TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    JMeter

    Score9.4 out of 10
    N/AJMeter, from Apache, is a load and performance testing tool.

    $0

    Tricentis NeoLoad

    Score9.3 out of 10
    N/ATricentis NeoLoad is a solution for continuous performance testing software to automate API and application load testing. It was developed by the French company Neotys and acquired by Tricentis, along with the company, in March 2021.

    $20,000

    per year with 300 virtual users

    Pricing
    JMeterTricentis NeoLoad
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    JMeterTricentis NeoLoad
    Free Trial
    NoYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    YesNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
    Additional Details
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    JMeterTricentis NeoLoad
    Considered Both Products
    Apache
    Chose JMeter
    It's very easy GUI helps the tester to perform various testing scenarios. Easy to configure test cases and modules which has proper and well-maintained documentation. Its an excellent tool for performance testing and running a variety of load tests, stress tests, and longevity …
    Incentivized
    Chose JMeter
    I have evaluated LOADUI (web free version) and it was a very unstable tool and I could not rely on those results completely as I was not sure how the tool was performing. It only generated the top 10 less transaction times and when Jmeter was in use, it was very effective in …
    Incentivized
    Chose JMeter
    NeoLoad is far ahead of JMeter in terms of reporting and user interface, the turn around time is less compared to JMeter as there are enough experts in market.
    Incentivized
    Tricentis
    Chose Tricentis NeoLoad
    When we used Apache JMeter we faced some problems like less documentation is available for integrating tools, and some integrations have not yet been deployed. Very few plugin updates are made. Since customer support is an open source tool, it is a major problem. While …
    Incentivized
    Chose Tricentis NeoLoad
    We discovered that recording and playing back the performance scripts was easier than with JMeter.The application features an easy-to-use interface that allows us to record and run the script locally before attempting to run it through the Tricentis NeoLoad Web site.In order to …
    Incentivized
    Chose Tricentis NeoLoad
    When I used Apache JMeter in our organization, I faced a problem with its user interface, which was quite hard to understand. New and beautiful UI/UX designs can greatly improve the usability of the user interface. So we decided to switch to Tricentis Neoload, and we are happy …
    Incentivized
    Chose Tricentis NeoLoad
    One major difference between the two tools is that Apache JMeter is an open-source tool, while Tricentis NeoLoad is a commercial product. Although Apache JMeter is free to use and Tricentis NeoLoad requires a license to use, Tricentis NeoLoad is more feature-rich and …
    Incentivized
    Chose Tricentis NeoLoad
    Its tools are very compatible with both Windows,Linus & can be reuse & share our test-suite & results to certain analytics. Neoload has good support of many protocols. like enterprise software SAP Oracle Siebel etc as compared to Apache JMeter.
    Moreover; for value-added & with …
    Incentivized
    Chose Tricentis NeoLoad
    Because of noted as below points we leaning towards Tricentis NeoLoad over other tools: Easy to use, faster test design, script customization, real time test monitoring, IP spoofing, mobile testing, scalability, easy to setup and maintain, record and playback capability, …
    Incentivized
    Chose Tricentis NeoLoad
    in upper middle field
    Incentivized
    Chose Tricentis NeoLoad
    Tricentis NeoLoad is easier to use, with simpler steps to follow to record/write test scripts and to design scenarios. It is scalable and comparatively provides overall benefits in a fair cost. Neoload also provides APIs for anyone to leverage and build on top of the existing …
    Incentivized
    Chose Tricentis NeoLoad
    It outperformed all of the above mentioned tools in many aspects
    Incentivized
    Chose Tricentis NeoLoad
    Tricentis NeoLoad stacks up against them as it is generally used where there are many websites or applications with large number of users. It is less expensive and provides some additional functionlities than the other tools available in the market. It ensures if any website …
    Incentivized
    Chose Tricentis NeoLoad
    We used Jenkins for manual performance testing and had big efforts to script and evaluate the test results. Furthermore, the effort of maintaining and editing the scripts was very high. To generate a report, many tables must be analyzed. The efforts of these tasks are minimized …
    Incentivized
    Chose Tricentis NeoLoad
    NeoLoad is more SAP-centric and offers use cases a lot closer to what we experiment on a daily basis. The main competition in the space would be loadrunner but it lacks the flexibility of NeoLoad, and also comes at a much higher price in a way that would have hurt our …
    Incentivized
    Chose Tricentis NeoLoad
    NeoLoad's ability to provide accurate visual test results in GUI saves developer time. NeoLoad's focus on Load Testing saves developer time when compared to combing thru details of 3 or 4 other products we evaluated. NeoLoad's ability to view live testing metrics/results …
    Incentivized
    Chose Tricentis NeoLoad
    In small projects open source tools like JMeter are the hardest competitors because money is a reliable metric. But NeoLoad offers a value in case of reporting and scalability. The standard reports are very comprehensive and easy to understand for stakeholders. It takes much …
    Incentivized
    Chose Tricentis NeoLoad
    Not use but for my customer, integration with tosca and qtest
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    100%
    Would buy again
    6 Answers
    96%
    Would buy again
    22 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    6 Answers
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    22 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    6 Answers
    91%
    Happy with the feature set
    21 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    100%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    5 Answers
    94%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    17 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    6 Answers
    95%
    Implementation went as expected
    20 Answers
    Features
    JMeterTricentis NeoLoad
    Load Testing
    Comparison of Load Testing features of Apache JMeter and Tricentis NeoLoad
    Feature
    Apache JMeter
    7.5
    24 Ratings
    11% below category average
    Tricentis NeoLoad
    -
    Ratings
    End to end performance management9.021 Ratings00 Ratings
    Integrated performance data8.922 Ratings00 Ratings
    Deployment model flexibility6.321 Ratings00 Ratings
    Real time monitoring8.921 Ratings00 Ratings
    Automated anomaly detection4.418 Ratings00 Ratings
    User Ratings
    JMeterTricentis NeoLoad
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.1
    (39 ratings)
    7.7
    (24 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    8.6
    (12 ratings)
    7.3
    (1 ratings)
    Usability
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    7.3
    (3 ratings)
    Availability
    1.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Performance
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Support Rating
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    3.6
    (3 ratings)
    Online Training
    1.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    6.4
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    JMeterTricentis NeoLoad
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Apache
    No answers on this topic
    Tricentis
    No answers on this topic
    Pros
    Apache
    • Easy of use - in generate load like HTTP requests, and processing/analyzing the responses. No coding is necessary at the basic level, just need to understand load testing and the infrastructure being tested.
    • Automatic management of things like cookies to help with session state support - so you don't specifically have to worry about it or handle it
    • Lots of testing/configuration options to suit your needs in making the right load generation (sampling requests), and analyzing the results, including any pre and post processing of the results first. Things like the Beanshell/BSF pre/post processors, response assertion, regular expression extractor, XPath extractor, CSV data set config
    • There is a JMeter cloud service called BlazeMeter that I think would be useful for those that need to scale up high load without provisioning their own systems. I've not personally tried it though, but I recently attended a meetup presentation that highlighted nice useful features that BlazeMeter provides. One should evaluate the service if they are considering JMeter and need to expand beyond existing hardware resources.
    Read full review
    Tricentis
    No answers on this topic
    Cons
    Apache
    • Jmeter requires many tweaks with respect to its configuration file and thread properties. users need to edit theses files themselves. There could be some interface where we can edit this fields.
    • Jmeter cannot handle more threads and hangs up when we increase the number of threads. This causes lot of inconvenience. In these situations, user can be notified that such change would be lead to slow performance so that user can do as required. The same appears when we try to view huge files on graph listener.
    • Jmeter should optimize the read and write access to output csv since it acts as overhead to the I/O performance. This affects our test results for the application which we are testing.
    Read full review
    Tricentis
    No answers on this topic
    Likelihood to Renew
    Apache
    Price, Wiki and user sharing. Having access to the information provided by the developers and other open source providers is key for me. The ability to share information and get answers directly is very important to success in software testing. And the price of this product currently is amazing. Too many companies charge way too much money for products that are far behind in their value and pertinence
    Read full review
    Tricentis
    We find NeoLoad easy to use compared to their competitors. It requires minimal coding knowledge, also it is easy to train newcomers with NeoLoad. It also offers good integration and automation capability where with less code you can automate your testing process
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Apache
    I can jump right into a new test plan and start building from scratch. The natural progression from test plan to thread group and then designing the basic format of the process is very streamlined and smooth. With only slight modifications I can build out a very complex model from a very basic beginning.
    Read full review
    Tricentis
    No answers on this topic
    Support Rating
    Apache
    No answers on this topic
    Tricentis
    This is the only area where we strongly feel Tricentis needs to improve. Their support process is inadequate, representatives are not so capable of providing solutions at one shot without consulting their internal engineering teams. Most importantly, the time they take to resolve simple issues is huge and at many times hampered our work.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Implementation Rating
    Apache
    No answers on this topic
    Tricentis
    1. Their documentation is scattered over many places like GitHub read me files, their internal website etc;
    2. Support team takes huge time just to acknowledge our ticket
    3. No support to automatically migrate scripts from competetor tool into
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Apache
    No answers on this topic
    Tricentis
    When we used Apache JMeter we faced some problems like less documentation is available for integrating tools, and some integrations have not yet been deployed. Very few plugin updates are made. Since customer support is an open source tool, it is a major problem. While Tricentis Neoload provides better documentations and customer services.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Apache
    No answers on this topic
    Tricentis
    • Performance testing is like an insurance. An online store which is not available causes a loss of sales. Without a performance test you do not know if it might happen. The invest into performance tests reduces the risk of loosing sales. The flexible license model of NeoLoad allows or customers to choose reasonable and suiteable rate.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    Tricentis NeoLoad Screenshots

    Screenshot of Code-less design — loops, conditions, and other drag and drop controls simplify test design creation, and JavaScript can still be used for extremely advanced cases.Screenshot of CI/CD integrations — collaborate across dev, QA, operations, and business teams to create a standardized performance testing approach throughout the enterprise.Screenshot of Real-time test results — analyze test results live to react to an anomaly before the test is over. And leverage in-depth test reporting when the test is completed.Screenshot of Collaborate on test result as the test is runningScreenshot of Configure SaaS-based performance testScreenshot of Dashboard for team analysis