Fathom is a management reporting, forecasting and financial analysis tool from the Access Group. It helps users to assess business performance, monitor trends and identify improvement opportunities. Fathom combines business planning with simple three-way cash flow forecasting.
$44
per month
Workday Adaptive Planning
Score 7.8 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
Workday Adaptive Planning streamlines planning workflows, using AI and real-time data integration to improve collaboration and provide predictive forecasts for better strategic analysis.
N/A
Pricing
Fathom by The Access Group
Workday Adaptive Planning
Editions & Modules
Starter
$44
per month
Silver
$225
per month
Gold
$325
per month
Platinum
$575
per month
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Fathom by The Access Group
Workday Adaptive Planning
Free Trial
Yes
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
Optional
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Fathom by The Access Group
Workday Adaptive Planning
Features
Fathom by The Access Group
Workday Adaptive Planning
Budgeting, Planning, and Forecasting
Comparison of Budgeting, Planning, and Forecasting features of Product A and Product B
Fathom by The Access Group
7.8
Ratings
18% below category average
Workday Adaptive Planning
9.6
Ratings
15% above category average
Long-term financial planning
7.00 Ratings
9.50 Ratings
Financial budgeting
9.00 Ratings
9.80 Ratings
Forecasting
6.00 Ratings
9.60 Ratings
Management reporting
9.00 Ratings
9.50 Ratings
Scenario modeling
00 Ratings
9.60 Ratings
Analytics and Reporting
Comparison of Analytics and Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Fathom by The Access Group
8.0
Ratings
2% below category average
Workday Adaptive Planning
8.8
Ratings
9% above category average
KPIs
8.00 Ratings
9.50 Ratings
Cost and profitability analysis
8.00 Ratings
8.70 Ratings
Key Performance Indicator setting
8.00 Ratings
8.90 Ratings
Revenue Forecasting
8.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Personalized dashboards
00 Ratings
8.50 Ratings
Color-coded scorecards
00 Ratings
9.20 Ratings
Benchmarking with external data
00 Ratings
8.10 Ratings
Budgeting Tools
Comparison of Budgeting Tools features of Product A and Product B
Fathom by The Access Group
6.5
Ratings
26% below category average
Workday Adaptive Planning
-
Ratings
Financial Planning Collaboration
7.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Budget Customization
8.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Departmental Budgeting
4.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Import & Export Tools
7.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
BI Standard Reporting
Comparison of BI Standard Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Fathom by The Access Group
-
Ratings
Workday Adaptive Planning
9.3
Ratings
20% above category average
Pixel Perfect reports
00 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Customizable dashboards
00 Ratings
10.00 Ratings
Report Formatting Templates
00 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Ad-hoc Reporting
Comparison of Ad-hoc Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Fathom by The Access Group
-
Ratings
Workday Adaptive Planning
8.0
Ratings
2% below category average
Drill-down analysis
00 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Formatting capabilities
00 Ratings
7.00 Ratings
Integration with R or other statistical packages
00 Ratings
8.00 Ratings
Report sharing and collaboration
00 Ratings
8.00 Ratings
Report Output and Scheduling
Comparison of Report Output and Scheduling features of Product A and Product B
Fathom by The Access Group
-
Ratings
Workday Adaptive Planning
8.0
Ratings
3% below category average
Publish to PDF
00 Ratings
8.00 Ratings
Report Versioning
00 Ratings
8.00 Ratings
Report Delivery Scheduling
00 Ratings
8.00 Ratings
Data Discovery and Visualization
Comparison of Data Discovery and Visualization features of Product A and Product B
In a previous company, I was hired based on my experience with Workday Adaptive Planning. After being hired and reviewing the company, I quickly determined they were not large of enough of a company to need the program. Instead, we made better Excel budget templates, utilized OneDrive and created a better experience without the cost. Left the job after 9 months because I worked my way out of the position. My next role I looked for bigger companies and had better success with implementation.
Version Management. Adaptive lets us manage many versions/scenarios all in one platform with the robust ability to compare them to each other.
Processing Performance. With the Elastic Hypercube technology that was implemented a few years back, we can watch changes flow through a complex web of formulas and arrive at an answer within seconds.
Audit Trail. Our administrators love the ability to see and report on who made what changes when, which leads to real accountability within the organization.
Web reports and sheets are not great for in-depth reporting, and require the use of the OfficeConnect for Excel plugin and, therefore, the use of Excel for extensive reporting capabilities.
It has limited formula functionality in some instances, requiring again the use of OfficeConnect for Excel for extensive calculations.
I would like to see new planning sheet types or upgrades to existing sheet types; functionality has been the same for over 10 years.
For one we're in way too deep to not move forward with Adaptive. We're integrated with Workday, we do a ton of reporting with Adaptive, and it's working very well for planning and forecasting. No reason to look back or change course.
Workday Adaptive Planning has detailed online help with both articles and videos that are comprehensive. It has a lot of similarities to Excel, which most finance people are already familiar with, plus the user interface is intuitive and easy to pick up. The online support team is quick to respond and very knowledgeable.
There haven't been any lately. The only one issue I can think of is when there was an update in Adaptive that altered our reports. Before I realized there was an issue, Adaptive reached out to let me know, so that it could be fixed.
All aspects of Adaptive Insights perform well. One area that I wish was quicker was integration. When importing data from Intacct our accounting ERP platform, it can sometimes take 4 hours for the import to process. The earlier imports are done, the quicker they complete. My estimate for a quick upload is about two hours.
Whenever we have had any questions, issues, or concerns, the support has been quick and thorough. [This] allow[s] us to be able to fully resolve any issues, or be connected with the right group quickly to attain the result we were after; be it from simple formatting to adding new detailed reporting.
This was extremely helpful so that they could walk you through the model and teach you more about the complexity of various areas. It is most helpful when it is specific to your organization's model. The larger in-person trainings were helpful but they tended to be more generic and entry level. The trainings that are more tailored to your specific needs are the most helpful.
They often times tended to be way too generic or entry level. They would also become sales pitches to upgrade or get new Adaptive Planning products. The questions in the training would be very niche and specific to other organizations. They were rarely helpful to the group at large.
Trust the expertise of very strong 3rd party implementers. Having deployed Adaptive at a separate company before, I thought I knew it all (hubris, I know). Fortunately, I began to (very quickly) trust the judgment of our Carlson implementation team, and they provided invaluable insights and best-in-class processes that have benefitted me and my team greatly.
We also used Spotlight reporting before we tried out Fathom and we found Fathom much easier to navigate and Xero integration, consolidation are very strong feature of the product. Spotlight reporting is similar to Fathom however, Fathom is more flexible, there are better visual reports and grafts and we found it easier to customize the reports templates. You can also share the reports with multiple group of people online.
For best-in-class capabilities, you'll very likely need to split the various HR and financial systems into separate systems rather than using a consolidated platform like Workday. However, a consolidated platform provides benefits by being a single location for employees and a single system for IT developers to work with. This would need to be compared to employee efficiencies gained by working with better systems.
We went from 2 users to 70+ users over a 2 year period of time. The application scaled wonderfully. 65 of those users were non-finance users so they were able to quickly learn the software and prepare budgets quickly and efficiently. That is the power of Adaptive and its ability to scale