Team Procure vs. Zip Intake-to-Procure

Zip Intake-to-Procure

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
Team Procure	Score 0.0 out of 10	Small Businesses (1-50 employees)	Team Procure is a cloud-based procurement software designed to help businesses manage purchase requests, purchase orders, RFQs, and inventory/warehouse operations. It enables users to compare suppliers on an item and price basis, review monthly progress across procurement activities, and keep track of critical stock levels in warehouses. Using Team Procure, administrators can generate reports to gain insights into purchased items based on department, project, and…	$250 per month includes 3 users (50$ for additional user)
Zip Intake-to-Procure	Score 7.9 out of 10	Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)	Zip provides a place for employees to initiate a purchase or vendor request. Each request is routed for approval across procurement, finance, IT, data security, legal, and other teams, and Zip integrates into ERP and P2P solutions to create a PR or draft PO. The vendor states Zip works with Canva, Checkr, Hopin, Zapier, CM Group, and other companies both public and private.	N/A

Pricing

Team Procure

Zip Intake-to-Procure

Editions & Modules

Cloud Suite: $250
per month includes 3 users (50$ for additional user)
Enteprise Procurement: custom
per month

No answers on this topic

Offerings

Pricing Offerings
Team Procure	Zip Intake-to-Procure
Free Trial
Yes	No
Free/Freemium Version
No	No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No	No

Entry-level Setup Fee

No setup fee

Additional Details

The enterprise solution is for companies that need a custom-built procurement system for large-scale operations. It includes dedicated servers, ERP integrations, a supplier portal, advanced sourcing features, premium support, and a branded app.

—

More Pricing Information

Community Pulse
	Team Procure	Zip Intake-to-Procure

Best Alternatives
	Team Procure	Zip Intake-to-Procure
Small Businesses	MIP Fund Accounting Score 8.7 out of 10	MIP Fund Accounting Score 8.7 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies	Precoro Score 2.8 out of 10	Precoro Score 2.8 out of 10
Enterprises	SAP S/4HANA Cloud Score 8.6 out of 10	SAP S/4HANA Cloud Score 8.6 out of 10
All Alternatives	View all alternatives	View all alternatives

User Ratings
	Team Procure	Zip Intake-to-Procure
Likelihood to Recommend	- (0 ratings)	7.7 (0 ratings)
Support Rating	- (0 ratings)	9.1 (0 ratings)

User Testimonials
	Team Procure	Zip Intake-to-Procure
Likelihood to Recommend	No answers on this topic	Zip is a newer product in the P2P space, and as such there are still some areas for improvement. They don't have all the "bells and whistles" products and configurations that some of the other players in this space have, but the products they do offer are best in class. Zip is an ideal tool for tactical procurement. Incentivized Nick Huffman Category Manager Read full review
Pros	No answers on this topic	No coding - Ability for the administrator to make changes without development resources helps us be agile as a procurement org. Visibility to the user in a great user interface Accountability (helps us track SLAs on response time), Audit trails keeping track of everything The implementation team was incredible, as is ongoing support. They want you to succeed in your goals vs. just implement their tool Chanie Wiesenberg Director of Finance at Gong.io Read full review
Cons	No answers on this topic	Missing the ability to proxy as another user. Currently, if one approver did not set up their delegation, an admin or the approver of that step must reassign each of the approvals to another person. Bulk upload options for admins to update queues and subqueues. Missing ability to schedule reports or the option to share a saved view with another user. It would be easier if certain filtered views can be shared with others to avoid each user having to create their own views. Incentivized EZ emily zhang Sr Manager, Procurement Operations Read full review
Support Rating	No answers on this topic	Incredibly responsive and helpful. Incentivized SH Shana Hawkins Procurement Specialist Read full review
Alternatives Considered	No answers on this topic	Truth be told, we haven’t seen any other similar products. The alternative was manually tracking in Google Sheets, ticketing systems, and in NetSuite. Coupa was probably the closest in terms of what we were looking for but they were not willing to fit it to our needs like Zip was able to. Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Return on Investment	No answers on this topic	Zip Intake-to-Procure has helped clean up forecasting for us - we've improved accuracy by over 30% since now we're forcing folks to make sure spend is captured accurately and checking submitted PO amounts against the bottoms up forecast We've also been able to leverage the SLA insights provided by Zip Intake-to-Procure to increase operational efficiencies. We're identified orgs that are slowing down the overall approval process and putting more pressure with shorter SLA times. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
ScreenShots	Team Procure Screenshots	Zip Intake-to-Procure Screenshots