The HPE Aruba Networking EdgeConnect SD-WAN platform addresses the challenges associated with backhauling cloud-destined traffic to the data center, thereby reducing the cost of bandwidth connectivity from the data center to cloud providers.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Verified User
Engineer in Information Technology (5001-10,000 employees employees)
Use Cases and Deployment Scope
We currently use HPE Aruba Networking EdgeConnect SD-WAN solution as our method for connecting our sites via SD-WAN. Primarily our environment is a fully meshed environment, which is an easy to configure option with the HPE Aruba Networking EdgeConnect SD-WAN solution. It's a very reliable product which allows for our high uptime demands that has come with an amazing customer vendor relationship.
Pros
Linking multiple sites quickly and efficiently
High uptime
HA Configurations with active active load balancing
Fully SaaS controller that is only dependent upon WAN devices having internet access (which they should be plugged into)
Cons
There are a lot of menus for items to hide under
Often there are alarms that are false positives due to bugs in the code - these are usually rectified in the next patch but that seems to be a common occurrence with updates
Can only have 7 "BIOs" - which are effectively policies that you use to choose how traffic is handled in terms of routing and QoS
Devices throughput is capped by Aruba licensing meaning that's an additional concern you'll have to monitor and take into consideration when choosing ISPs.
Alerts sometimes don't tell you things you'd like to know (like when a site is nearing its bandwidth cap)
Return on Investment
It's simplified and expedites traffic by building and managing tunnels between all sites
Does have integrations with Zscaler Internet Access which is a product we've recently onboarded
Has a semi high learning curve as it can do a lot (suffers from the same issue as Aruba ClearPass where it can do so much which makes it a daunting tool to learn, but a powerful one)
Usability
Alternatives Considered
Palo Alto Networks Prisma SD-WAN
Other Software Used
HPE Aruba Networking ClearPass Policy Manager, Palo Alto Networks Next-Generation Firewalls - PA Series, Zscaler Digital Experience (ZDX), Zscaler Internet Access, Zscaler Private Access, HPE Aruba Networking Switches
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Verified User
Manager in Information Technology (501-1000 employees employees)
Pros
Fairly easy to manage once its setup and running
Updates are easy and handled with little downtime
Price is just right for the product functionality
Cons
Configuring the product initially can be complex and confusing
Support could respond quicker
More features would always be nice
Return on Investment
Changed the way we manage remote sites
Saved us funds in the LAN budget
Created new opportunities to roll out functions at these sites
Other Software Used
Juniper WLA & WLC Series (discontinued), Dell EMC PowerFlex (formerly VxFlex or VxRack), Cisco Aironet 1800 Series Access Points
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Verified User
Consultant in Marketing (501-1000 employees employees)
Pros
An intricate system of connections that make it seem like your outside sites are all on one single LAN
Well priced in their category as others are a bit pricier for the same services
Aruba is backed by a well staffed support team that can get you through your issues
Cons
Ran into some weird bugs along the way that required support to address
Not having physical devices that you can reboot yourself takes a bit of control away
Administrators have a bit of a learning curve in figuring out the new system
Return on Investment
ROI is still to be determined as you have to calculate the existing hardware costs
Theoretically you could be saving lots of time managing all the hardware in between sites
SDWAN is still new and may take an entirely new budget to accomplish
Other Software Used
Dell EMC Networker, Juniper WLA & WLC Series (discontinued), Cisco Wireless LAN Controllers
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Verified User
Analyst in Information Technology (501-1000 employees employees)
Pros
The software and web interface is nicely designed
Fewer bugs than some other competing services
Cons
The right support team for your product can be difficult to get ahold of
Integration with Cisco is not as super tight as integration with Aruba devices
Some of the advanced features are difficult to use
Return on Investment
It has created a bit of overhead as another control panel that needs to be managed
Recovery of invested costs will take some time
Time is saved on the separate management of sites
Other Software Used
KnowBe4 PhishER, Cisco Firepower NGFW (formerly Sourcefire), Cisco DNA Analytics and Assurance