TensorFlow vs. Toric

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
TensorFlow
Score 8.1 out of 10
N/A
TensorFlow is an open-source machine learning software library for numerical computation using data flow graphs. It was originally developed by Google.N/A
Toric
Score 0.0 out of 10
N/A
Toric is a smart data-workspace where the user can leverage all data in one place. Toric is used by Architecture & Planning, Civil Engineering, Construction, Real Estate operations, and developers to leverage their existing data. Using Toric, companies can combine design, project, and finance data in one place for real-time analysis, insights, and decision making. Toric integrates with software tools, desktop tools and APIs, removing the need to maintain expensive ETL and data…N/A
Pricing
TensorFlowToric
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
TensorFlowToric
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
TensorFlowToric
Best Alternatives
TensorFlowToric
Small Businesses
InterSystems IRIS
InterSystems IRIS
Score 7.7 out of 10
Jupyter Notebook
Jupyter Notebook
Score 9.4 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Posit
Posit
Score 10.0 out of 10
Posit
Posit
Score 10.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Posit
Posit
Score 10.0 out of 10
Posit
Posit
Score 10.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
TensorFlowToric
Likelihood to Recommend
6.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
9.1
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
8.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
TensorFlowToric
Likelihood to Recommend
  1. Whenever the problem has the demand for a neural networks based solution, Tensorflow (TF) is a great fit.
  2. The tf.dataset API makes it really simple to create complex data pipelines in a few lines of code.
  3. tf.estimators API abstracts all the complex computation graph creation logic making it very simple to get started.
  4. Eager execution makes it simple to develop a TF graph as debugging the code would be like any other imperative Python program.
  5. TF abstracts all the complexities of scaling it to multiple machines. It has various code and data distribution algorithms ready to use.
  6. Projects like TensorBoard make monitoring the training process really easy. It also gives the ability to view embeddings without any extra code. Their What-If is extremely useful for poking and understanding a black box model. It also has tools to visualize data to quickly check for anomalies.
  7. TF Autograph aims to covert any normal Python code into a distributed program which is quite handy to scale an existing code base.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Pros
  • Data pipeline implementation is quite good, loading large amounts of data and pre-process it in an efficient way is no more issue for us
  • It supports all major DL algorithms and network layouts such as ConvNets, RNN, LSTMs, Word2Vec, and even the latest transformer architecture
  • The abstraction for the device is perfectly done and its support seamlessly for multiple GPU and even TPU will bring a lot of performance gain for enterprise scoped solution while still keep the flexibility
  • The TensorBoard is amazing. I haven't seen a similar thing in other frameworks on the market. It allows us to quickly understand and debug the model with the info visualization which makes understanding much better
  • A very supportive community, which is the key for sharing the ideas and find the quick and best solutions
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Cons
  • It would be much better if they could provide good documentation and easy ways to understand concepts.
  • It is difficult to understand the concept behind for example, Tensor Graph, which takes a lot of time.
  • As you have to write everything, it is time consuming to write the implementation of whole neural network. It would be better if they can provide some wrapper library to make things easier.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
Support of multiple components and ease of development.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Community support for TensorFlow is great. There's a huge community that truly loves the platform and there are many examples of development in TensorFlow. Often, when a new good technique is published, there will be a TensorFlow implementation not long after. This makes it quick to ally the latest techniques from academia straight to production-grade systems. Tooling around TensorFlow is also good. TensorBoard has been such a useful tool, I can't imagine how hard it would be to debug a deep neural network gone wrong without TensorBoard.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
Use of cloud for better execution power is recommended.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Can't seem to choose any deep learning platform in the above, so I'll list it here: 1. Apache MXNet: this has been used for one of our main algorithms for search as an end-to-end pipeline. We chose this because of the Scala bindings, which makes it easier to integrate with out JVM backend. MXNet seems comparable to TensorFlow, although community support is not as good as TensorFlow, and there are issues with memory leaks that are being worked on. TensorFlow in general is easier to use, but MXNet isn't too far behind. 2. Keras: still a favorite. Often I use this when paired with TensorFlow. TensorFlow 2.0 will make it even easier. 3. PyTorch: only used it a little, so it's hard to provide a good opinion. 4. DL4J: used it initially in an early days project because it has good JVM support. Harder to used not because of poor API design, but because community support is lacking and features don't come out as fast as TensorFlow.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • Positive Impact- As I mentioned before its open source. Very easy to learn for average programmer/ developer. We were able to design a POC model for understanding the patient appointment cancellation snd reasons behind it in 3 week time frame.
  • Negative Impact- If you are using tensor flow for small project it works fine. If you are trying to build a model for face recognition it will be hard to program and train the system. It needs data to be processed before hand cannot learn on the go.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
ScreenShots

Toric Screenshots

Screenshot of Toric - Embodied Energy Data App - This screenshot shows our embodied energy data app.  With this data app you can replace this data apps source information with your teams Revit project.  Your report can be shared and automatically updated anytime a change is saved in your Revit project.Screenshot of Toric - Data App Library - Toric has a robust library of data apps to easily get you started.  Leverage our data app to use with your own data, customize it to fit your needs, and save it into your companies data app library right in Toric for easy use with other projects.Screenshot of Toric - Integrations - Toric offers many integrations including Procore, Revit, Navisworks, BIM 360, Graphisoft Archicad, Quickbooks, Salesforce and Google Sheets.  We are also adding new integrations each month.  Learn more at https://www.toric.com/integrations