval from the Cisco Cloud Object Storage (COS) via REST APIs.
Pros
- Application and Database backup storage.
- Archiving legacy data.
- Attachment and media storage.
Cons
- Better 3rd party integration is needed for the use cases where applications can use Cisco Cloud Object Storage (COS) directly.
- Cisco Cloud Object Storage (COS) implementation with an On-premise network can be made more robust.
- There can be some enhancement in the version control feature of the files specifically for the REST API based applications.
Return on Investment
- Cheaper to use Cisco Cloud Object Storage (COS) than the on-premise storage and hence savings in infrastructure cost.
- Using Cloud based storage has reduced the manpower resources required to maintain the storage infrastructure, further reducing costs.
- Overall, end-user latency has reduced by using Cisco Cloud Object Storage (COS) as a content delivery network for the media files.
Usability
Alternatives Considered
Azure Blob Storage, Amazon S3 (Simple Storage Service) and Backblaze B2 Cloud Storage
Other Software Used
Amazon S3 (Simple Storage Service), Azure Blob Storage, Backblaze B2 Cloud Storage


