TestGrid vs. Testlum

Easy navigation. Test Data Management. Flexible Supports for Automation Testing Sometimes it fails to connect to cloud devices or browsers

Testlum has a low code, which is why we chose this tool. We freed up our testers' time for more complex tasks and increased efficiency as a result.

• Low barrier to entry for beginner test engineer due to scriptless nature of test case
• Proficient test engineer could utilize CI/CD Integration
• Both Browser & Mobile Device Infrastructure Available Natively

• Can be slow in instances where multiple scripts and requests are running on a webpage plus the docs can also be improved

We did not find any disadvantages in using Testlum and were completely satisfied

We frequently came across scenarios which were too cumbersome for manual testing & wanted an easy automation solution. We are now using TestGrid for those scenarios & are happy with the product.

We chose Testlum over other testing tools for several reasons. Unlike some competitors, it is low-code. All our testers are manual QA engineers, and we needed an easy-to-start automated solution. The second reason is that we wanted a centralized tool to avoid switching between different products. Compared to other tools, Testlum excels in its ease of integration. Plus, its team support and documentation make troubleshooting and learning new features easy.

• we were looking for a remote infrastructure provider so that our remote team could use it for automation as well as manual testing.