TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

AWS CodePipeline Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services Reviews & Insights

Score6.7 out of 10

33 Reviews and Ratings

AWS CodePipeline Reviews

3 Reviews
Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesInformation Technology & Services3

AWS CodePipeline Review

Rating: 9 out of 10
Incentivized

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

CodePipeline is used by many development teams across the company. We are a heavy GitHub Enterprise user, but those who are seeking a CI/CD type product that has a slick integration with GitHub AND native AWS support - those users always go to CodePipeline. It can also integrate with S3 which is a huge advantage for those who have code files deployed in AWS already and can blend them with files from their teams enterprise GitHub repos. Some of our users also rely on CodeCommit and have integrated CodePipeline with that service as well. The major problem it solves for us is ease of integration and the ability to fully automate + test a release.

Pros

  • ease of use
  • multiple service integrations
  • option for container (ECS) support
  • automatic change detection

Cons

  • no local integration
  • interface limitations
  • time to setup

Likelihood to Recommend

CodePipeline is well suited for an already existing AWS-native deployment. It is very easy to connect to existing repos like GitHub enterprise or cloud repos like CodeCommit. Being able to define the process by code (YAML) is a huge benefit for developers who favor that type of deployment setup. The UI is easy to use yet very powerful and customizable. Being able to leverage CloudTrail or Lambda is quite powerful, especially in larger more complex projects.
It becomes less valuable with smaller projects or locally hosted deployments that don't get the benefits of a managed service in the AWS ecosystem. However, there are agents that can be run on private servers to allow integration. But naturally, smaller one-off projects benefit less from the automation value derived by CodePipeline.
Vetted Review
AWS CodePipeline
2 years of experience

Automated code deployment pipeline on Amazon

Rating: 7 out of 10
Incentivized

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

AWS CodePipeline is being used as a continuous integration/continuous deployment tool at my organization. It is used by specific teams that require builds within a CI/CD developer workflow. The business problems it addresses is the need for automated code deployment and testing pipeline that allows for a continuous flow of code from testing to staging to deployment.

Pros

  • Continuous integration
  • Continuous delivery
  • Automated release pipeline

Cons

  • Amazon exclusivity
  • Cleaner interface

Likelihood to Recommend

AWS CodePipeline is well suited for a specific software engineering workflow. If there is a need to deploy code within a framework, then this is a great tool to automate the code deployments outward. The scenarios where it is less appropriate is in situations of internal tooling or other code that might not change as often or are tools running locally.
Vetted Review
AWS CodePipeline
2 years of experience

AWS CodePipeline for easy deployment setup

Rating: 8 out of 10
Incentivized

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

AWS CodePipeline is one piece of several autoscaling back-end infrastructures I have launched in AWS. CodePipeline, in conjunction with CodeDeploy, allows for automated testing, building & deployment of Github & S3 hosted code. CodePipeline can be thought of the orchestrator of a typical AWS code deployment setup. It allows you to setup the source of the code change (S3/Github/etc) and then define the steps the code takes. For example, you can implement a build step using AWS CodeBuild. You can also implement test & deploy steps. By using CodeDeploy, you can keep a fleet of instances up-to-date with the latest code releases.

Pros

  • CodePipeline reacts very quickly to new GitHub commits. It often starts new builds nearly instantly after code is pushed.
  • The CodePipeline console & wizard is very intuitive. It was very easy to setup CodePipeline instances and define exactly required stages & the services to fulfill the stages.
  • CodePipeline allows you to easily restart failed steps, right from the status page. The web console shows the current status of the builds and seems to not lag too far behind the actual status.

Cons

  • If you are not using GitHub, the setup for integrating with a repository is complicated. Doesn't appear to offer support for other revision control services or other revision control tools out-of-the-box.
  • CodePipeline is probably too expensive for personal projects, especially if you use the other AWS tools for the pipeline steps like CodeDeploy.
  • Not as flexible or customizable as a self-hosted Jenkins server.

Likelihood to Recommend

I think AWS CodePipeline is a great tool for anyone wanted automated deployments in a multi-server/container AWS environment. AWS also offers services like Elastic Beanstalk that provide a more managed hosting & deployment experience. CodePipeline is a good middle ground with solid, built-in automation with enough customizability to not lock people into one deployment or architecture philosophy.