TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Tricentis qTest

    Score9 out of 10
    N/ATricentis qTest (formerly QASymphony) provides enterprise-level agile testing tools giving businesses visibility and control needed to ensure application quality in fast-paced development environments. Tricentis and QASymphony merged in summer 2018.

    $1,200

    per year per user

    Tricentis Tosca

    Score8.1 out of 10
    N/ATricentis Tosca provides an approach to test automation that is AI-powered, codeless, and end-to-end so it can test everything in a complex IT landscape, to ensure business processes work flawlessly no matter where changes occurs. Its 160+ technology support helps users test everything at the UI, API and data layer, including virtually any enterprise, custom, homegrown and mobile application. With its model-based approach, Tosca enables business, QA and IT teams to…N/A
    Pricing
    Tricentis qTestTricentis Tosca
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Tricentis qTestTricentis Tosca
    Free Trial
    YesNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    YesNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalOptional
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Tricentis qTestTricentis Tosca
    Considered Both Products
    Tricentis
    Chose Tricentis qTest
    qTest was in general easier to use and more intuitive in its layout
    Incentivized
    Chose Tricentis qTest
    Extensive integration options with various third-party tools, enabling seamless integration into existing workflows.
    Allows for flexibility and customization of workflows, fields, and permissions to adapt to unique testing requirements.
    Supports robust requirements traceability, …
    Incentivized
    Chose Tricentis qTest
    I have worked on Jira, but i found it more difficult interface to handle. It was not user friendly. The defect management was also not impressive. qTest experience actually helped me to take decision while evaluating.
    Incentivized
    Tricentis
    Chose Tricentis Tosca
    Even though Selenium is open source tool we have lot restriction in Selenium. Using Selenium we can automate only web based application. If we need to automate other application we work with other tools. Maintenance of Selenium code is complex when compare to Tricentis Tosca. …
    Incentivized
    Chose Tricentis Tosca
    Tricentis Tosca has more functionality and is easier to implement. It also has more compatibility with other applications, and the support is much more responsive.
    Incentivized
    Chose Tricentis Tosca
    qTest is the "brain" of the suite. You can use just Tricentis Tosca and can be enough to have results, but if you want have the management of executions, results and even manual test, this is your app.
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    74%
    Would buy again
    23 Answers
    96%
    Would buy again
    25 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    80%
    Delivers good value for the price
    20 Answers
    91%
    Delivers good value for the price
    21 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    90%
    Happy with the feature set
    28 Answers
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    26 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    75%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    15 Answers
    100%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    20 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    88%
    Implementation went as expected
    23 Answers
    96%
    Implementation went as expected
    23 Answers
    Features
    Tricentis qTestTricentis Tosca
    Test Management
    Comparison of Test Management features of Tricentis qTest and Tricentis Tosca
    Feature
    Tricentis qTest
    7.5
    27 Ratings
    7% below category average
    Tricentis Tosca
    -
    Ratings
    Centralized test management7.426 Ratings00 Ratings
    Manage test hosts and schedules7.223 Ratings00 Ratings
    Map tests to user stories7.68 Ratings00 Ratings
    Test execution reporting7.426 Ratings00 Ratings
    Defect management7.922 Ratings00 Ratings
    Automation Testing
    Comparison of Automation Testing features of Tricentis qTest and Tricentis Tosca
    Feature
    Tricentis qTest
    -
    Ratings
    Tricentis Tosca
    8.3
    4 Ratings
    2% below category average
    Record and Automate00 Ratings7.84 Ratings
    Multi-Browser Testing00 Ratings8.74 Ratings
    Mobile Testing00 Ratings7.43 Ratings
    Test Scheduling00 Ratings8.74 Ratings
    Test Management00 Ratings8.74 Ratings
    CI/CD Tool Integration00 Ratings8.04 Ratings
    Parallel Testing00 Ratings8.74 Ratings
    Object Recognition00 Ratings8.84 Ratings
    Data-Driven Testing00 Ratings8.84 Ratings
    Real Device Testing00 Ratings7.93 Ratings
    Testing Reports & Analytics00 Ratings8.24 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    Tricentis qTestTricentis Tosca
    Small Businesses
    No answers on this topic
    BrowserStack
    Score8.6 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    No answers on this topic
    BlazeMeter
    Score8.1 out of 10
    Enterprises
    No answers on this topic
    BlazeMeter
    Score8.1 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Tricentis qTestTricentis Tosca
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.1
    (29 ratings)
    8.3
    (19 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    6.0
    (2 ratings)
    7.7
    (2 ratings)
    Usability
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    3.6
    (13 ratings)
    Support Rating
    1.0
    (1 ratings)
    8.2
    (1 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    5.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Tricentis qTestTricentis Tosca
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Tricentis
    Tricentis qTest integrates seamlessly with Jira, making it ideal for teams that manage user stories and defects in Jira while keeping test cases and execution in qTest. When paired with automation tools like tosca, Selenium, or WebdriverIO, qTest is excellent for aggregating both manual and automated test results in one place.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Tricentis
    For projects having huge set of test cases to be automated can be accommodated by Tricentis Tosca with proper folder structure and best practices implementations. Tosca will be less appropriate for organizations where the number of automation scripts are limited with hardly any scope of increasing the script count or the cost of automation will be more than the cost of having manual resources as Tosca is a licensed tool.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Tricentis
    • As a fresher, when I started using qTest it was very handy and easy to understand.
    • It helps us trace the test cases that are used to test the quality in a single location
    • The main thing is its integration with JIRA as soon as we create a ticket we would be getting all the requirements in the qTest so it became easy for me
    Read full review
    Tricentis
    • Codeless - Easy to learn, Users can be trained quickly.
    • Modular approach - Reusable test step blocks can be created and used across multiple test cases.
    • Multiuser repository - Seamless collaboration between multiple team members in real-time.
    • Supports high number of technologies.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Tricentis
    • In requirements , we can't add multiple test cases at once, or search multiple cases at once, need to do one by one. Here actually qtest needs to improve.
    • Linking cloud hosted qtest and on-premise TOSCA is very difficult especially when you are working with client system with security wall. It requires tunnelling software which is not recommended.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Tricentis
    • Documentation - struggled multiple times with features not explained very well, or not explained at all
    • The only support is on Tricentis Forums, where, sometimes, based on 'luck' - you will open a support case, and wait few days until you get the chance to speak with someone from Tricentis and show case your issue
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Tricentis
    This has been a core QA management tool for our organization and integrates well with our other SDLC platforms (Azure DevOps/Jira/Katalon).
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Tricentis
    We aim to renew Tosca for our organization. What we lose in license cost is gained by having employee that do not need programming background. We also recoup a lot of the cost on the rapidity of automation. Only the support we might not use as much. I believe Tosca is here to stay at our organization
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Tricentis
    qTest is actually intuitive and user-friendly, despite my other scathing review aspects
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Tricentis
    It can be a challenge for new users who have never used an automation tool. For example, it is hard to understand the layout of the screen and where to find how to update the data. The interface can be overwhelming at first.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Tricentis
    The actual answer is 0. I have never experienced worse support, whether personal or professional
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Tricentis
    Tricentis team was very supportive. Support is expensive but they helped us at many level. Setting up timeline, implementation, precise questions on automation challenges. We had an account manager and technical people we could as to talk to. Support was generally timely and helping. They often proposed to come on site to help us which would cost more but could be helpful
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    In-Person Training
    Tricentis
    No answers on this topic
    Tricentis
    It would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterif the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterif the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterif the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterif the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterif the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterif the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterif the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterif the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterif the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterif the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterif the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterif the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterif the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterif the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterif the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterif the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterif the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterif the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterif the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is better
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Online Training
    Tricentis
    No answers on this topic
    Tricentis
    okIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is betterIt would be better if the support is better
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Implementation Rating
    Tricentis
    Again, supporting documentation could have been a lot better
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Tricentis
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    Tricentis
    All of them offer formidable solutions in the test management realm, but each one caters to different niche and need. qTest distinguishes itself with its deep integration capabilities, especially with Agile and DevOps tools, enabling streamlined CI/CD process. Its modern, user-centric interface contrasts with ALM's more dated appearance and complex setup. While TestRail provides a clean user experience and caters to a broad spectrum of business, qTest's scalability, from SMBs to large enterprises, stands out. PractiTest's cloud-based solution is geared towards mid-sized companies, but qTest's flexibility, advanced analytics, and robust reporting grant teams actionable insights. qTest' approach to a more holistic test management closely aligning with modern software development practices
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Tricentis
    Tricentis Tosca is codeless and therefore easier to use. It's a great tool for people that would start doing automation and have no coding background. It seems like it has the same capabilities as other test automation suites but I felt it lacked a bit of capabilities on the test management suite such as defects test suites organizations etc
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Tricentis
    • In comparison to other Testing tools, Tricentis qTest was the most expensive.
    • We were able to quickly bring international users up to speed on how to use the tool.
    • The ability to clone a project rather than create a new one from scratch was a valuable time saver.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Tricentis
    • It really had a very good impact on our ROI. We were able to automate most of the apps and layers with in it and get a very short execution time which led to increased releases with in short span of time.
    • Time to market really improved and efficiency of developing scripts was not too bad.
    • With built in test dashboards, it was easy to pull metrics and share the insights with management.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    Tricentis qTest Screenshots

    Screenshot of Customizable analytics and reports can be shared across the organization - additional read license requiredScreenshot of Centrally manage automated testing and environments, as well as schedule and or kickoff automated testing with any open source or proprietary toolScreenshot of qTest allows for true test case sharing across teams and projects to help standardize and scale knowledge and best practicesScreenshot of qTest integrates in real-time with Jira for full traceability to requirements during Agile test and developmentScreenshot of Build custom, event-driven workflows with any third-party solution, including ChatOps tools like Slack and Microsoft Teams, to streamline testing and drive collaborationScreenshot of Tricentis qTest comes with over 60 out-of-the-box metrics, with drag-and-drop capabilities to build custom dashboards

    Tricentis Tosca Screenshots

    Screenshot of where no-code, model-based test automation separates the technical information of an application into reusable, no-code modules that can be updated as applications change, which auto-updates test cases.Screenshot of a test case design for risk optimization - this displays a flexible testing model that enables fast, easy test case creation and maintenance and reduces risk in app releases.Screenshot of requirements coverage for risk optimization - this enables users to prioritize requirements by business risk/ impact, understand what is needed to test, and gain business insight on defects to ensure smarter and faster release decisions.Screenshot of Vision AI - AI powered test automation using patented neural network technology to deliver resilient UI automation. Includes self-healing AI capabilities.Screenshot of service virtualization, which enables users to build realistic, simulated services in minutes to remove bottlenecks and run end-to-end tests faster in the software development lifecycle.Screenshot of test data management. This offers test data when it is needed and helps keep track of the data as it gets consumed across end-to-end business processes.