TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Symantec Endpoint Security vs. Trellix Endpoint Security ENS

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Symantec Endpoint Security

    Score6.2 out of 10
    N/ASymantec Endpoint Protection is the company's flagship antivirus / endpoint security product.

    $29.99

    per year 100-249 devices

    Trellix Endpoint Security ENS

    Score8 out of 10
    N/ATrellix Endpoint Security (ENS) solutions apply proactive threat intelligence and defenses across the entire attack lifecycle to keep organizations safer and more resilient.N/A
    Pricing
    Symantec Endpoint SecurityTrellix Endpoint Security ENS
    Editions & Modules
    Endpoint Security, Initial Hybrid Subscription License With Support
    $29.99
    1 year 100-249 devices
    Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise, Initial Hybrid Subscription License with Support
    $34.99
    1 year 1-99 devices
    Endpoint Security, Initial Hybrid Subscription License With Support
    $90.99
    3 years 100-249 devices
    Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise, Initial Hybrid Subscription License with Support
    $99.99
    3 years 1-99 devices
    Symantec Endpoint Security Complete, Initial Hybrid Subscription License with Support
    $200
    3 years 1-99 devices
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Symantec Endpoint SecurityTrellix Endpoint Security ENS
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Symantec Endpoint SecurityTrellix Endpoint Security ENS
    Considered Both Products
    Broadcom
    No answer on this topic
    Trellix (FireEye + McAfee)
    Chose Trellix Endpoint Security ENS
    All in one protection for endpoint devices, the data loss prevention, and adaptive threat protection is the best advantage against other competitors. The cost for the platform and service is very effective and efficient. The usage and capability of this software is very edge …
    Incentivized
    Chose Trellix Endpoint Security ENS
    Unlike Trellix Endpoint Security Symantec Endpoint provides less information about events on the user side. Trellix give an opportunity to see information about virus detection on a user machine as quick as it possible, so we were able to catch the signs of virus propagation …
    Incentivized
    Chose Trellix Endpoint Security ENS
    Trellix Endpoint Security ENS interfaces better with other tools and is simpler to use. provides wider endpoint protection and more centralized control than SentinelOne's automatic response. Trellix Endpoint Security ENS preserves McAfee's dependability while offering newer …
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    83%
    Would buy again
    20 Answers
    77%
    Would buy again
    10 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    91%
    Delivers good value for the price
    20 Answers
    92%
    Delivers good value for the price
    11 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    92%
    Happy with the feature set
    22 Answers
    77%
    Happy with the feature set
    10 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    90%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    18 Answers
    100%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    10 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    96%
    Implementation went as expected
    23 Answers
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    12 Answers
    Features
    Symantec Endpoint SecurityTrellix Endpoint Security ENS
    Endpoint Security
    Comparison of Endpoint Security features of Symantec Endpoint Security and Trellix Endpoint Security ENS
    Feature
    Symantec Endpoint Security
    9.2
    36 Ratings
    7% above category average
    Trellix Endpoint Security ENS
    8.8
    14 Ratings
    3% above category average
    Anti-Exploit Technology8.930 Ratings9.312 Ratings
    Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)9.933 Ratings8.813 Ratings
    Centralized Management8.934 Ratings9.414 Ratings
    Hybrid Deployment Support8.825 Ratings7.98 Ratings
    Infection Remediation7.934 Ratings8.913 Ratings
    Vulnerability Management9.831 Ratings8.211 Ratings
    Malware Detection9.934 Ratings9.414 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    Symantec Endpoint SecurityTrellix Endpoint Security ENS
    Small Businesses
    Acronis Cyber Protect Cloud
    Score9.1 out of 10
    Acronis Cyber Protect Cloud
    Score9.1 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    Watchguard Endpoint Security
    Score8.8 out of 10
    Watchguard Endpoint Security
    Score8.8 out of 10
    Enterprises
    ESET PROTECT
    Score9.1 out of 10
    ESET PROTECT
    Score9.1 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Symantec Endpoint SecurityTrellix Endpoint Security ENS
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.7
    (63 ratings)
    9.3
    (25 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    9.1
    (4 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Usability
    9.1
    (4 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Availability
    9.0
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Support Rating
    1.0
    (11 ratings)
    5.0
    (6 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    6.4
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Ease of integration
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Symantec Endpoint SecurityTrellix Endpoint Security ENS
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Broadcom
    Symantec Endpoint Security is a well-rounded product that provides a significant amount of functionality and covers many of our endpoint needs without needing to resort to multiple vendors that might clash in unpredictable ways when ultimately deployed to the endpoints in our estate. The default policies are adequate and tuning these requires some time as with all similar EDR products but the product is flexible enough to allow very granular whitelisting/blacklisting which is great. Low resource requirements are also fantastic and we've not had many complaints from developers who were getting slowed down when compiling complex code with other previous solutions.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Trellix (FireEye + McAfee)
    It provides great web security and will protect your devices against viruses and malware when paired with other security software and hardware. For instance, we have multiple layers of security set up so if McAfee misses something then one of our other barriers will catch the infection or intrusion before it reaches the network. I would not suggest using this product as a standalone agent because I do not think it will be as effective when working by itself. The dashboard also makes it convenient to manage devices, policies, and settings from wherever you are so it's an ideal solution for any IT department to use. I would just suggest using something else as a backup so your network isn't left vulnerable.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Broadcom
    • The virus and spyware protection has worked well for us, catching several things and quarantining the items or cleaning them.
    • The virus definitions very rarely fail to update for the users, so I feel confident that my client machines are kept up to date.
    • I like the report I get daily telling me about threats found and action taken without having to login to the console to look it up myself.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Trellix (FireEye + McAfee)
    • Provides high fidelity alerting.
    • Allows CSOC analysts to perform forensic triage and alert investigations through containment from a single pane of glass.
    • Provides alert telemetry across on-disk and in-memory attacks.
    • Supports many additional 'bolt-on' modules to provide additional alert context or capabilities.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Broadcom
    • The system should have a better ability to auto repair, if an item is malfunctioning it should auto reinstall.
    • The cloud platform and the server do not talk well to each other and it would be great to get the same data on both platforms, this may be due to version though.
    • It seems the whitelisting on the cloud platform could use some work.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Trellix (FireEye + McAfee)
    • The amount of false detections especially the negative ones needed to be reduced.
    • It requires more optimization. It tends to make the PCs slower.
    • It almost doesn't have the ability to heal. This is very important as we need our sensitive data to be recoverable.
    • It doesn't have any free scanning functionality. Our users using personal machines cannot scan in case of an incident. This could be added like Malwarebytes.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Broadcom
    Best of Breed. Symantec Endpoint Protection beats all other end point products I have used, tested and seen in presentation at this point in time.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Trellix (FireEye + McAfee)
    No answers on this topic
    Usability
    Broadcom
    The rating reflects Symantec Endpoint Security's ability to balance enterprise grade security with user-friendly workflows or advanced configurations require extra effort. For most organizations, the streamlined management and robust automation justify the high score. Management GUI is old fashined and need to be improve. Older devices may experience slowdowns during full scans without careful configuration.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Trellix (FireEye + McAfee)
    So below is my breakdown, Pro's: Centralized Management, Comprehensive Protection and customization. Con's: Initial cost
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Reliability and Availability
    Broadcom
    We've used it for years and the software is easy to use. The dashboard is easy to read, and you can easily figure out where to go to troubleshoot or deploy software. Symantec is there for emergencies like backup restoration or file retrieval. It's pretty low maintenance. Symantec is there when your IT infrastructure needs it
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Trellix (FireEye + McAfee)
    No answers on this topic
    Support Rating
    Broadcom
    Support is completely awful! You can never get anyone to help if you can even find a number to call. The support web portal is a joke and their response time if you're even able to submit a ticket is ridiculously slow.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Trellix (FireEye + McAfee)
    The support of product was very good when we initially implemented the solution. We were getting fats replies and could see the customer approach. After a while the level of support was not following the SLA's and the replies were getting very confusing and late.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Implementation Rating
    Broadcom
    Use a third party deployment tool and not the deployment option within the SEP Manager itself.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Trellix (FireEye + McAfee)
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    Broadcom
    Symantec Endpoint Security offers very similar features to the above products, they all do the same thing in terms of protecting your endpoints against cybersecurity threats. Installation wise the products all install from a central management system and report back to this for central reporting. Ultimately we choose Symantec as the reseller was able to offer additional incentives which made their pricing very competitive.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Trellix (FireEye + McAfee)
    Unlike Trellix Endpoint Security Symantec Endpoint provides less information about events on the user side. Trellix give an opportunity to see information about virus detection on a user machine as quick as it possible, so we were able to catch the signs of virus propagation early and prevent the spread of damage
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Broadcom
    • The ROI from deploying this has led to fewer security issues which reduces costs.
    • Keeping track of security issues and how the were remedied is easier.
    • Deskside support can work with end users easily if something is triggered and this allows us to not have to overstaff.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Trellix (FireEye + McAfee)
    • From an auditing standpoint, we can show that our workstations/servers are protected.
    • Even though it cant identify more advanced/targeted malware, it is still good to identify the more obvious malware which occurs daily in my enterprise.
    • Since it can be easily deployed, the products can easily get deployed on all systems in the environment for optimal anti-malware protection.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    Trellix Endpoint Security ENS Screenshots

    Screenshot of The Monitoring workspace presents actionable endpoint threat detection without the noise.Screenshot of Automatically identify the key findings without requiring manual evaluation of each individual artifact.Screenshot of Visualization displays relationships and speeds analyst understanding.Screenshot of AI-guided investigations automatically provide answers to typical questions asked during a security incident and highlight the most relevant evidence.