Workday Strategic Sourcing vs. Zip Intake-to-Procure

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Workday Strategic Sourcing
Score 7.9 out of 10
N/A
Workday Strategic Sourcing supports procurement by automating source-to-contract processes, from project intake to supplier management, and by surfacing contract obligations. It leverages Workday AI to provide insights and conversational tools that help teams identify savings opportunities and mitigate supplier risk.N/A
Zip Intake-to-Procure
Score 7.9 out of 10
Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
Zip provides a place for employees to initiate a purchase or vendor request. Each request is routed for approval across procurement, finance, IT, data security, legal, and other teams, and Zip integrates into ERP and P2P solutions to create a PR or draft PO. The vendor states Zip works with Canva, Checkr, Hopin, Zapier, CM Group, and other companies both public and private.N/A
Pricing
Workday Strategic SourcingZip Intake-to-Procure
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Workday Strategic SourcingZip Intake-to-Procure
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Workday Strategic SourcingZip Intake-to-Procure
User Ratings
Workday Strategic SourcingZip Intake-to-Procure
Likelihood to Recommend
9.1
(0 ratings)
7.7
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Workday Strategic SourcingZip Intake-to-Procure
Likelihood to Recommend
Workday Strategic Sourcing is great for contract pipeline and management, but I wish it was better integrated with Workday so that we could keep it "clean" when the dimensionality is changed or updated in our financial data model.
Read full review
Zip is a newer product in the P2P space, and as such there are still some areas for improvement. They don't have all the "bells and whistles" products and configurations that some of the other players in this space have, but the products they do offer are best in class. Zip is an ideal tool for tactical procurement.
Read full review
Pros
  • Contract Pipeline
  • Contract Management
  • Supplier Onboarding
Read full review
  • No coding - Ability for the administrator to make changes without development resources helps us be agile as a procurement org.
  • Visibility to the user in a great user interface
  • Accountability (helps us track SLAs on response time), Audit trails keeping track of everything
  • The implementation team was incredible, as is ongoing support. They want you to succeed in your goals vs. just implement their tool
Read full review
Cons
  • No way to flag where I need an internal colleague to review or add to an answer
  • No way to assign items to an internal team member for that person to answer a question
  • No status bar of the remaining items not yet answered
Read full review
  • Missing the ability to proxy as another user. Currently, if one approver did not set up their delegation, an admin or the approver of that step must reassign each of the approvals to another person.
  • Bulk upload options for admins to update queues and subqueues.
  • Missing ability to schedule reports or the option to share a saved view with another user. It would be easier if certain filtered views can be shared with others to avoid each user having to create their own views.
Read full review
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
Incredibly responsive and helpful.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
I have only used RFPIO to facilitate searching for RFP answers. I have used Scout RFP only to respond to customer RFPs. I assume they have functional overlap, but my interactions with each have not included this functional overlap. For each tool's respective use, I have found them very simple, intuitive, and helpful.
Read full review
Truth be told, we haven’t seen any other similar products. The alternative was manually tracking in Google Sheets, ticketing systems, and in NetSuite. Coupa was probably the closest in terms of what we were looking for but they were not willing to fit it to our needs like Zip was able to.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Ease of responding to RFPs and winning business
  • I don't have visibility into whether we have an actual $$$ of deals closed where we responded to the RFP within Scout RFP
  • Other departments of my company may use Scout RFP for sending out RFPs and collecting RFP responses, thus reducing costs to issue RFPs
Read full review
  • Zip Intake-to-Procure has helped clean up forecasting for us - we've improved accuracy by over 30% since now we're forcing folks to make sure spend is captured accurately and checking submitted PO amounts against the bottoms up forecast
  • We've also been able to leverage the SLA insights provided by Zip Intake-to-Procure to increase operational efficiencies. We're identified orgs that are slowing down the overall approval process and putting more pressure with shorter SLA times.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Workday Strategic Sourcing Screenshots

Screenshot of Workday Strategic Sourcing Contract Lifecycle ManagementScreenshot of Workday Strategic Sourcing Supplier Relationship ManagementScreenshot of Workday Strategic Sourcing Strategic Sourcing DashboardScreenshot of Spend Management

Zip Intake-to-Procure Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Zip supports ultra-configurable, parallel workflows with our no-code configuration.Screenshot of Zip also integrates with all major ticketing, CLM, GRC, and ERP/P2P solutions. Here's an example integration card for JIRA.Screenshot of Zip has an optional vendor-facing portal for the vendor to provide diligence materials, including documents, surveys, and even bank settlement information.Screenshot of Zip's vendor-facing portal includes an optional bank settlement form with an attestation.