Tenable Security Center vs. Vulcan Cyber (discontinued)

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Tenable Security Center
Score 8.1 out of 10
N/A
Tenable Security Center (formerly Tenable.sc) from Tenable Network Security in Baltimore, presents a vulnerabiliy management option used to identify and prioritize vulnerabilities based on risk to businesses. It is managed on premises.N/A
Vulcan Cyber (discontinued)
Score 7.5 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
Vulcan Cyber was an exposure and vulnerability risk mitigation platform, acquired by Tenable in early 2025. The product is no longer available for sale, and functionality has been integrated into the Tenable One Exposure Management platform's vulnerability solution.N/A
Pricing
Tenable Security CenterVulcan Cyber (discontinued)
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Tenable Security CenterVulcan Cyber (discontinued)
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Tenable Security CenterVulcan Cyber (discontinued)
Features
Tenable Security CenterVulcan Cyber (discontinued)
Threat Intelligence
Comparison of Threat Intelligence features of Product A and Product B
Tenable Security Center
9.6
Ratings
19% above category average
Vulcan Cyber (discontinued)
7.9
Ratings
0% below category average
Network Analytics10.00 Ratings7.70 Ratings
Threat Recognition10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Vulnerability Classification9.00 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Automated Alerts and Reporting10.00 Ratings7.40 Ratings
Threat Analysis10.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Threat Intelligence Reporting10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Automated Threat Identification8.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Vulnerability Management Tools
Comparison of Vulnerability Management Tools features of Product A and Product B
Tenable Security Center
9.6
Ratings
17% above category average
Vulcan Cyber (discontinued)
7.4
Ratings
9% below category average
IT Asset Realization10.00 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Authentication8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Configuration Monitoring10.00 Ratings6.40 Ratings
Web Scanning10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Vulnerability Intelligence10.00 Ratings7.40 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Tenable Security CenterVulcan Cyber (discontinued)
Small Businesses
Action1
Action1
Score 9.5 out of 10
Action1
Action1
Score 9.5 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Action1
Action1
Score 9.5 out of 10
Action1
Action1
Score 9.5 out of 10
Enterprises
CrowdStrike Falcon
CrowdStrike Falcon
Score 9.1 out of 10
CrowdStrike Falcon
CrowdStrike Falcon
Score 9.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Tenable Security CenterVulcan Cyber (discontinued)
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(0 ratings)
7.2
(0 ratings)
Usability
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
9.4
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
7.1
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Tenable Security CenterVulcan Cyber (discontinued)
Likelihood to Recommend
Tenable.sc is best suited for those organizations who are not very comfortable with Cloud and want an on-premises solution. If any organization has to follow some guidelines that no data should go to the cloud, in this case, Tenable.sc is a perfect fit as it's installed in the infra Datacenter and no data goes to Cloud. Tenable.sc won't be appropriate for those who have their infra setup on cloud.
Read full review
We use Vulcan Cyber to help with the technical debt accrued over time with systems that were not maintained as well as they should be. To combat this, we use the campaign feature to keep a running tab on every system to ensure it is brought up to standards and maintained.
Read full review
Pros
  • Vulnerability management from one place
  • Maximum endpoint visibility
  • Easy to set up and plan the structure
  • Support desk quickly responses
  • Well-prepared documentation
  • Broad scanning type
  • Supports various compliance standards
  • User groups allows coordination between teams
Read full review
  • The user interface makes it very easy to use.
  • It provides a clear picture and helps us to make decisions.
  • It offers automation and risk visibility.
Read full review
Cons
  • Tenable could make it easier to report on missing reg key.
  • Tenable can also make it easier to report on os level patches vs application patches.
Read full review
  • Deduping of assets could be better.
  • The weighting of vulnerabilities is hard to describe to non technical executives.
  • The Business Groups and Tagging needs improvement. Or at least allow tags to be removed if not needed. Now they are static from the API feed.
Read full review
Usability
based on product capabilities and usage
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
On all of the occasions that I have had to reach out to Tenable for assistance, they have been extremely helpful and knowledgeable. Solutions and support are provided quickly, and they work on the issue until it is resolved.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Tenable.sc [(formerly SecurityCenter)] has been around for a long time and in our opinion offered the easiest configuration for compliance scanning and it's rating system was more impressive than Rapid 7's.
Read full review
Vulcan was easier to implement with our existing Security environment. The UX and UI were more intuitive and user-friendly. While SOAR is a super solid product, for our business Vulcan made more sense. It was more of a natural fit for a rapidly-expanding company in a hyper-growth phase using Edge technology.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Create internal/operational efficiencies
  • Improve compliance & risk management
  • Cost management
  • Solid vulnerability scanner
  • Ease, of use, and capabilities when it comes to analyzing vulnerabilities is what makes this product stand out
Read full review
  • Allows much better prioritizing of which assets are most vulnerable
  • Allow a better understanding of what assets are actually under real threat vs. what is assumed to be vulnerable, but the real world fact is the system would be hard to reach internally, so it's not as vulnerable.
Read full review
ScreenShots