TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    TestComplete

    Score8 out of 10
    N/ATestComplete is a GUI test automation tool that enables users of all skill levels to test the UI of every desktop, web, and mobile application. TestComplete is best suited for testers, automation engineers, and QA teams in any industry.

    $2,256

    per license

    Testlum

    Score10 out of 10
    N/ATestlum is a low-code testing tool with an XML-based structure designed to provide ease of use and efficiency for QA specialists.N/A
    Pricing
    TestCompleteTestlum
    Editions & Modules
    Node-Locked Base
    2,256
    per license
    Node-Locked Pro
    3,950
    per license
    Float - Base
    5,077
    per license
    Float - Pro
    7,901
    per license
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    TestCompleteTestlum
    Free Trial
    YesNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional DetailsPay for only the modules needed. TestComplete Pro includes all three modules: desktop, web, and mobile, at a bundled price point, as well as access to the parallel testing engine, TestExecute. TestComplete has additional add-ons, including TestExecute and the Intelligent Quality Add-On.—
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    TestCompleteTestlum
    Considered Both Products
    SmartBear
    No answer on this topic
    Testlum
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    93%
    Would buy again
    25 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    88%
    Delivers good value for the price
    22 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    93%
    Happy with the feature set
    25 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    85%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    22 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    85%
    Implementation went as expected
    22 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Features
    TestCompleteTestlum
    Automation Testing
    Comparison of Automation Testing features of TestComplete and Testlum
    Feature
    TestComplete
    -
    Ratings
    Testlum
    10.0
    3 Ratings
    17% above category average
    Record and Automate00 Ratings10.03 Ratings
    Multi-Browser Testing00 Ratings10.03 Ratings
    Mobile Testing00 Ratings10.03 Ratings
    Test Scheduling00 Ratings10.03 Ratings
    Test Management00 Ratings10.03 Ratings
    CI/CD Tool Integration00 Ratings10.03 Ratings
    Integrated Version Control00 Ratings10.03 Ratings
    Parallel Testing00 Ratings10.03 Ratings
    Object Recognition00 Ratings10.03 Ratings
    Data-Driven Testing00 Ratings10.03 Ratings
    Testing Collaboration00 Ratings10.03 Ratings
    Real Device Testing00 Ratings10.03 Ratings
    Testing Reports & Analytics00 Ratings10.03 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    TestCompleteTestlum
    Small Businesses
    No answers on this topic
    BrowserStack
    Score8.6 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    OpenText UFT One
    Score7.6 out of 10
    BlazeMeter
    Score8.1 out of 10
    Enterprises
    SoapUI Open Source
    Score8.7 out of 10
    Tricentis Tosca
    Score8.1 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    TestCompleteTestlum
    Likelihood to Recommend
    7.0
    (88 ratings)
    10.0
    (3 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    8.1
    (6 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Usability
    7.8
    (7 ratings)
    10.0
    (3 ratings)
    Support Rating
    6.6
    (7 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    6.7
    (4 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    TestCompleteTestlum
    Likelihood to Recommend
    SmartBear
    Best suited to smaller unit test or tests broken up, couple of forms at a time Not suited - larger regressions test involving multiple systems. - my main regression involving payments has been unsuccessful for the last 3 years despite all working fine separately and while being watched
    Read full review
    Testlum
    Testlum is particularly well-suited for automating regression and functional testing in projects with a well-defined structure. For example, we’ve effectively used it to automate all testing processes for our education platform. Its unlimited integration capabilities and that we could add custom integrations helped us a lot. We’ve found that Testlum provides great support for all testing needs, and we have no problems maintaining test stability.
    Read full review
    Pros
    SmartBear
    • Identifying UI objects and application structure
    • Expandability of tests through scripts and script extensions/plugins
    • low barrier of entry (you can get started quickly, and other's don't need much explanation to contribute on a basic level)
    • Possibility of Jira integration for reporting
    • Relatively few (and usually easy to solve) git conflicts when working simultaneously
    • easy handling of test data, also for iterative tests
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Testlum
    No answers on this topic
    Cons
    SmartBear
    • TestComplete could stand to have a simplified view for different types of users. For instance, as a manager/architecture guy, I'm not so interested in getting into the code and am more interested in file-based interactions.
    • TestComplete could use more integration with reporting for things like TeamCity to improve test status visibility.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Testlum
    No answers on this topic
    Likelihood to Renew
    SmartBear
    We have bigger test automation pack using test complete at the same time we also think this is not good performing tool for large number of test automation scripts.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Testlum
    No answers on this topic
    Usability
    SmartBear
    It is usable when you become accustomed to its quirks. Not using it for two months and then you need to re-learn the quirks for some features (but some quirks are so awful that they will never fade from your memory). So, when using it regularly, it is possible to be quite productive, if no big correction in name mapping is needed.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Testlum
    We would like to share a good experience using Testlum
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    SmartBear
    Some bugs were quickly resolved, but most UX quirks of the tool are just marked "as designed". No follow up for enhancement request.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Testlum
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation Rating
    SmartBear
    If you develop a mobile application and your testing process goes in cloud, probably you will face a problem - how to implement a stable connection between your mobile devices and testing servers
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Testlum
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    SmartBear
    TestComplete stacks up against them in terms of GUI and seamless performance. It records each and every step and action been performed in the application and produces a detailed report in a well-structured manner. It can connect and access seamlessly among various databases directly to speed up the testing process.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Testlum
    Due to the fact that Testlum is a low-code tool, which really makes it easier to work with it. It was also a recommendation from our partners.
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    SmartBear
    • Saves hundreds of man-hours with either QA testing or data entry
    • With the small cost of the product, it has saved the company money with both employee costs as well as the cost of mistakes made by human error or software bugs
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Testlum
    No answers on this topic
    ScreenShots