Tenable Attack Surface Management vs. Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Tenable Attack Surface Management | Score6.1 out of 10 | N/A | Tenable Attack Surface Management (formerly Tenable.asm, and previously Bit Discovery) is an external attack surface management (EASM) solution that integrates into a vulnerability management platform. Tenable.asm continuously maps the entire internet and discovers connections to internet-facing assets so that users can assess the security posture of the entire external attack surface, or those facets of an organization that face the public, and the Internet. It can be used to access an attack… | N/A |
Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator | Score6.9 out of 10 | N/A | Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator (formerly McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator) software centralizes and streamlines management of endpoint, network, data security, and compliance solutions. | N/A |
| Tenable Attack Surface Management | Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Tenable Attack Surface Management | Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Would buy again 8 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Delivers good value for the price 6 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Happy with the feature set 8 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 5 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
No answers on this topic | 75% Implementation went as expected 6 Answers | |
| Tenable Attack Surface Management | Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Threat Intelligence |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vulnerability Management Tools |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Tenable Attack Surface Management | Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic |
| Medium-sized Companies | Tenable Nessus Score8.8 out of 10 | Tenable Nessus Score8.8 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | Tenable Vulnerability Management Score9.6 out of 10 | Tenable Vulnerability Management Score9.6 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Tenable Attack Surface Management | Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 10.0 | 7.0 |
| Support Rating | 10.0 | 8.2 |
| Tenable Attack Surface Management | Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Support Rating |
|
|
| Alternatives Considered |
|
|
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots |

