| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 Webexpenses | Score9.2 out of 10 | N/A | Webexpenses is a global provider of spend management solutions, combining integrated Expense Cards with cloud-based software for businesses of all sizes across 70+ countries. Serving industries such as retail, finance, technology, construction, and not-for-profit, Webexpenses gives businesses control over company spending by automating processes, proactively enforcing policies, and controlling costs. Features The Webexpenses… | $54 per month (up to 15 users on the small business plan) |
| Webexpenses | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic | ||||||||||
| Offerings |
| ||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | $250 | ||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | ||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | |||||||||||
| Webexpenses | |
|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | Chose Webexpenses this platform was much easier to use. and the ledger was very helpful. Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info Chose Webexpenses Webexpenses is, from what I remember as it was about 6 years ago I used it, very similar to Concur. Find both easy to use. Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info Chose Webexpenses I am unable to provide any detail to this question as I have not used these products, but I am aware of these products and other applications. Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info Chose Webexpenses I was not part of the decision team; the system was introduced before I joined the company. Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info Chose Webexpenses I have used inhouse softwares before, however Webexpenses is far more user friendly. Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info |
| Key User Insights | |
| Would buy again | |
94% Would buy again 601 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | |
98% Delivers good value for the price 312 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | |
96% Happy with the feature set 623 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | |
98% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 197 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | |
96% Implementation went as expected 221 Answers | |
| Webexpenses | |||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Management |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Payment Management |
|
| Webexpenses | |
|---|---|
| Small Businesses |  Dext Score9.8 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies |  BILL Spend & Expense Score8.9 out of 10 |
| Enterprises |  Emburse Chrome River Score9.1 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Webexpenses | |
|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 9.1 |
| Likelihood to Renew | 9.2 |
| Usability | 9.1 |
| Availability | 9.3 |
| Performance | 9.6 |
| Support Rating | 8.6 |
| In-Person Training | 8.7 |
| Online Training | 9.8 |
| Implementation Rating | 7.8 |
| Configurability | 6.4 |
| Ease of integration | 7.2 |
| Product Scalability | 9.3 |
| Vendor post-sale | 8.7 |
| Vendor pre-sale | 9.1 |
| Webexpenses | |
|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
| Pros |
|
| Cons |
|
| Likelihood to Renew |
|
| Usability |
|
| Reliability and Availability |
|
| Performance |
|
| Support Rating |
|
| In-Person Training |
|
| Online Training |
|
| Implementation Rating |
|
| Alternatives Considered |
|
| Scalability |
|
| Return on Investment |
|
| ScreenShots | Webexpenses Screenshots      |
