Symantec Email Security.cloud vs. Webroot Email Security Powered by Zix

If you don't want to have any spam or malware in your mailbox, Symantec Email Security.cloud is the solution to choose. Also, if you need to have some security features, like DLP, it has them embedded!

We have also been using reporting a lot to see how many emails have been sent, where they delivered, and so on.

Incentivized

I have already recommended Zix to a number of our coworkers in the home healthcare industry, and a number of those coworkers also use Zix, which makes it quite simple to connect with one another. Because it pertains to health care, which is an industry in which it is vital to maintain confidentiality and sensitivity, we also utilize it within our own organization to communicate with one another.

Incentivized

• Filters spam and malware on the highest possible level
• Provides stable service

Incentivized

• Makes it easy for those receiving emails to create an account and retrieve the email.
• Peace of mind knowing emails are secure, and can be tracked.
• Monitoring inbound email threats is easy.
• Support has been very quick resolving or explaining support tickets I've created.

Incentivized

• Searching within the console can be slow at times, especially when making small tweaks and refreshing quickly
• Features seem to have slowed down since Symantec acquired this formerly "MessageLabs" product
• Advanced filtering and scanning is not quite as good as several competitors

Incentivized

• Ease of use. Other competitors platform is WAY easier to use and customize.
• You have to cover THE ENTIRE ORGANIZATION with coverage, even though only a handful will need to use email encryption
• The Zix Protect platform is a complete joke to customize and use.

Incentivized

It did delivers exactly what is needed, what was promised, is cost effective, and is incredibly easy to use and manage.

Incentivized

It is much simpler to configure and operate in comparison to other anti-spam applications. Zix's customer usage is comparable to that of other spam filters on the market; but, in terms of convenience of use, Zix comes out on top. Daily delivery of logs is provided, and the user is not required to sign in order for an email to be sent.

Incentivized

In very tricky cases, it takes time to explain it to the support personnel as they don't get your problem from the first couple of emails.

Incentivized

Zix is very good about response times and information. They even proactively e-mail us about known issues. I have never had an issue go unresolved, and the support team tends to answer quickly unless it's a strange, complicated request. The only time that happened was doing a search through logs, and that was entirely on me and my unfamiliarity with their flavor of Linux.

Incentivized

Barracuda's ESS is the premier product, it boasts outbound email encryption as an included service as well as all of the security features of Symantec Email Security.cloud. Sophos is on the same level as SES.c but is not quite as feature rich.

Incentivized

Proofpoint is a major player in this space, and I believe their product is overall superior to Webroot Email Security. However, the price is much higher for products like Proofpoint, which has made it difficult to fit that into our budget. We really like using the outbound email encryption feature of Zix, and I think that has some serious competitive advantages over something like Proofpoint, and so it is nice to have that all in one platform.

Incentivized

• Our previous solution was very manual. The ROI has been in less manual intervention from the admins and freeing up their already busy schedules.

Incentivized

• Users have improved at identifying spam.
• Fewer false positives are coming through.
• It has identified a lot of security holes from vendors (e.g. most vendors using outdated extensions that we are now able to block, creating a discussion with our users).

Incentivized