Based on 47 verified reviews published in the last 18 months
In a review set of 47, users were asked what other products they have used or evaluated that are similar to Atlassian Confluence. Microsoft SharePoint is the most frequently mentioned alternative, appearing in 23% (11 of 47) of reviews. Atlassian Jira was also commonly cited, with 13% (6 of 47) of reviewers mentioning it. Miro and Trello were each mentioned by 9% (4 of 47) of reviewers. Google Drive and Notion were mentioned by 6% (3 of 47) of reviewers. Other products mentioned include Coda, Slack and Basecamp, each appearing in 4% (2 of 47) of reviews. Reviewers often mentioned multiple products in conjunction, indicating that they may be used together or have overlapping functionalities. This suggests that users often consider a range of tools when looking for solutions similar to Atlassian Confluence.
Microsoft SharePoint is a frequently mentioned alternative to Atlassian Confluence, with 23% (11 of 47) of reviewers ci…
Microsoft SharePoint is a frequently mentioned alternative to Atlassian Confluence, with 23% (11 of 47) of reviewers citing it. Reviewers often list SharePoint alongside other tools, implying it's a common solution for similar needs. The mentions do not indicate a clear sentiment, but rather recognition of SharePoint as a comparable product.
Atlassian Jira is mentioned by 13% (6 of 47) of reviewers as another product they have used or evaluated. Reviewers oft…
Atlassian Jira is mentioned by 13% (6 of 47) of reviewers as another product they have used or evaluated. Reviewers often mention Jira in conjunction with other Atlassian products, suggesting an integrated ecosystem. The sentiment is mixed, with mentions ranging from specific modules like 'Jira Service Management' to broader comparisons.
Miro is mentioned by 9% (4 of 47) of reviewers. These reviewers often list Miro alongside other visual collaboration to…
Miro is mentioned by 9% (4 of 47) of reviewers. These reviewers often list Miro alongside other visual collaboration tools, implying a similar use case. The sentiment is mixed, with mentions of Miro appearing in lists of both alternatives and complementary products.
Trello is mentioned by 9% (4 of 47) of reviewers. Reviewers often mention Trello alongside other project management and…
Trello is mentioned by 9% (4 of 47) of reviewers. Reviewers often mention Trello alongside other project management and collaboration tools, suggesting it serves a similar purpose. The sentiment is mixed, with Trello being listed among various alternatives.
Google Drive is mentioned by 6% (3 of 47) of reviewers. These reviewers often mention Google Drive alongside Microsoft…
Google Drive is mentioned by 6% (3 of 47) of reviewers. These reviewers often mention Google Drive alongside Microsoft SharePoint, implying a comparison between the two cloud storage and collaboration platforms. The sentiment is mixed, with mentions appearing in lists of alternatives.
This report synthesizes 47 recent reviews to assess the return on investment (ROI) of Atlassian Confluence. Reviewers most frequently cite improvements in time savings and efficiency (43%, 20 of 47) as contributing to Confluence's positive impact on business objectives. A substantial number of users also highlight improved collaboration (34%, 16 of 47) and its function as a knowledge base and documentation tool (32%, 15 of 47). These benefits are closely linked, as Confluence's ability to centralize information streamlines workflows and reduces the need for meetings. Furthermore, many reviewers (21%, 10 of 47) specifically mention increased productivity as a result of using Confluence. However, a small fraction of reviewers report issues with search and usability (9%, 4 of 47), noting difficulty in finding information, which can offset some of the time-saving benefits.
A significant portion of reviewers (43%, 20 of 47) report that Confluence saves time by streamlining processes such as…
A significant portion of reviewers (43%, 20 of 47) report that Confluence saves time by streamlining processes such as note-taking, drafting recommendations, and managing tasks. Reviewers also find that Confluence reduces reliance on outdated documents, centralizes information, and facilitates efficient communication, contributing to overall time savings.
Many reviewers (34%, 16 of 47) credit Confluence with improving collaboration by creating standardized processes and fa…
Many reviewers (34%, 16 of 47) credit Confluence with improving collaboration by creating standardized processes and facilitating information sharing across teams. The platform enables teams to work together on documents remotely, coordinate planning events, and maintain a single source of truth, reducing the need for internal meetings.
A substantial number of reviewers (32%, 15 of 47) highlight Confluence's value as a centralized knowledge base and docu…
A substantial number of reviewers (32%, 15 of 47) highlight Confluence's value as a centralized knowledge base and documentation tool. Confluence helps organize procedures, improve access to information, and ensure a single source of truth for critical business processes, which helps to reduce rework.
About one-fifth of reviewers (21%, 10 of 47) report that Atlassian Confluence boosts team productivity. This increase s…
About one-fifth of reviewers (21%, 10 of 47) report that Atlassian Confluence boosts team productivity. This increase stems from faster development times, better project planning and tracking, and more efficient resource management.
A small percentage of reviewers (9%, 4 of 47) express concerns about Confluence's search functionality and overall usab…
A small percentage of reviewers (9%, 4 of 47) express concerns about Confluence's search functionality and overall usability. Some reviewers find it difficult to locate information, which increases the time spent searching.
This analysis of 47 product reviews explores what other software reviewers regularly use alongside Atlassian Confluence. Atlassian Jira is by far the most frequently mentioned complementary software, with 49% of reviewers (23 of 47) noting its use alongside Confluence. Microsoft 365, Slack, and Miro are each mentioned by 11% of reviewers (5 of 47), suggesting a notable but less dominant pattern of co-usage. Google Drive and Microsoft Teams are also mentioned, but at a lower rate of 6% (3 of 47) and 9% (4 of 47) respectively. The consistent co-mention of Jira indicates a strong integration or workflow dependency between the two Atlassian products, while the other tools suggest a broader ecosystem of collaboration and productivity software used in conjunction with Confluence.
Atlassian Jira is the most frequently mentioned software used alongside Confluence, with 49% of reviewers (23 of 47) me…
Atlassian Jira is the most frequently mentioned software used alongside Confluence, with 49% of reviewers (23 of 47) mentioning it. This high rate suggests a strong integration or workflow dependency between the two Atlassian products. Reviewers did not elaborate on the nature of their co-usage, but the frequency indicates a common pattern.
Microsoft 365 is mentioned by 11% of reviewers (5 of 47) as software used alongside Atlassian Confluence. This indicate…
Microsoft 365 is mentioned by 11% of reviewers (5 of 47) as software used alongside Atlassian Confluence. This indicates a moderate level of integration or complementary use within a broader productivity suite. The specific applications within Microsoft 365 were not consistently specified, suggesting general usage rather than reliance on a particular component.
Slack is mentioned by 11% of reviewers (5 of 47) as a tool used alongside Atlassian Confluence. This suggests that Slac…
Slack is mentioned by 11% of reviewers (5 of 47) as a tool used alongside Atlassian Confluence. This suggests that Slack serves as a communication and collaboration hub that complements Confluence's documentation and knowledge management capabilities. The reviewers did not elaborate on the specific ways they integrate the two tools.
Miro is mentioned by 11% of reviewers (5 of 47), indicating its use as a collaborative whiteboard platform alongside At…
Miro is mentioned by 11% of reviewers (5 of 47), indicating its use as a collaborative whiteboard platform alongside Atlassian Confluence. This suggests that reviewers find value in using Miro for visual collaboration and brainstorming in conjunction with Confluence's documentation features. The reviewers did not elaborate on the specific ways they integrate the two tools.
Microsoft Teams is mentioned by 9% of reviewers (4 of 47), indicating its use as a communication and collaboration plat…
Microsoft Teams is mentioned by 9% of reviewers (4 of 47), indicating its use as a communication and collaboration platform alongside Atlassian Confluence. While less frequent than Jira, the mention rate suggests that some users integrate Teams for real-time communication and Confluence for documentation. The reviewers did not elaborate on the specific ways they integrate the two tools.
This analysis of 47 recent reviews reveals several areas where Atlassian Confluence is perceived to perform well. A strong signal is its integration with Jira, mentioned by 28% (13 of 47) of reviewers, who appreciate the ability to link development tracking, bug reports, and other work directly to Confluence documentation. Many reviewers, 19% (9 of 47), also highlight the ease of use, citing the simple interface for structuring pages and creating documents. Documentation capabilities are also frequently lauded, with 19% (9 of 47) of reviewers emphasizing its value as a central source of truth for meeting discussions, decisions, and other project-related information. Collaboration features are another strength, noted by 17% (8 of 47) of reviewers, who value the ability for multiple users to edit and comment on documents. Finally, reviewers appreciate the platform's permissions management, mentioned by 13% (6 of 47), which allows for tailored access control.
A significant portion of reviewers, 28% (13 of 47), praise Atlassian Confluence for its integration with Jira, which fa…
A significant portion of reviewers, 28% (13 of 47), praise Atlassian Confluence for its integration with Jira, which facilitates tracking development, bugs, and other work linked to Confluence documentation. Reviewers appreciate the seamless connection between the two platforms, enabling developers and project managers to rely more on Confluence. Some reviewers specifically mention the ability to add Jira tickets to Confluence pages.
About 19% (9 of 47) of reviewers highlight the ease of use of Atlassian Confluence, citing its intuitive interface for…
About 19% (9 of 47) of reviewers highlight the ease of use of Atlassian Confluence, citing its intuitive interface for structuring pages. Reviewers appreciate the simplicity in creating and managing project documents, team rosters, design documents, and architectural diagrams. The platform's user-friendliness and simple editing features contribute to its accessibility.
Also, 19% (9 of 47) of reviewers value Confluence's documentation capabilities, emphasizing its role as a central sourc…
Also, 19% (9 of 47) of reviewers value Confluence's documentation capabilities, emphasizing its role as a central source of truth for meeting discussions and decisions. Reviewers appreciate the ability to write documentation in plain text and the real-time editing feature. The platform serves as a repository for project documentation and knowledge sharing.
Approximately 17% (8 of 47) of reviewers commend Atlassian Confluence for its collaboration features, enabling multiple…
Approximately 17% (8 of 47) of reviewers commend Atlassian Confluence for its collaboration features, enabling multiple users to edit and comment on documents. Reviewers appreciate the platform's ability to foster team collaboration and knowledge sharing across teams. Confluence facilitates communication and document collaboration among users.
Around 13% (6 of 47) of reviewers praise Atlassian Confluence for its permissions management capabilities, allowing for…
Around 13% (6 of 47) of reviewers praise Atlassian Confluence for its permissions management capabilities, allowing for tailored access control. Reviewers appreciate the ability to manage permissions and control access for internal users who require custom access. The platform enables users to make some spaces public while keeping others private.