Best integrator out now (still)
Rating: 9 out of 10
IncentivizedUse Cases and Deployment Scope
Using Make in an agency capacity to help clients save or gain back time using automations. Make's interface is one of the better ones in the industry and overcomes the limitations of other, more well known SaaS in the industry. This makes it easier for my team to design a workflow out and visualize it. It's numerous integrations with tools that my clients use is a helpful addition.
Pros
- Nice UI for visualizing workflows
- Easy to understand billing (operations/time)
- Thousands of built in integrations to work with
Cons
- Better navigational capabilities from scenarios
- Better use of AI or prompting for complex things like iterators/aggregators
- A "test mode" so that you don't have a ton of runs that are invalid or to be able to populate dummy data without wasting unnecessary operations to create it.
Likelihood to Recommend
Make is really good at being the single source of truth for my clients workflows. It's easy to see how many operations were used, rerun scenarios if they've errored out, and to be able to access those to validate the data. Except for the odd use case where I need to access the native api of a tool Make's integrations are robust. I'd like to see Make work with larger vendors like Kajabi for example for better integrations instead of relying on tired marketplace (paid) implementations.