Canto is used to organize final versions of assets for the organization. We use Canto to easily search for assets, label relationships between assets, track analytics on the viewing and downloading of assets, share assets, receive assets, etc. We also use Canto's style guide template to share information within the organization, such as branding and guides for using Canto. We also create share links to share assets in the workspaces of the PAT portal through Sitefinity.
Pros
Search Feature.
Analytics
Link Creation.
Speed of uploading and downloading.
Cons
I struggle with using Canto's style guide feature. I would love to see this feature improve.
There needs to be the addition of a search feature for the list of share links. As my organization's number of share links increases, it is becoming difficult to find share links when we need to use or edit them.
Likelihood to Recommend
Canto is an excellent tool for organizing assets and searching for them in one location. I also really enjoy using the mobile version of Canto on my smartphone when I am on the go. Canto is robust and fast and it has been a major advancement in the way that my organization stores and shares assets.
We use Canto as a place to sort all of our digital asset. As an organization that has a lot of historical documents, Canto is a great place for us to digitally store photos, pdfs, videos, and so much more. It also is a great asset for our organization since half of us work remotely.
Pros
Tagging ability
Organizational tools for digital assets
Automatic tags
Customer support/learning hub tools
Likelihood to Recommend
Canto is really helpful when we need to give access to digital content to third party vendors. The ability to create specific links and folders for them and customize what they can do with the content is super useful, especially when dealing with copyrighted materials. I think it is possible for Canto to be less useful depending on the types of content you are working with. For us, it's perfect but I could see situations where certain file types might not work well within Canto.
We used Canto for our marketing department Dam system. We liked that it was cloud based. It was being used to handle our photos, PDFs, and Videos. Our goal was to move approved assets off a local file server to a solution that was easier to search, tag, and organize our files for our team and our entire organization. We had about 2000 assets in the DAM.
Pros
Tagging
Search
Sorting
Cons
Viewing
Sharing
Linking files together
Overal UX/UI
Likelihood to Recommend
It was good for a basic DAM solution. It worked off a file storage UX so for many people it would be a very familiar workflow. It was easy to add tags, and other info to files. Unfortunately the performance and UX/UI was not well suited for large asset libraries which made going through a lot of assets a pain. The file sharing solutions were not well handled. Overall the system felt very dated.
Canto is used by the [...] across the national organization and Chapters to manage digital assets for publishing photos, images, and other creative assets for collaboration, to maintain copyrights, and digital communications.
Pros
Library for digital assets
Ensure usage and copyrights are managed correctly
Support collaboration for digital engagement and communications
Cons
Integration with Marketing Cloud
Likelihood to Recommend
I think Canto is very well suited to small, medium, and large organizations with the need for collecting and managing digital assets to scale. In my experience, it is a very powerful tool that requires training, onboarding and support depending on the experience of the user community and use case.
Canto helps store, organize, optimize, and share out our reports and collateral pieces, including images, videos, and other documents, internally and externally.
Pros
Tagging and searching
Simplifying organized digital files
Cons
Integrating AI or other smart tools to recognize and identify what's in documents or images to better enhance search
Simplify or better visualize the sorting and multiple sub-folders of storage
Likelihood to Recommend
Great for tagging and organizing content. I wish there was a way to better optimize the viewing experience for an external audience - i.e., create mini webpages of sorts that do not look technical or back end for select audiences like VIP donors or executives. For now, the visuals look more technical and would be too overwhelming to send to older recipients.
We use Canto as a photo and permissions database. It addresses the lack of a centralized database.
Pros
Search function
Permissions function
sizing
Cons
The UX could be a bit better, it's a bit clunky
Ability to add written or multimedia storytelling
Likelihood to Recommend
Canto is great for an asset search database to track permissions and resize. I wish it would be a bit more useful as a multimedia storytelling and tracking repository, with the ability to easily reach out to content owners.
We use Canto mainly as storage for our files, to share images with donors, and other departments or external partners, and to create portals for nonprofits to access materials during community events.
Pros
Tags
Portals
Support response time
Cons
Share links creation/customization/search
Face detection isn't that easy to use
Would be nice if there was an option to automatically upload files every night/sync files
Likelihood to Recommend
Canto is good for sharing files and creating boundaries around the share links. It is good for storing files and the search function works well within the Library. The share links could use some work, and this is where our team spends a lot of our time within Canto. It would be nice is Share Links were customizable links, and if it were easier to search for past share links, via a search bar within the Collection Links section.
My organization uses CANTO to collect, structure, store, and distribute content (pictures, videos, stories, publications) and, to a lesser extent coordinate and plan content use for external and internal communication. The system is optimized for quick and easy access from nearly every country we work from (mainly Africa and Europe), and it can be worked with from computers as well as tablets and mobile phones. The interface (filters, albums, presets, ...) is highly customizable, which is great, but it also means a clear idea of the structure you want to set up before starting to work is a good idea. Users can communicate on the platform itself with comments and save their own searches and collections. The main functions the majority of our users currently use are making "best of" collections and sending links to (often large) files to internal and external contacts. CANTO also has a style guide function, which is also very handy to share e.g., with external designers. The CANTO customer support is very responsive. Even if some issues cannot be resolved right away, you always get an answer (from a real person, not a bot). I also like the tutorials library on their website. Among the few things, I would improve are the ways in which user groups can collaborate.
Pros
Accessibility from basically everywhere and across platforms.
Search and filter function.
Responsive and helpful customer support.
Curate content function can be "misused" to plan and coordinate across teams.
Excellent reporting features and dashboard on what goes on in your CANTO.
Good version control, easy to update outdated or changed files, and revert back to older versions if needed.
Cons
Workspace functionalities are not always clear.
User groups collaboration and user rights could be more varied.
The way in which some files are sorted could be solved differently.
Likelihood to Recommend
CANTO is well suited if you, like us, have a large team with members across several countries, a large pool of assets, and your colleagues need to find specific content fast. It is also well suited if you work a lot with external contacts and as an archive for past materials, campaigns, and reports... that need to stay accessible for internal use. You need to dedicate a full-time position to managing and maintaining the database for an organization of the medium size and to train your employees on how to use it (believe me). CANTO is not well suited - in my opinion - for smaller teams or if you use your content only once or twice and then move on to entirely new campaigns. I would also not use it for dynamic content (like word documents that are still commented on and being rewritten).
We use Canto across our entire organization of six core staff and over 200 volunteers. In addition, we use it with our partner organizations and vendors.
Pros
Face recognition to quickly find agent, staff, volunteer, etc.
When a child passes away we send a thumb drive in a beautiful box to the parents that includes all photos and video we have of the child.
Sharing photo and video files with our sponsors, video production vendors and other partners.
One DAM Base saves us all time and effort searching for “that one photo” we saw once. We all upload, share and have access to all photo assets.
MIB Agents Media will be available as a legacy for all time, not just for current stewards of the org.
Cons
Seems they think of everything.
Likelihood to Recommend
Extremely useful for finding photos of things and people across our vast library of photo and video media.
I cannot think of a scenario where it would not be useful.
Our Communications team uses Canto to store and organize our photos for different campaigns. We share photos across our organization and with folks outside our organization regularly. Canto helps us to quickly find photos using the search function, allows us to have people outside our team upload and download photos, and helps us only share what we need to.
Pros
Organization
Sharing
Search
Cons
Settings can be a little confusing
It'd be nice to have one place where folks outside our org can collaborate / upload + download
Likelihood to Recommend
Canto is well suited for situations where I need to collect photos from several people outside my organization - I can create an upload link. It's also well suited for sharing a collection of photos with people outside my team or outside my organization. It's less appropriate when I need to collaborate with a large group outside my organization in a way that folks need to share photos (upload) and download photos from the same space.