Tebra EHR vs. Valant EHR

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Tebra EHR
Score 1.0 out of 10
N/A
Tebra (formerly Kareo) provides a full-featured EHR. It is designed to fit the way its users work. Some key features include: Comprehensive Dashboard, Scheduler, Documentation, and Notes.
$150
per provider/per month
Valant EHR
Score 7.0 out of 10
N/A
Valant, headquartered in Seattle, offers a Behavioral Health EHR and Practice Management Software. Valant is built exclusively for behavioral health. It is designed to increase the administrative and clinical efficiency of users' practices and includes built-in outcome measures, billing, reporting, telehealth, and clinical documentation tools, all tailored to the unique needs of mental health.N/A
Pricing
Tebra EHRValant EHR
Editions & Modules
Kareo Practice Management (Low Claim Volume)
$150
per provider/per month
Kareo Practice Management (Unlimited Claims)
$300
per provider/per month
Kareo Billing Services
Contact sales team
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Tebra EHRValant EHR
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Tebra EHRValant EHR
Features
Tebra EHRValant EHR
Billing and Claims Management
Comparison of Billing and Claims Management features of Product A and Product B
Tebra EHR
4.0
Ratings
61% below category average
Valant EHR
-
Ratings
Real-time eligibility verification4.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Claims management4.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Coding4.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Patient Scheduling
Comparison of Patient Scheduling features of Product A and Product B
Tebra EHR
1.0
Ratings
155% below category average
Valant EHR
-
Ratings
Calendar interface1.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Electronic Medical Records
Comparison of Electronic Medical Records features of Product A and Product B
Tebra EHR
2.2
Ratings
107% below category average
Valant EHR
-
Ratings
Charting / document management1.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Templates2.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Patient portal1.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Speech recognition7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Customization1.00 Ratings00 Ratings
E-prescribing1.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Medical Security and Privacy
Comparison of Medical Security and Privacy features of Product A and Product B
Tebra EHR
8.0
Ratings
4% below category average
Valant EHR
-
Ratings
HIPAA compliance8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
User Ratings
Tebra EHRValant EHR
Likelihood to Recommend
1.0
(0 ratings)
7.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
1.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
1.0
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Tebra EHRValant EHR
Likelihood to Recommend
We love the system. Very user-friendly and any level of user can pick up the system without training. Being a trainer myself, this is an awesome selling point. I have not found a specialty that cannot pick up and run with the program. Kareo has eliminated our "wasted" time and given us new avenues to use our resources more productively.
Read full review
Valant is a great space for front office to use in a patient/medical setting. I think it's best used on a small scale than a large scale. I have found it challenging at times with multiple locations and with about 3000 patients to keep track. Valant is excellent at record keeping, and communicating with the client via the patient portal. However, due to size and limited functionality - this would be hard to maintain for a larger scale.
Read full review
Pros
  • Catching missing patient info
  • Catching missing insurance info
  • Providing mailing addresses
Read full review
  • User Friendly - Valant is user friendly and easy to navigate
  • Record Keeping - it allows you to upload docs and files within the patient charts to keep on file at all times.
  • Scheduling - Easy to view and make/edit appointments
  • Access Management - easy to set features viewable by specific people only such as physicians versus nonclinical
  • Reporting - lots of reporting that can be used for a multitude of things from payment billing to notes, etc
Read full review
Cons
  • Sales representative needs to know the product. We got tied into a miscommunication on the package (contract vs trial) when we decided to work with them
  • Tutorials are good but can be overwhelming because there are a lot of features to learn
  • Charging to migrate client data was a determining factor on whether we wanted to continue with the company. If we knew this upfront it would've allowed us to say "no thanks". And to add the charges are not cheap and they charge a la carte (i.e., demographics, billing, progress notes, forms/intake info)
Read full review
  • BILLING- This is all Caps - There can be room for improvement in terms of billing efficiency
  • Automatic Reporting - this would be beneficial to set up or have as a feature
  • Billing Dashboard - to view all accounts that have matured or are outstanding
  • Batch Posting - be it insurances or specific patients. Even Superbills cannot be "chosen" by specific people - it's all clients with balances that are active or no balances and all charges but nothing that says you want statements for say these 20 people.
  • Appointment Recording - this could be more efficient versus one by one processing.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Kareo was a massive waste of money. It's an unreliable product without promised features and sold by a disingenuous sales team. We will stick to reliable services like Doxy, Therapy Notes, etc.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
The user interface is fine but it the app constantly freezes or crashes.
Read full review
It's very user friendly. The workspace is big, easy to read and navigate. Also, the resource knowledge base is great for when you have questions and there are several videos and guides for how to use or do something. I have had less than a year of using it and adopted it pretty quickly within the first 3 months.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
I have used QuickEMR and Kareo hands-down is just more appealing and easier to enter all patient information. I did find that QuickEMR for administrative staff is more user-friendly. Kareo provides more patient information and is very good about seeing what is missing in order to file a claim.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • ROI definitely a positive
Read full review
  • Labor efficiency - this has been negative. Billing has had a lot of manual processes that unfortunately take up a lot of man hours - if this were improved, I could see a ROI that's positive
  • Valant has been great at certain features including the "waitlist" to capture patients and improve our chances for revenue being increased
Read full review
ScreenShots

Valant EHR Screenshots

Screenshot of Includes Prospective Patient Management tools to access the integrated inquiry form, prospective patient database, and provider match algorithm.Screenshot of Billing reports enable the user to sort overdue, unbilled, and in-process claims.Screenshot of Valant's scheduler serves as a hub, allowing users to navigate to critical tasks with just the click of a mouse from any calendar appointment.Screenshot of Schedule clinical questionnaires and outcome measures - automatically sent prior to a client's upcoming appointments. Once the measure is complete, the auto-scored data and a clinically relevant narrative are automatically added into the clinical note.Screenshot of Prescribe and check patient medications in a snap with Valant's DrFirst integration.Screenshot of Valant's dashboard provides an at-a-glance view to keep the practice informed and organized. View tasks to be completed, take action on documents, appointment requests, and secure messages.