Test Evolve vs. Tricentis qTest
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 Test Evolve | Score10 out of 10 | N/A | Test Evolve is an automated testing tool used to ensure optimal quality and performance of software products. It helps software development teams to streamline the testing process and achieve faster release cycles. Test Evolve's Key Features: Test Automation: Test Evolve automates functional, regression, and load testing, freeing up developers' time and resources. Cross-Browser and Platform Testing: Test Evolve helps to ensure that software works seamlessly on… | $79 per month per seat |
 Tricentis qTest | Score9 out of 10 | N/A | Tricentis qTest (formerly QASymphony) provides enterprise-level agile testing tools giving businesses visibility and control needed to ensure application quality in fast-paced development environments. Tricentis and QASymphony merged in summer 2018. | $1,200 per year per user |
| Test Evolve | Tricentis qTest | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | Optional | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Test Evolve | Tricentis qTest | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
No answers on this topic | 74% Would buy again 23 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
No answers on this topic | 80% Delivers good value for the price 20 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
No answers on this topic | 90% Happy with the feature set 28 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | 75% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 15 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
No answers on this topic | 88% Implementation went as expected 23 Answers | |
| Test Evolve | Tricentis qTest | |||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Test Management |
| |||||||||||||||||||
| Test Evolve | Tricentis qTest | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | - | 8.1 |
| Likelihood to Renew | - | 6.0 |
| Usability | - | 8.0 |
| Support Rating | - | 1.0 |
| Implementation Rating | - | 5.0 |
| Test Evolve | Tricentis qTest | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic |
| Pros | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic |
| Cons | No answers on this topic |
|
| Likelihood to Renew | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic |
| Usability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Support Rating | No answers on this topic |
|
| Implementation Rating | No answers on this topic |
|
| Alternatives Considered | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic |
| Return on Investment | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic |
| ScreenShots | Test Evolve Screenshots    | Tricentis qTest Screenshots      |
