TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    SonarQube Server

    Score9.5 out of 10
    N/ASonarQube is a code quality and vulnerability solution for development teams that integrates with CI/CD pipelines to ensure the software you produce is secure, reliable, and maintainable.

    $0

    per year per installation

    WSO2 Choreo

    Score8.7 out of 10
    N/ASince WSO2's June 2021 acquisition of Platformer, the company now offers and supports Choreo, the former Platform IPaaS and low-code cloud native engineering for API Developers.

    $0

    1 project, up to 5 components

    Pricing
    SonarQube ServerWSO2 Choreo
    Editions & Modules
    Community
    Free
    Developer EDITION
    starting at $720
    per year per installation
    Enterprise EDITION
    Contact sales for pricing
    per year per installation
    Data Center EDITION
    Contact sales for pricing
    per year per installation
    Free
    $0
    1 project, up to 5 components. $100 in Choreo infrastructure credits per month.
    Pay-As-You-Go
    $150
    per month Up to 10 projects and 30 components. $150 per component per month. Pass-through infrastructure costs.
    Enterprise
    Custom Quote
    per year Unlimited projects and components. Discounts based on annual commitments available. Pass-through infrastructure costs, or use a data plane.
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    SonarQube ServerWSO2 Choreo
    Free Trial
    YesNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    YesYes
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoYes
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details1 step is a maximum of 500ms of compute time. An incoming event, message, or outgoing API call is a minimum of 1 step.
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    SonarQube ServerWSO2 Choreo
    Considered Both Products
    Sonar
    No answer on this topic
    WSO2
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    100%
    Would buy again
    32 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    29 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    32 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    95%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    18 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    27 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Features
    SonarQube ServerWSO2 Choreo
    Platform-as-a-Service
    Comparison of Platform-as-a-Service features of SonarQube Server and Choreo by WSO2
    Feature
    SonarQube Server
    -
    Ratings
    Choreo by WSO2
    8.1
    1 Ratings
    1% above category average
    Ease of building user interfaces00 Ratings7.01 Ratings
    Scalability00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
    Platform management overhead00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
    Workflow engine capability00 Ratings6.01 Ratings
    Platform access control00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
    Services-enabled integration00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
    Development environment creation00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
    Development environment replication00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
    Issue monitoring and notification00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
    Issue recovery00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
    Upgrades and platform fixes00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    SonarQube ServerWSO2 Choreo
    Small Businesses
    No answers on this topic
    IBM Cloud Foundry
    Score6 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    No answers on this topic
    IBM Cloud Private
    Score9.6 out of 10
    Enterprises
    No answers on this topic
    AWS Elastic Beanstalk
    Score7.3 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    SonarQube ServerWSO2 Choreo
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.9
    (35 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    Usability
    9.1
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Support Rating
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    SonarQube ServerWSO2 Choreo
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Sonar
    SonarQube is excellent if you start using it at the beginning when developing a new system, in this situation you will be able to fix things before they become spread and expensive to correct. It’s a bit less suitable to use on existing code with bad design as it’s usually too expensive to fix everything and only allows you to ensure the situation doesn’t get worse.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    WSO2
    While you are developing your code, my case is codes for bots, you'll have more power and if you have an API ally that shows forecasts of latencies and throughputs: Choreo by WS02 is that friend. It is very ideal in giving insights on intelligent data mapping, code anomalies as you develop the codes or applications.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Sonar
    • Detecting bugs and vulnerabilities: SonarQube can identify a wide range of bugs and vulnerabilities in code, such as null pointer exceptions, SQL injection, and cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks. It uses static analysis to analyze the code and identify potential issues, and it can also integrate with dynamic analysis tools to provide even more detailed analysis.
    • Measuring code quality: SonarQube can measure a wide range of code quality metrics, such as cyclomatic complexity, duplicated code, and code coverage. This can help teams understand the quality of their code and identify areas that need improvement.
    • Providing actionable insights: SonarQube provides detailed information about issues in the code, including the file and line number where the issue occurs and the severity of the issue. This makes it easy for developers to understand and address issues in the code.
    • Integrating with other tools: SonarQube can be integrated with a wide range of development tools and programming languages, such as Git, Maven, and Java. This allows teams to use SonarQube in their existing development workflow and take advantage of its powerful code analysis capabilities.
    • Managing technical debt: SonarQube provides metrics and insights on the technical debt on the codebase, enabling teams to better prioritize issues to improve the quality of the code.
    • Compliance with coding standards: SonarQube can check the code against industry standards like OWASP, CWE and more, making sure the code is compliant with security and coding standards.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    WSO2
    • Provides feedback in real time which sorts most of the API performance challenges.
    • Displays the estimated application performance as you compose your code.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Sonar
    • Importing a new custom quality profile on SonarQube is a bit tricky, it can be made easier
    • Every second time when we want to rerun the server, we have to restart the whole system, otherwise, the server stops and closes automatically
    • When we generate a new report a second time and try to access the report, it shows details of the old report only and takes a lot of time to get updated with the details of the new and fresh report generated
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    WSO2
    • Latency curves may be inaccurate sometimes or provide over/under estimates
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Sonar
    It can improve in some user experience and usability parts, like the code view and the way we assign issues it's a bit hidden and not highlighted
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    WSO2
    No answers on this topic
    Support Rating
    Sonar
    We we easily able to integrate the SonarQube steps into our TFS process via the Microsoft Marektplace, we didn't have the need to call SonarQube support. We've used their online documentation and community forum if we ran into any issues.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    WSO2
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    Sonar
    SonarQube is an open-source. It's a scalable product. The costs for this application, for the kind of job it does, are pretty descent. Pipeline scan is more secured in SonarQube. Its a very good tool and its support multiple languages. Its main core competency is of static code analysis and that is why SonarQube exists and it does it exceedingly well. The quality of scan on code convention, best practices, coding standards, unit test coverage etc makes them one of the best competent tool in the market
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    WSO2
    No answers on this topic
    Return on Investment
    Sonar
    • Positive ROI from the standpoint of flagging several issues that would have otherwise likely been unaddressed and caused more time to be spent closer to launch
    • Slightly positive ROI from time-saving perspective (it's an automated check which is nice, but depending on the issues it finds, can take developers time to investigate and resolve)
    Read full review
    WSO2
    • over 90 percent accuracy in performance prediction of bots under development
    • It's possible to trace on faulty codes, down to the machine-level details.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    SonarQube Server Screenshots

    Screenshot of Application Status.Screenshot of Portfolio Overview.Screenshot of Taint Analysis.

    WSO2 Choreo Screenshots

    Screenshot of Simultaneous graphical view and code viewScreenshot of API lifecycle managementScreenshot of Automated deploymentScreenshot of API marketplaceScreenshot of Deep observabilityScreenshot of AI-assisted development