TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Tempered Airwall vs. Tufin Orchestration Suite

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Tempered Airwall

    Score10 out of 10
    N/ATempered Networks is network security technology from the company of the same name in Seattle, Washington.N/A

    Tufin Orchestration Suite

    Score8.9 out of 10
    N/AIsraeli company Tufin offers a firewall security management offering via the Tufin Orchestration Suite, including SecureApp for managing network connectivity, SecureChange network change automation, and SecureTrack multi-vendor and next-generation firewall management.N/A
    Pricing
    Tempered AirwallTufin Orchestration Suite
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Tempered AirwallTufin Orchestration Suite
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Features
    Tempered AirwallTufin Orchestration Suite
    Firewall Security Management
    Comparison of Firewall Security Management features of Tempered Airwall and Tufin Orchestration Suite
    Feature
    Tempered Airwall
    -
    Ratings
    Tufin Orchestration Suite
    8.2
    2 Ratings
    1% below category average
    Policy planning and rule management00 Ratings9.32 Ratings
    Automated Policy Orchestration00 Ratings7.92 Ratings
    Device Discovery00 Ratings6.92 Ratings
    Policy Compliance Auditing00 Ratings8.62 Ratings
    Attack Path Simulation Testing00 Ratings5.62 Ratings
    Anomalous Event or Behavior Deviation00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
    Vulnerability Scans00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
    Firewall Rule Cleanup00 Ratings9.32 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    Tempered AirwallTufin Orchestration Suite
    Small Businesses
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Medium-sized Companies
    Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE)
    Score8.7 out of 10
    Palo Alto Panorama
    Score8.9 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE)
    Score8.7 out of 10
    Palo Alto Panorama
    Score8.9 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Tempered AirwallTufin Orchestration Suite
    Likelihood to Recommend
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    7.3
    (4 ratings)
    Support Rating
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Tempered AirwallTufin Orchestration Suite
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Tempered
    It's very well suited for geographically dispersed organizations, where deploying and managing remote firewalls and other network security functions aren't practical. Once deployed, and the deployment isn't difficult after planning and understanding the data flows of the IoT devices, the system is easily managed and flexible. You're able to allow front line operations people to add devices into a role without sacrificing the integrity of the security model.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Tufin
    Well suited scenarios - 1) Firewall Policy / Ruleset management 2) Where all the products are from Tufin like TOS ST, SC, SecureApp etc 3) Where customer focuses on ruleset compliance - USP violations, and other features Less suited - 1) Agnostic/distributed environment - Tough with integrate with 3rd party like CyberArk 2) FW recertification processes / exception process when complex process is included
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Tempered
    • Low capital and support cost structures.
    • Ease of deployment.
    • Ability to work over the existing network.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Tufin
    • Firewall management
    • Compliance reports
    • Unused rules and optimization
    • Policy Automation
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Tempered
    • Integration with third-party security controls.
    • Automating the on-boarding of devices.
    • Reporting needs to be more detailed.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Tufin
    • Palo Alto Networks Integration
    • Better/more user friendly api for integration with ticketing systems
    • Web UI structure is not user-friendly
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Tempered
    It's pretty darned good for a new company. We had to hash through a couple of instances that no one had ever run into, but once we got to the right person on the engineering team, they were able to work through the solution pretty quickly. The nice thing is, unlike Cisco, once you fix something, you don't find three new things that have to be changed.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Tufin
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    Tempered
    The cost and complexity vs. ISE is as different as Uber and Lift are from trying to take a taxi in Duluth, Minnesota. The complexity of Cisco's IoT security is a joke. It was going to take us over a year just to deploy all the Cisco equipment, and that was if we could have gotten it all working together. We got the entire project deployed in just under 3 months, and that includes working out all the bugs and logistics. Honestly, I don't think all the Cisco parts would have ever been running like Cisco promised it would. It's just way too complicated.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Tufin
    1) Fairly okay overall but definitely needs improvement overall Vs the other products available in the market like Palo Alto XSOAR 2) Cost wise okay at the beginning but when client demands add-ons/ more features/customization tailored to their needs, Tufin Orchestration Suite recommends RFE / custom costs/development costs 3) USP feature is cool to use overall Vs FireMon 4) Tufin ProServ needs to buckle-up/Support compared to other competitors in the market
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Tempered
    • Capital cost to deploy was 1/4 the cost of doing Cisco.
    • People and time frame to do the entire deployment was 1/12th the time/people to complete the installation.
    • On-going management is being done without adding staff.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Tufin
    • I think if you correctly configure your SIEM, you don't need Tufin. You can correlate a lot of things for firewalls.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots