TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Zeplin

    Score6.8 out of 10
    N/AZeplin, from the company of the same name, is a platform supporting collaboration in application development by engineers and designers by providing an API with popular collaboration, development and prototyping tools and creating a space where productions can be shared and reviewed.

    $15

    per month

    zeroheight

    Score8.6 out of 10
    N/Azeroheight helps teams create, manage and maintain their design systems. Using zeroheight, designers, engineers, and product teams can collaborate and build design systems that can be easily shared across teams.

    $49

    month

    Pricing
    Zeplinzeroheight
    Editions & Modules
    Free
    $0
    up to 1 project
    Advanced
    $15
    per month per seat (up to 50 projects)
    Basic
    $15
    per month per project
    Enterprise
    Contact sales team
    Starter
    $49
    month
    Enterprise
    Custom Pricing
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Zeplinzeroheight
    Free Trial
    YesNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    YesYes
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Zeplinzeroheight
    Considered Both Products
    Zeplin
    No answer on this topic
    zeroheight
    Chose zeroheight
    I have used and still use Sketch and Zeplin too, but they serve other purposes for us. Sketch is used to design the components themselves and they are then exported to Zeroheight where they are showcased and enriched with textual information. Zeplin is used to design …
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    100%
    Would buy again
    9 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    8 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    78%
    Happy with the feature set
    7 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    83%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    5 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    6 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Features
    Zeplinzeroheight
    Project Management
    Comparison of Project Management features of Zeplin and zeroheight
    Feature
    Zeplin
    5.2
    2 Ratings
    39% below category average
    zeroheight
    -
    Ratings
    Search5.22 Ratings00 Ratings
    Communication
    Comparison of Communication features of Zeplin and zeroheight
    Feature
    Zeplin
    8.0
    2 Ratings
    1% above category average
    zeroheight
    -
    Ratings
    Notifications8.02 Ratings00 Ratings
    File Sharing & Management
    Comparison of File Sharing & Management features of Zeplin and zeroheight
    Feature
    Zeplin
    6.5
    3 Ratings
    18% below category average
    zeroheight
    -
    Ratings
    Versioning8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Document collaboration9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Access control5.23 Ratings00 Ratings
    Advanced security features4.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    Zeplinzeroheight
    Small Businesses
    Flock
    Score9.1 out of 10
    M‑Files
    Score8.9 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    Microsoft Viva Engage
    Score7.9 out of 10
    Esker
    Score10 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Google Keep
    Score9.9 out of 10
    Tungsten Capture
    Score8 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Zeplinzeroheight
    Likelihood to Recommend
    6.3
    (20 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    8.2
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Usability
    8.0
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Support Rating
    9.5
    (4 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Zeplinzeroheight
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Zeplin
    I still have some issues, especially with color integration between the style guide and also project. When we update the colors, it's not automatically sync to every project. Aside from that, zeplin solves my problem for hand-off design from design to developer. I set zeplin is source of truth design file
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    zeroheight
    For creating and maintaining a component library, it is a fantastic tool that creates an interface between Developers, UX Engineers and Designers. It is easy to get both general information about a component, but also incredibly detailed information when looking at the component on a pixel-level, where information on paddings, margins, colors, fonts etc. can be easily accessed.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Zeplin
    • Ease in automatically building design style guides, saving time that might be spent on building style guides in another tool (such as InDesign).
    • Users can use Mac, PC, or web versions of this app to collaborate on a single project, enabling us to work with a wider pool of contractors.
    • Accelerates the design-to-development workflow, as it’s very easy to import Sketch or Photoshop files through plug-ins, and HTML/CSS codes are automatically created based on designs.
    • Provides cross-platform specifications for web, iOS, and Android, which can save developers time in figuring out specifications beyond the “main platform" on their own.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    zeroheight
    • showcasing components and other topics
    • ease of seeing detailed information on components (colors, paddings, sizes etc.)
    • ease of finding information
    • possibility of going to previous versions of the design guideline
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Zeplin
    • The uploading and syncing of assets is great for sketch and photoshop but we use illustrator and that can be cumbersome/tedious at times.
    • There are certain elements that have been a bit confusing to navigate at times, but for the most part, it's pretty user-friendly
    • More integrations
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    zeroheight
    • when opening a component image (which opens a new page where the detailed information like paddings and colors are shown), the zoom can only be done by buttons, I'd prefer to be able to use my mouse scroll and for vertical / horizontal scrolling to do ctrl+scroll or ctrl+shift+scroll or something like that
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Zeplin
    Great tool
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    zeroheight
    No answers on this topic
    Usability
    Zeplin
    Zeplin's component management and style guide help us to be consistent across whole product and it so easy to use for non-technical person. It is now easy to collaboration for designes between different teams like stackholders, product owner, UI/UX, developers and testers. Now there is only one point of reference is Zeplin so it is so easy to get details without asking designer or developer again and again.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    zeroheight
    No answers on this topic
    Support Rating
    Zeplin
    Zeplin has classic support with a chat from the website. It's working fine, and we're also getting the support needed when needed. However, Zeplin is very good at closing the incidents and moving on. It was a while ago we had a case with their support so that it might have improved since then.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    zeroheight
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    Zeplin
    Zeplin is great to inspect and share user interfaces, specifications and assets, perfect for developers. Tools like InVision and Marvel are much better to create prototypes for both developers, coworkers and even stakeholders, but they don't have this kind of feature (inspection) as Zeplin does. So each of them can be used for different purposes, offering different approaches to share and interact with layouts for apps and websites.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    zeroheight
    I have used and still use Sketch and Zeplin too, but they serve other purposes for us. Sketch is used to design the components themselves and they are then exported to Zeroheight where they are showcased and enriched with textual information. Zeplin is used to design application pages, and again the components are exported to Zeplin from Sketch. But Zeroheight is mainly used for the development of the components themselves as well as a documentation for our design guideline in general. It is also used by us for design tokens and patterns, as well as other information on the design guideline, so if someone wants to understand the "why" of a design decision, the explanation can be usually found in Zeroheight too.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Zeplin
    • Development time has reduced as the design updates are communicated in real time to developers and they don't have to write the boilerplate code as it's already generated.
    • Employee engagement has improved as every stakeholder is aware about the design changes from the beginning and can give their inputs.
    • Designers save a lot of time as they don't to explicitly communicate when the update or publish their designs and also it just takes a couple of clicks to publish their designs. Also, lot of rework is saved as every stakeholder is involved right from the beginning.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    zeroheight
    • increased quality, as less misunderstandings or communication problems occur
    • increased speed of development, as it is a single source of truth for us. The developer can rely on the information in Zeroheight being correct so that he doesn't have to iterate his code again and again.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots