Sugar Sell from SugarCRM is a collaborative CRM, allowing users to track and monitor activities, map each customer’s journey. Sugar Sell replaces former editions of the SugarCRM product, including the SugarCRM Community Edition, the open source edition, which is discontinued.
$19
per month (billed annually) per user (3 user minimum, 9 user maximum)
Unanet CRM by Cosential
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
Unanet CRM by Cosential (formerly Cosential CRM) is dedicated to helping AEC business developers, marketers, and executives win better business, and grow revenue. It became an Unanet solution in 2020, when Unanet acquired Cosential.
N/A
Pricing
Sugar Sell (SugarCRM)
Unanet CRM by Cosential
Editions & Modules
Essentials
$19
per month (billed annually) per user (3 user minimum, 9 user maximum)
Standard
$59
per month (billed annually) per user (10 User Minimum)
Advanced
$85
per month (billed annually) per user (10 user minimum)
Premier
$135
per month (billed annually) per user (10 user minimum)
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Sugar Sell (SugarCRM)
Unanet CRM by Cosential
Free Trial
Yes
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Sugar Sell (SugarCRM)
Unanet CRM by Cosential
Features
Sugar Sell (SugarCRM)
Unanet CRM by Cosential
Sales Force Automation
Comparison of Sales Force Automation features of Product A and Product B
Sugar Sell (SugarCRM)
4.8
Ratings
46% below category average
Unanet CRM by Cosential
8.7
Ratings
12% above category average
Customer data management / contact management
5.00 Ratings
10.00 Ratings
Workflow management
6.00 Ratings
6.00 Ratings
Territory management
6.00 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Opportunity management
7.00 Ratings
10.00 Ratings
Integration with email client (e.g., Outlook or Gmail)
7.00 Ratings
10.00 Ratings
Contract management
3.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Quote & order management
4.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Interaction tracking
3.00 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Channel / partner relationship management
2.00 Ratings
7.00 Ratings
Customer Service & Support
Comparison of Customer Service & Support features of Product A and Product B
Sugar Sell (SugarCRM)
2.3
Ratings
106% below category average
Unanet CRM by Cosential
-
Ratings
Case management
3.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Call center management
2.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Help desk management
2.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Marketing Automation
Comparison of Marketing Automation features of Product A and Product B
Sugar Sell (SugarCRM)
5.5
Ratings
32% below category average
Unanet CRM by Cosential
7.5
Ratings
1% below category average
Lead management
6.00 Ratings
10.00 Ratings
Email marketing
5.00 Ratings
5.00 Ratings
CRM Project Management
Comparison of CRM Project Management features of Product A and Product B
Sugar Sell (SugarCRM)
3.0
Ratings
87% below category average
Unanet CRM by Cosential
8.0
Ratings
5% above category average
Task management
4.00 Ratings
7.00 Ratings
Billing and invoicing management
3.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Reporting
2.00 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
CRM Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of CRM Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Sugar Sell (SugarCRM)
3.3
Ratings
79% below category average
Unanet CRM by Cosential
8.7
Ratings
14% above category average
Forecasting
3.00 Ratings
6.00 Ratings
Pipeline visualization
2.00 Ratings
10.00 Ratings
Customizable reports
5.00 Ratings
10.00 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Product A and Product B
Sugar Sell (SugarCRM)
5.5
Ratings
31% below category average
Unanet CRM by Cosential
7.5
Ratings
0% above category average
Custom fields
6.00 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Custom objects
5.00 Ratings
6.00 Ratings
Scripting environment
6.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
API for custom integration
5.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
Sugar Sell (SugarCRM)
5.5
Ratings
41% below category average
Unanet CRM by Cosential
10.0
Ratings
18% above category average
Single sign-on capability
5.00 Ratings
10.00 Ratings
Role-based user permissions
6.00 Ratings
10.00 Ratings
Social CRM
Comparison of Social CRM features of Product A and Product B
Sugar Sell (SugarCRM)
3.0
Ratings
84% below category average
Unanet CRM by Cosential
5.0
Ratings
38% below category average
Social data
3.00 Ratings
5.00 Ratings
Social engagement
3.00 Ratings
5.00 Ratings
Integrations with 3rd-party Software
Comparison of Integrations with 3rd-party Software features of Product A and Product B
Sugar Sell (SugarCRM)
4.5
Ratings
48% below category average
Unanet CRM by Cosential
5.0
Ratings
38% below category average
Marketing automation
5.00 Ratings
5.00 Ratings
Compensation management
4.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Platform
Comparison of Platform features of Product A and Product B
The way Community Tax uses Sugar from a users point of view is, it can house a lot of information for either a company or individual with the option of adding additional sub cases . The down side is there are licenses issued per user and 1 per user is not enough because most of the time we are multitasking. Therefore a program/software would be more suitable instead of using a URL.
Our organization will continue to use Sugar as long as it remains cost effective and it addresses the majority of our needs. I will, however, recommend looking into other options once our needs increase and there is additional budget for some bigger named and more robust platform options. I feel if the application was friendlier to end users we would get better productivity as well.
In the overall usage of the system I still give it a 10 out 10 because it's our day to day system that we use here at work. We all have come to love it because it's quick and easy to use. New updates are given to us by our supervisors or managers and it's easy to do new things in the system. The only Issue like I said before that I'm having is that once I put a payment date and want to modify the dates, it will only allow me to eliminate the date but not put a new one back in.
Cosential is very intuitive for the AEC industry and has the ability to be customized for your specific needs. The reports are especially helpful, with good visual dashboards.
Because it provides us with the necessary support and with the updates that are being made in the system, it allows us to improve our work experience and makes it easier for the entire team. When requesting some type of support it is effective and immediate and with this, it [does not] stagnate our productivity.
My original trainer / implementation specialist was fantastic. That relationship has continued, even though I have been officially handed off to the customer service side. The customer service side seems to have higher turnover than normal, but in general they are also very supportive, although not as responsive as I might like.
We feel clasroom training is essential to ensure user adoption and buy-in. Video and on-line training courses gave their place but being in a classroom setting enables the Team to make any potential CRM issues visble right up front.
Study, study, and study. Be prepared to train everyday until all processes are flowing nicely. The CRM is the elephant and figuring out where to take the first bite can be a challenge. But there is only one way to eat this elephant, one bite at a time. Systematic planning is very important.
SugarCRM does not stack up well against Bloomreach; we moved away from SugarCRM to Bloomreach, which was much more suited and easily integrated into many different platforms. Bloomreach has a much nicer user interface for debugging and simpler screens for less technical audiences to utilize 3rd. Party support is rarely required, and lots of easy-to-understand documentation is available.
I know that SugarCRM has made a positive impact on my day to day work. Since we have made the change to SugarCRM (over a year ago) it has made life easier, more productive, and efficient.
Organization is key and this CRM has done this exceptionally for me.