Sugar Sell (SugarCRM) vs. Unanet CRM by Cosential

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Sugar Sell (SugarCRM)
Score 5.3 out of 10
N/A
Sugar Sell from SugarCRM is a collaborative CRM, allowing users to track and monitor activities, map each customer’s journey. Sugar Sell replaces former editions of the SugarCRM product, including the SugarCRM Community Edition, the open source edition, which is discontinued.
$19
per month (billed annually) per user (3 user minimum, 9 user maximum)
Unanet CRM by Cosential
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
Unanet CRM by Cosential (formerly Cosential CRM) is dedicated to helping AEC business developers, marketers, and executives win better business, and grow revenue. It became an Unanet solution in 2020, when Unanet acquired Cosential.N/A
Pricing
Sugar Sell (SugarCRM)Unanet CRM by Cosential
Editions & Modules
Essentials
$19
per month (billed annually) per user (3 user minimum, 9 user maximum)
Standard
$59
per month (billed annually) per user (10 User Minimum)
Advanced
$85
per month (billed annually) per user (10 user minimum)
Premier
$135
per month (billed annually) per user (10 user minimum)
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Sugar Sell (SugarCRM)Unanet CRM by Cosential
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Sugar Sell (SugarCRM)Unanet CRM by Cosential
Features
Sugar Sell (SugarCRM)Unanet CRM by Cosential
Sales Force Automation
Comparison of Sales Force Automation features of Product A and Product B
Sugar Sell (SugarCRM)
4.8
Ratings
46% below category average
Unanet CRM by Cosential
8.7
Ratings
12% above category average
Customer data management / contact management5.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Workflow management6.00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Territory management6.00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Opportunity management7.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Integration with email client (e.g., Outlook or Gmail)7.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Contract management3.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Quote & order management4.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Interaction tracking3.00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Channel / partner relationship management2.00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Customer Service & Support
Comparison of Customer Service & Support features of Product A and Product B
Sugar Sell (SugarCRM)
2.3
Ratings
106% below category average
Unanet CRM by Cosential
-
Ratings
Case management3.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Call center management2.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Help desk management2.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Marketing Automation
Comparison of Marketing Automation features of Product A and Product B
Sugar Sell (SugarCRM)
5.5
Ratings
32% below category average
Unanet CRM by Cosential
7.5
Ratings
1% below category average
Lead management6.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Email marketing5.00 Ratings5.00 Ratings
CRM Project Management
Comparison of CRM Project Management features of Product A and Product B
Sugar Sell (SugarCRM)
3.0
Ratings
87% below category average
Unanet CRM by Cosential
8.0
Ratings
5% above category average
Task management4.00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Billing and invoicing management3.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Reporting2.00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
CRM Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of CRM Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Sugar Sell (SugarCRM)
3.3
Ratings
79% below category average
Unanet CRM by Cosential
8.7
Ratings
14% above category average
Forecasting3.00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Pipeline visualization2.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Customizable reports5.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Product A and Product B
Sugar Sell (SugarCRM)
5.5
Ratings
31% below category average
Unanet CRM by Cosential
7.5
Ratings
0% above category average
Custom fields6.00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Custom objects5.00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Scripting environment6.00 Ratings00 Ratings
API for custom integration5.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
Sugar Sell (SugarCRM)
5.5
Ratings
41% below category average
Unanet CRM by Cosential
10.0
Ratings
18% above category average
Single sign-on capability5.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Role-based user permissions6.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Social CRM
Comparison of Social CRM features of Product A and Product B
Sugar Sell (SugarCRM)
3.0
Ratings
84% below category average
Unanet CRM by Cosential
5.0
Ratings
38% below category average
Social data3.00 Ratings5.00 Ratings
Social engagement3.00 Ratings5.00 Ratings
Integrations with 3rd-party Software
Comparison of Integrations with 3rd-party Software features of Product A and Product B
Sugar Sell (SugarCRM)
4.5
Ratings
48% below category average
Unanet CRM by Cosential
5.0
Ratings
38% below category average
Marketing automation5.00 Ratings5.00 Ratings
Compensation management4.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Platform
Comparison of Platform features of Product A and Product B
Sugar Sell (SugarCRM)
4.0
Ratings
59% below category average
Unanet CRM by Cosential
7.0
Ratings
5% below category average
Mobile access4.00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
User Ratings
Sugar Sell (SugarCRM)Unanet CRM by Cosential
Likelihood to Recommend
2.0
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.2
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
3.0
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Availability
10.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
10.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
9.1
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
In-Person Training
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Online Training
8.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Configurability
10.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
10.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Sugar Sell (SugarCRM)Unanet CRM by Cosential
Likelihood to Recommend
The way Community Tax uses Sugar from a users point of view is, it can house a lot of information for either a company or individual with the option of adding additional sub cases . The down side is there are licenses issued per user and 1 per user is not enough because most of the time we are multitasking. Therefore a program/software would be more suitable instead of using a URL.
Read full review
Great for medium and large construction companies that have a specific salesforce.
Read full review
Pros
  • Very easy to set up and configure reports among teams. Very customizable and allows me to build reports that illustrate how the team is performing.
  • Exporting granular reports into excel for in depth analysis and actionable measures.
  • Ability to mass upload lots of information and leads. Important for our team to import lots of information on prospecting clients.
Read full review
  • Inputting of companies and leads who may become prospects.
  • Creating specific opportunities for construction projects.
  • Tracking opportunities through the entire sales cycle.
  • Inputting detailed notes and activity by the Sales team.
Read full review
Cons
  • The back-end programming (logical hooks) for advanced customizations could benefit from a more user-friendly interface
  • General layout could be improved by the addition of modern templates to customize the standard look and feel
  • Support communities could be further improved with the addition of videos on how to do specific configuration, modules.
Read full review
  • The open software is somewhat difficult to master as an administrator.
  • Report writing could be more intuitive.
  • The company seems to cater to larger users.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Our organization will continue to use Sugar as long as it remains cost effective and it addresses the majority of our needs. I will, however, recommend looking into other options once our needs increase and there is additional budget for some bigger named and more robust platform options. I feel if the application was friendlier to end users we would get better productivity as well.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
In the overall usage of the system I still give it a 10 out 10 because it's our day to day system that we use here at work. We all have come to love it because it's quick and easy to use. New updates are given to us by our supervisors or managers and it's easy to do new things in the system. The only Issue like I said before that I'm having is that once I put a payment date and want to modify the dates, it will only allow me to eliminate the date but not put a new one back in.
Read full review
Cosential is very intuitive for the AEC industry and has the ability to be customized for your specific needs. The reports are especially helpful, with good visual dashboards.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
SugarCRM has never been down for us.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Performance
No response time issues ever. Very productive due to its ease of use.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Because it provides us with the necessary support and with the updates that are being made in the system, it allows us to improve our work experience and makes it easier for the entire team. When requesting some type of support it is effective and immediate and with this, it [does not] stagnate our productivity.
Read full review
My original trainer / implementation specialist was fantastic. That relationship has continued, even though I have been officially handed off to the customer service side. The customer service side seems to have higher turnover than normal, but in general they are also very supportive, although not as responsive as I might like.
Read full review
In-Person Training
We feel clasroom training is essential to ensure user adoption and buy-in. Video and on-line training courses gave their place but being in a classroom setting enables the Team to make any potential CRM issues visble right up front.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Online Training
Only part of an implemementation as noted previously.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
Study, study, and study. Be prepared to train everyday until all processes are flowing nicely. The CRM is the elephant and figuring out where to take the first bite can be a challenge. But there is only one way to eat this elephant, one bite at a time. Systematic planning is very important.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
SugarCRM does not stack up well against Bloomreach; we moved away from SugarCRM to Bloomreach, which was much more suited and easily integrated into many different platforms. Bloomreach has a much nicer user interface for debugging and simpler screens for less technical audiences to utilize 3rd. Party support is rarely required, and lots of easy-to-understand documentation is available.
Read full review
Cosential is specific to the A/E industry and is the most intuitive software we found for construction.
Read full review
Scalability
Works from 2-300 Users in our experience.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • I know that SugarCRM has made a positive impact on my day to day work. Since we have made the change to SugarCRM (over a year ago) it has made life easier, more productive, and efficient.
  • Organization is key and this CRM has done this exceptionally for me.
Read full review
  • Allowed for common tracking by business developers in different regions.
  • Helped us quantify effort.
  • Provides great reports for management.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Sugar Sell (SugarCRM) Screenshots

Screenshot of a view of Sugar Sell's contacts listScreenshot of Sugar Sell's analyticsScreenshot of a Sugar Sell dashboard