SpiraTeam vs. SpiraTest

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
SpiraTeam
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
Inflectra SpiraTeam is a project Management solution built around capabilities such as bug tracking, quality assurance, and collaboration.
$57.33
per month per concurrent user
SpiraTest
Score 8.0 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
SpiraTest allows customers to manage their software testing and quality assurance activities. It provides requirements management, test management and bug-tracking functionality with integrated reporting.
$43.66
per month per concurrent user
Pricing
SpiraTeamSpiraTest
Editions & Modules
Cloud
$57.33
per month per concurrent user
Download
$558.00
per year per concurrent user
Cloud
$43.66
per month per concurrent user
Download
$423.66
per year per concurrent user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
SpiraTeamSpiraTest
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsDiscount available for annual billing. Billed by concurrent users (3 minimum). Discount available for larger amount of concurrent users.Discount available for annual billing on Cloud solution. 3 concurrent user minimum. Volume concurrent user discount available.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
SpiraTeamSpiraTest
Features
SpiraTeamSpiraTest
Test Management
Comparison of Test Management features of Product A and Product B
SpiraTeam
-
Ratings
SpiraTest
7.8
Ratings
3% below category average
Centralized test management00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Manage test hosts and schedules00 Ratings7.90 Ratings
Map tests to user stories00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Test execution reporting00 Ratings5.00 Ratings
Defect management00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
SpiraTeamSpiraTest
Small Businesses
Polarion ALM
Polarion ALM
Score 9.8 out of 10
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Score 8.6 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Polarion ALM
Polarion ALM
Score 9.8 out of 10
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
Score 8.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Polarion ALM
Polarion ALM
Score 9.8 out of 10
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
Score 8.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
SpiraTeamSpiraTest
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
8.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
SpiraTeamSpiraTest
Likelihood to Recommend
It is easy to define structures and documentation "modules". This allows for a workgroup-oriented approach and supports SCRUM. However, in the medical device market SCRUM does not work well for documentation. Therefore the modularized approach on the requirements and testing side supports sprint development, while the depth of documentation needed for compliance may not be "ready" and can be completed later.
Read full review
I think SpiraTest is well suited as a test suite, but in situations where the team is already using multiple products from one particular provider, it may be better to go with that provider's test solution. This is because integrations are very important nowadays, and should be considered when picking your project management software. It should be noted that management selected SpiraTest primarily due to the low cost of the test software. I'm less familiar with other test software in the field, but if cost is an issue, you should take a look at SpiraTest.
Read full review
Pros
  • Good Defect Tracking
  • Easy to maintain Test Cycle
  • Configurable Reports
  • Easy to maintain Roles and access
Read full review
  • It is easy to manage requirements.
  • Users and roles are easily managed.
  • Cloning is really helpful to stack all the similar test cases.
Read full review
Cons
  • Reporting could be made a bit easier.
  • Some functions are not always absolutely intuitive.
  • Document baselining can be tricky.
  • Some configuration can only be done in the database and is not explained as by the books.
Read full review
  • Training can be difficult to find at times.
  • Basic reporting can become very verbose unless you set lots of filters and parameters.
  • The ability to customize some of the verbiage in the application would help bridge the gap between translating what SpiraTest's testing terminology is and the company culture uses for testing terminology.
Read full review
Usability
The usability is excellent in most cases but lacks some intuitive functions, such as a copy to the clipboard for selected items. In fact, in an older version, a COPY button copied all selected records rather than putting it on the clipboard. The button has been renamed recently to CLONE, otherwise, my rating would be lower.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
As promised during product selection, SpiraPlan support has always been quick and helpful. Replies almost always come back in hours (and often in an hour or two). And SpiraPlan's online tech support maintains all support conversations online so no need to look through emails to try to recall repllies.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
None Other Used
Read full review
I migrated out of another test management tool mid project to Spira. The Spira import tools made this relatively easy.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Better historical information about what happend in past releases, deeper integration with the whole software development life cycle.
Read full review
  • Most of SpiraPlan is easy and intuitive to use so employees have been quickly productive
  • Artifact linking saves tracking time and is very easy for anyone to do
  • custom test creation will still take a LOT of time
Read full review
ScreenShots

SpiraTest Screenshots

Screenshot of real-time dashboards.Screenshot of an example of the customizable reporting.Screenshot of requirements management.Screenshot of test management.