Azure Firewall Manager provides central network security policy and route management for globally distributed, software-defined perimeters. It offers centralized configuration and management of multiple Azure Firewall instances, across Azure regions and subscriptions.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Network Engineer in Information Technology at National Aviation Services (1001-5000 employees employees)
Use Cases and Deployment Scope
We use Azure firewall Manager to manage central security policies and route management. Most important is that this product provide and addresses the central security policies for deployment and management in our organization. This product is primarily used for platform security.
Pros
Anti -Spam and protection against phishing.
Endpoint Security.
DDOS Protection.
Cons
Only we can do one way NATING.
Initial setup was not easy.
Dashboard Need improvement.
Return on Investment
Provide and increased efficiency in security.
Price wise it is expensive.
Managing and controlling multiple firewall from one centralize portal.
Alternatives Considered
Sophos Intercept X for Server, Sophos XG Firewall and Cisco Wireless LAN Controllers
Other Software Used
Sophos Intercept X for Server, Azure Application Gateway, Azure App Service, Cisco 350X Series Stackable Managed Switches
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
3rd Line Business Systems Engineer in Information Technology at North West Ambulance Service NHS Trust (5001-10,000 employees employees)
Use Cases and Deployment Scope
We have implemented the WAF in Azure to secure our internally developed Web Apps that are hosted in Azure. It has allowed us to provide access to users externally from our organization to our Azure apps without compromising security. Using the WAF allows us to funnel traffic into Azure whilst using Conditional Access in Azure AD with Enterprise Apps.
Pros
Security
Firewall
Traffic
Cons
Functionality
Setup is difficult.
Networking
Return on Investment
Externally hosted firewall.
No cost having on Orem appliance.
Cheaper as we only pay for what is use in Azure for it.
Alternatives Considered
Azure Application Gateway
Other Software Used
Azure Application Gateway, Microsoft Azure Active Directory, Microsoft Exchange
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Verified User
Technician in Information Technology (201-500 employees employees)
Use Cases and Deployment Scope
Managed multiple sites and their connections into Azure to link multiple regions. It solved the need for having multiple places to visit to setup / troubleshoot network and firewall issues. Gave us DDOS protection and the ability to implement web application firewalls. Gave one dashboard to view and controll all the network
Pros
Central Azure Firewall management
Automate traffic routing
Third Party support
Cons
Bulk IP address fails, requires you to split it up smaller
Firewall Rules dont always have good descriptions
No Traffic Splitting
Return on Investment
Reduced time required to manage multiple products
Increased network visability
Good logs for audits
Alternatives Considered
Juniper Advanced Threat Prevention
Other Software Used
Azure VMware Solution, Veeam Backup for Azure, KnowBe4 PhishER