Google Meet vs. Zimbra by Synacor

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Google Meet
Score 8.1 out of 10
N/A
Google Meet, formerly Hangouts Meet, replaces the former Google Hangouts as the company's G Suite integrated web conferencing tool, allowing users to join meetings directly from a Calendar event or email invite from a computer, phone, or conference room. G Suite's Enterprise edition also creates a dial-in phone number for each meeting, as an additional convenience.
$6
per month
Zimbra
Score 6.7 out of 10
N/A
Zimbra is an email and collaboration platform and productivity suite that includes contacts, calendar, tasks, chat and file sharing, plus videoconferencing, document editing, and file storage.N/A
Pricing
Google MeetZimbra by Synacor
Editions & Modules
Google Workspace - Business Starter
$6
per month
Google Workspace - Business Standard
$12
per month
Google Workspace - Business Plus
$18
per month
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Google MeetZimbra
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Google MeetZimbra by Synacor
Features
Google MeetZimbra by Synacor
Performance & Compatibility of Online Events Software
Comparison of Performance & Compatibility of Online Events Software features of Product A and Product B
Google Meet
8.6
Ratings
8% above category average
Zimbra by Synacor
-
Ratings
High quality audio8.60 Ratings00 Ratings
High quality video8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Low bandwidth requirements8.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile support8.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Screen Sharing
Comparison of Screen Sharing features of Product A and Product B
Google Meet
7.8
Ratings
2% below category average
Zimbra by Synacor
-
Ratings
Desktop sharing7.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Whiteboards8.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Online Meetings / Events
Comparison of Online Meetings / Events features of Product A and Product B
Google Meet
7.5
Ratings
10% below category average
Zimbra by Synacor
-
Ratings
Calendar integration8.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Meeting initiation8.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Integrates with social media6.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Record meetings / events6.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Slideshows7.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Online Events Collaboration
Comparison of Online Events Collaboration features of Product A and Product B
Google Meet
7.5
Ratings
9% below category average
Zimbra by Synacor
-
Ratings
Live chat8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Audience polling7.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Q&A6.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Online Events Security
Comparison of Online Events Security features of Product A and Product B
Google Meet
8.5
Ratings
5% above category average
Zimbra by Synacor
-
Ratings
User authentication8.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Participant roles & permissions9.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Confidential attendee list7.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Product A and Product B
Google Meet
-
Ratings
Zimbra by Synacor
9.0
Ratings
15% above category average
Task Management00 Ratings9.80 Ratings
Gantt Charts00 Ratings8.10 Ratings
Scheduling00 Ratings9.80 Ratings
Workflow Automation00 Ratings7.20 Ratings
Mobile Access00 Ratings9.70 Ratings
Search00 Ratings9.80 Ratings
Visual planning tools00 Ratings8.50 Ratings
Communication
Comparison of Communication features of Product A and Product B
Google Meet
-
Ratings
Zimbra by Synacor
6.6
Ratings
18% below category average
Chat00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Notifications00 Ratings5.20 Ratings
Discussions00 Ratings2.00 Ratings
Surveys00 Ratings7.70 Ratings
Internal knowledgebase00 Ratings7.70 Ratings
Integrates with GoToMeeting00 Ratings7.60 Ratings
Integrates with Gmail and Google Hangouts00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Integrates with Outlook00 Ratings7.50 Ratings
File Sharing & Management
Comparison of File Sharing & Management features of Product A and Product B
Google Meet
-
Ratings
Zimbra by Synacor
5.6
Ratings
33% below category average
Versioning00 Ratings5.10 Ratings
Video files00 Ratings1.40 Ratings
Audio files00 Ratings1.40 Ratings
Document collaboration00 Ratings5.10 Ratings
Access control00 Ratings8.70 Ratings
Advanced security features00 Ratings9.70 Ratings
Integrates with Google Drive00 Ratings6.60 Ratings
Device sync00 Ratings6.60 Ratings
User Ratings
Google MeetZimbra by Synacor
Likelihood to Recommend
8.6
(0 ratings)
7.9
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
7.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.2
(0 ratings)
7.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
9.8
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Google MeetZimbra by Synacor
Likelihood to Recommend
Google Meet was a perfect video conferencing solution for us during our training sessions. The only problems encountered were due to weak signals, which sometimes required us to turn off our video. All features worked very well in tying together a team across four different time zones. I was very impressed with the tool's performance
Read full review
I consider Zimbra Email & Collaboration a viable alternative to the major American cloud email platforms. In a scenario where data protection and privacy are critical, especially in an on-premise environment, Zimbra is a very suitable solution. It is also capable of offering a comprehensive set of tools and additional features (tasks, calendars, contacts, briefcase) in an integrated manner.
Read full review
Pros
  • First off, the quality of the call is pretty good, especially when all of us are working remotely.
  • We can easily schedule our meeting in Google Calendar.
  • Sending an invitation link is easy.
  • What makes Google Meet stand out from other video conferencing tools is that we can use it for an unlimited time, even if we use the free account.
Read full review
  • The management of incremental mail backup. It is very simple, and the administrators of my company recover information quickly.
  • The management of the distribution lists is structured. This allows easy distribution of mass information.
  • The web application is very complete and intuitive.
Read full review
Cons
  • Meet as it comes doesn't have a great way to handle large meetings.
  • I don't like the way they hide the mute button. It's a disruptive view to mute/unmute.
  • Chat box is the only way to document collaborations within the meeting.
Read full review
  • User web interface could be more friendly, but it is enough for daily use. It could be renewed and has to consider some usability concerns. Improving usability would significantly improve users' satisfaction.
  • Message backup recovery is not a simple activity.
  • As an administrator, some of the features work better using the command-line interface.
  • The webclient uses ajax requests in almost every event. Because of that you may need a fast internet connection to have a good experience. You can switch to HTML version but it will limit what you can do.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Google Hangouts Meet is easy to use and easy to access. I've experienced very few technical issues compared to other similar software options. It's a little less formal than Microsoft Teams but makes it easy to access other google items such as google drive and google docs. Meeting in hangout gives you an easy-to-use hub to not only meet for planning or team-building purposes but to easily share information that can help you with your meeting goals.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
Google Meet is very easy and simple to use. I can schedule a meeting right on my calendar - it literally takes a few seconds. There is no additional app I have to open to schedule anything. Guests can click on the link easily to join any meetings. 10/10!
Read full review
The web usability of the solution is adequate, with all functions integrated into a single interface. However, it is important to note that in the desktop environment, it lacks its own application and relies on ActiveSync synchronization with reference solutions like Outlook or Thunderbird. Some features, such as the briefcase, will be excluded. The same happens on smartphones.It is also common for competing solutions to include integrated chat or video call tools, which Zimbra lacks. These shortcomings are among the most frequently requested by users.
Read full review
Support Rating
Google does a great job of providing tech support for this product, as it does many others. Similarly, Google has FAQs that cover a large amount of issues faced by users. Problems have not persisted in our use of this product. Problems are resolved quickly and easily, with or without personal Google support.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
No answers on this topic
Overall, we were satisfied with the implementation. We perhaps should have spent more time consulting with Zimbra or others regarding best practices but as we got to know the system better we were able to make changes relatively easily after the fact.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
The main positive feature in Google Meet over Zoom to me is the fact that Google meet can be seamlessly deployed in the browser with its full functionality. Unlike Zoom for which you need to download an extra application to use. This consequently makes workflow smooth when transitioning between something like emails and taking part in a meeting.
Read full review
  • We were originally a Groupwise shop before changing to Zimbra in 2008. Zimbra, from an end-user standpoint, pricing, system administration, and management is a far better system.
  • We use Google Apps for our students. We did not find it to be suitable for faculty and staff due to its lack of shared accounts.
  • We are moving from Zimbra to Office 365. Office 365 offers just about all that Zimbra had, though its web interface is inferior to that of Zimbra. It does offer us greatly reduced costs though, and high availability. If Zimbra were to have a fully HA environment, we may have stayed with them.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Negative: on each webinar someone from our team had to write manually the people that were participating and after that matching it with the registered people list. We wasted time. It could be easily resolved by adding the export list feature
  • Positive: Collaboration and internal meetings. Calendar integration helps us save time.
Read full review
  • Improved internal communication and dissemination and distribution of messages and corporate objectives.
  • The creation of an internal network of employees is something that gives us security and confidence.
  • Having a private and exclusive messaging system differentiates us from the competition and from other companies.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Zimbra Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of