Excellent tool that is very good to perform exploratory tests with reliable results. It is committed to quality
Pros
- It is very easy to use and adapt, allowing the QA to do the tests faster and detect errors in a timely manner.
- It has helped us decrease development time on new applications, since we used to spend a lot time solving errors after the launch of the application.
- It has helped us a lot in our testing processes, since the tool contains exploratory tests with which critical errors can be detected in an efficient and fast way. In turn, we have good follow-up on our products, thanks to the fact that the tool allows us to document the commercial flows more critically and automate them.
Cons
- The quality of the testers should be better, so that all of them produce useful, excellent results, and not just some of them.
- The product could be improved with a more friendly interface and more tutorials to allow new users who do not have any kind of experience to easily adapt.
- It could also improve customer service.
Return on Investment
- Excellent impact since it allows precise tests before launching the applications, thus preventing capital losses.
- It helped us to carry a complete documentation of the tests thus reducing times.
- It reduced the problems that the developers of the organization had because the tests make sure that the new functions work excellently and the old functions do not get corrupted.
Alternatives Considered
QAComplete
Other Software Used
AttributeStudio, IBM Rational Functional Tester, Akamai CloudTest (formerly SOASTA), Apica LoadTest, AscentialTest, Attest360, Bqurious Test Automation Software, Bqurious Test Automation Software, CA Application Test, Hiptest, Adobe Campaign, Adobe Acrobat DC, Adobe AIR, Adobe Analytics, Adobe Audience Manager, Adobe Business Catalyst, Adobe Connect, Adobe Flash, Adobe Illustrator CC, Adobe LiveCycle Enterprise Suite 4