TrustRadius Insights for BlazeMeter are summaries of user sentiment data from TrustRadius reviews and, when necessary, third party data sources.
Pros
Intuitive and Uncluttered UI: Several users have mentioned that Blazemeter has a very intuitive and uncluttered user interface. They appreciate its simplicity, making it easy for beginners to figure out and get started with.
Seamless Transition from JMeter: Many reviewers have highlighted the seamless transition from JMeter to Blazemeter. They mention that Blazemeter takes the .jmx script already written for JMeter, eliminating the need to learn a new tool or language.
Cloud Platform and Real-life User Simulation: The fact that Blazemeter offers its own cloud platform is seen as a positive aspect by several users. It eliminates the need to set up on-premise infrastructure. Additionally, users like that Blazemeter has the capability to simulate real-life users by hitting applications from various geographic locations.
We use it before every internal release to monitor the performance of our site and then we re run it after the deploy in our development environments so we can identify if our performance is being affected by the functionalities that we are planning to release. BlazeMeter help us to identify performance impact or deprecation that new functionalities might introduce before releasing them into a live environment so we can act on consequence and fix and improve our code with anticipation. We also use it as a complement with other tools like Catchpoint, with BlazeMeter we introduce some load to the application and in the meanwhile we run Catchpoint tests to identify other issues.
Pros
Results are easy to read
Tests can be run easily
Tests can ben imported easily from jMeter
Cons
none at all, I really took my time thinking about this and the tool is really simple, clean and complete
Likelihood to Recommend
It is good for measurements of performance testing. It can be used to run API testing. I can not use this for monitoring but it can be used as a complement for monitoring tools (like Catchpoint or New Relic). It can help to produce load on your site and monitor.
VU
Verified User
Analyst in Quality Assurance (Internet company, 201-500 employees)
We user Blazemeter to load and stress test several online radio streaming websites managed by my company. As far as I know it was being used by my department only at the time.
Pros
Blazemeter has very intuitive and uncluttered UI. It is very easy for a beginner to figure out and get started.
Blazemeter allows several methods of creating performance tests - using several popular open source applications. Therefore most often there is no need to learn to use a new tool or language.
Cons
Blazemeter reporting is very basic and shallow. There is no way to drill down or correlate. I can get better reports by using JMeter for free.
Blazemeter is very costly. Testing with volumes of more than 1K cu is expensive, and can be done for much cheaper if a company/team is willing to invest a bit of time to figure out how to use cloud instances and jmeter slaves, and to write a basic script to collect resulting xml output.
Likelihood to Recommend
Performance testing is a complex concept to grasp and Blazemeter is easy to get started with. So if a completely non-technical beginner needed immediate results and cost was not an issue, I would recommend Blazemeter as a temporary, short term solution. However, if the individuals intention is to execute performance testing regularly, I would strongly encourage them to consider other means. For example Redline13 + JMeter.
VU
Verified User
Engineer in Quality Assurance (Media Production company, 5001-10,000 employees)