Snap Audition vs. Submittable

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Snap Audition
Score 7.7 out of 10
N/A
Snap Audition brings together audition management, registration, and judging, in one affordable platform. Online or in-person, Snap will help an audition run smoothly. College music auditions, school band placements, dance, art, and beyond; Snap Audition is for any type and size of audition. Snap Auditions saves audition managers and judges time, and improves quality by doing what you would typically need 10+ pieces of software to do.…N/A
Submittable
Score 8.8 out of 10
N/A
Submittable offers tools to launch, measure, and grow social impact programs, locally and globally. From grants and scholarships to awards and CSR programs, Submittable partners with users to make a difference. The vendor states Submittable has supported over 95,000 social impact programs, receiving nearly 20 million applications, and that teams save an average of 12 hours per week and launch in an average of 14 days.N/A
Pricing
Snap AuditionSubmittable
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Snap AuditionSubmittable
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Snap AuditionSubmittable
User Ratings
Snap AuditionSubmittable
Likelihood to Recommend
7.7
(0 ratings)
8.9
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
6.6
(0 ratings)
7.9
(0 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
In-Person Training
-
(0 ratings)
8.1
(0 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Snap AuditionSubmittable
Likelihood to Recommend
I previously mentioned the scoring system. I would like to be able to use decimals and have multiple categories to score (for percussion, for example, a separate score for timpani, keys, and snare drum, in addition to a total score). I also suspect that some of the videos didn't load because students uploaded the wrong format, so more accepted formats might be helpful. I had some that would freeze halfway through the video, so it clearly wasn't a format issue
Read full review
Submittable is great for grant management, grantmaking, and scholarship awards. It's a very useful tool also when there are multiple reviewers and committees involved in the assessment of the application. The table feature is helpful, but to download the information in a usable report is a pain. Overall a very useful tool for funding.
Read full review
Pros
  • Communication from Snap team
  • Functionality for different audition modes
  • Decent level of customization
Read full review
  • Easy to use! Resulting in confidence and independence when using platform.
  • Exporting reports to Excel files makes internal data sharing a breeze.
  • Tech support for grantees frees administrators from resolving issues on their own.
  • Automatic and customizable communications with applicants and grantees.
Read full review
Cons
  • Some videos wouldn't load properly, creating challenges for students. Perhaps widen the scope of formats accepted.
  • More nuance in the scoring would be helpful, especially the use of decimals in the point system.
Read full review
  • It used to be easier to download submission files from the submissions screen; now, you have to run a report and request a download.
  • Giving access to reviewers could be easier. It would be nice if we could create the email account and password and then give that to the reviewer. Right now, the invites are often junk, spam, or quarantine.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
No answers on this topic
Submittable is easy to use for our applicants, streamlines the grantmaking process and provides structures for a range of reviewers on our panels. i like that you continue to come up with new tools, although I wish many didn't come with additional costs.
Read full review
Usability
I can imagine that it might provide some drawbacks but I only experienced the platform as a judge, not a coordinator
Read full review
Submittable is very user-friendly. As both a application builder and an applicant myself I find the system intuitive and easy. Many pre-populated questions allow a grant administrator to build an application quickly. The start-up time we first joined as a Submittable client was fast, too. Submittable does not take much time for a first-time user to understand.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
No answers on this topic
We have thankfully never experienced an outage nor been affected by a technology issue on Submittable's side that has delayed our grant process. We have instead been able to distribute over $6M in donated dollars to AAPI small business owners because Submittable is trustworthy and available
Read full review
Performance
No answers on this topic
We've had a quick and efficient submittable experience that has always been easy to use. When we need a report it downloads within seconds, even the larger reports are 30 seconds or less to download. Pages are quick to load and reports complete in a more than reasonable time frame
Read full review
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
I think that they are good at answering our questions and solving our problems. We occasionally get reports from applicants about problems the Submittable team has not solved, but I do not know what the applicant has done to get the problem solved.
Read full review
In-Person Training
No answers on this topic
We have been using this for many years but my memory is that we had a
human walk us through how to use basic features. We also used the
resource library to learn about specific topics or issues as they came
up.
Read full review
Online Training
No answers on this topic
10/10 because we were able to meet virtually and still get all of our questions answered! Online was effective too because we could easily record the sessions and review them later. Since we had to onboard our reviewers virtually, it was actually convenient that this was the same method we learned how to use the entire program virtually too.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
No answers on this topic
I would say, provide Submittable as much detailed information on your planned use of the platform and your desires with the platform as possible, and the implementation will be tailored to accommodate your organization with minimal lag time and issues/problems.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Get Acceptd is basically the only other service out there doing this kind of work. Their price point makes it entirely unusable for almost any organization.
Read full review
When we decided on Submittable: a) Most cost-effective: solution would cost under USD3,000 per year with no setup fee. b) We needed key features of this solution that were available out-of-the-box, e.g., Online Application Form -- including answers to approximately 20-30 questions, completing a financial income/expense summary spreadsheet, and submitting supporting docs in Word, PDF, or other common file formats. Also, applicants would get instant feedback if they do not qualify, so they won't even bother completing their submission. Backend workflow allows up to 8+ committee members/reviewers to review application submissions, submit and share comments/questions, approve/reject, grant amount recommendations, etc. Basic reporting will include lists of applicants and key data by submission year (e.g., contact details, funding requested, key metrics, etc.). Email alerts to reviewers as applications are submitted. Summary of completed application emailed to applicant upon submission so they have a copy for their records—the ability to centrally track any email exchanges with applicants.
Read full review
Scalability
No answers on this topic
We have been easily able to grow. Not only are we able to process different applications, but Submittable makes it easy to add applications onto our plan. Additionally, their eligibility form before the application does a good job of screening applicants so we do not pay for extra applications.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • More trust in us from our membership due to smoothness of process
  • More students are auditioning for our honor choirs than ever before
Read full review
  • We were able to launch our first-ever community grants program on time, and received over 300 applications (we were anticipating ~50 in our first year out.)
  • This has substantially improved our application and tracking capabilities for our employee relief fund grants, and ensured we are following IRS guidelines.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Snap Audition Screenshots

Screenshot of Custom Registration FormsScreenshot of Audition Setup AuditScreenshot of Registration Fee CollectionScreenshot of Automatic Anonymity for JudgingScreenshot of Scoring Scheme WizardScreenshot of Judge Setup