Adobe Dynamic Tag Management (DTM) was a tool used by marketers to manage tags, and for collecting and distributing data across digital marketing systems. Adobe DTM is a legacy, and it will not receive feature updates. Adobe invites users to upgrade to Launch on the Adobe Experience Platform.
N/A
TransUnion TruAudience
Score 7.0 out of 10
N/A
TruAudience from TransUnion, which contains technology from Signal Tag Management and Neustar Marketing, is a solution that aims to help marketers, web analysts and agencies establish autonomy from IT development cycles, accelerate the launch of new data-driven initiatives and campaigns while significantly improving website performance.
N/A
Pricing
Adobe Dynamic Tag Management (discontinued)
TransUnion TruAudience
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Adobe Dynamic Tag Management (discontinued)
TransUnion TruAudience
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Adobe Dynamic Tag Management (discontinued)
TransUnion TruAudience
Features
Adobe Dynamic Tag Management (discontinued)
TransUnion TruAudience
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
Adobe Dynamic Tag Management (discontinued)
10.0
Ratings
22% above category average
TransUnion TruAudience
9.0
Ratings
12% above category average
Role-based user permissions
10.00 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Tag Management
Comparison of Tag Management features of Product A and Product B
Adobe Dynamic Tag Management (discontinued)
9.4
Ratings
18% above category average
TransUnion TruAudience
8.4
Ratings
7% above category average
Tag library
9.00 Ratings
7.00 Ratings
Tag variable mapping
10.00 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Ease of writing custom tags
10.00 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Rules-driven tag execution
9.00 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Tag performance monitoring
10.00 Ratings
10.00 Ratings
Page load times
10.00 Ratings
7.00 Ratings
Mobile app tagging
10.00 Ratings
7.00 Ratings
Library of JavaScript extensions
7.10 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Data Management & Integrity
Comparison of Data Management & Integrity features of Product A and Product B
Dynamic Tag Management allows you to tag any data elements on a page in order to track every aspect of your customer's journey. Its ease of use and the ability to deploy tags without having to involve a web developer leaves marketing to iterate without the lag time of a code release. I haven't found any areas where improvement is needed.
Signal becomes as flexible as any other tag management solution if you're able define the data layer requirements clearly to your development team. The interface is very outdated if you're coming from Google Tag Manager. You might have to know some sort of JavaScript if you plan to make changes to the properties of some tags.
Single Page Applications: While it's greatly improved over the years, being able to accurately target certain actions on single page applications. In particular, applications built on React are difficult. The addition of a hash change trigger was quite useful, but more is definitely needed.
Data Elements: Great new tool, but I need it to be easier to create. I'm not an inherently technical individual, and the main benefit of tag management is reducing the need for technical people.
We are deeply ingrained in BrightTag and very pleased with its performance, but there is always the possibility that another tool with features we have not considered or are even aware of may come along that makes transitioning to a new platform a worthwhile endeavor (perhaps one that integrates A/B Testing or a Personalization engine into the TMS framework)
Based on the features and current usage. It shows some buggy pages plus the service and support is really very slow. The updates are not regular and company needs to work on that. The usability is good and reporting of tags is accurate which is the best part. The pricing of the product is good and can be used by organizations of all sizes.
Although it is a newer product to Adobe, they seem to truly care about our challenges and are very proactive in making sure that we have the most knowledgeable support available in a timely manner.
Support is really slow and it takes days to resolve an issue. Plus we have to inquire regularly for the status of resolution. Company should definitely work towards that
The one thing GTM has over DTM is that there are a bunch of hosted pixels by companies like Facebook. Otherwise, it's incredibly inferior. The DTM UI is easier, more intuitive, and more comprehensible. Debugging is easier as well, and the triggers are better defined in DTM. Version control is far superior and it's so easy to tell what tags are firing and when. I went from DTM to GTM when switching jobs and was so relieved when my new company made the switch to DTM. I'm much happier and it's much easier now.
I believe Slack does work better than Signal for PC and office-oriented teams, but found that signal was the go-to for a rapidly growing and dismantling structure like a campaign. The Mobile interface, and the use of cell phone numbers rather than emails as a form of verification and a basis of identity makes it perfect for a campaign environment
Excellent ROI investment "if" strategy and roll out are prioritized appropriately. Because this is a custom solution, Adobe does not provide this level of guidance.
From a project management timeline perspective, if the team rolling this out tries to tag everything, then they will quickly run out of time and overextend resource hours.
BrightTag has enabled us to cut down the number of times that specific pages are tagged. Tagging a site numerous times slows a page down thus decreasing the user experience.
Brighttag has allowed us to easy collect and house tag information, therefore increasing our customer service.