ReadyAPI vs. WebLOAD

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
ReadyAPI
Score 7.0 out of 10
N/A
ReadyAPI (formerly SoapUI Pro, LoadUI Pro, and ServiceV Pro) is a REST and SOAP API functional testing tool that enables software developers, QA engineers, and manual testers to work together to create, maintain, and execute complex end-to-end API tests in their CI/CD pipelines without needing to code.N/A
WebLOAD
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
WebLOAD from global, Israel-headquartered RadView Software, is an enterprise class load and performance testing tool.
$0.15
per Virtual User Hour Up to 500 Concurrent VU
Pricing
ReadyAPIWebLOAD
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
On demand (Pay as you go)
$0.15
per Virtual User Hour Up to 500 Concurrent VU
Monthly Subscription
$499
per month Up to 500 Concurrent VU
Professional
Custom Quote
Enterprise
Custom Quote
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
ReadyAPIWebLOAD
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
ReadyAPIWebLOAD
Features
ReadyAPIWebLOAD
Load Testing
Comparison of Load Testing features of Product A and Product B
ReadyAPI
-
Ratings
WebLOAD
10.0
Ratings
17% above category average
End to end performance management00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Integrated performance data00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Deployment model flexibility00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Real time monitoring00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Automated anomaly detection00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
ReadyAPIWebLOAD
Small Businesses
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Score 8.6 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
Oracle Application Testing Suite (legacy)
Oracle Application Testing Suite (legacy)
Score 8.0 out of 10
ReadyAPI
ReadyAPI
Score 7.0 out of 10
Enterprises
SoapUI Open Source
SoapUI Open Source
Score 8.7 out of 10
ReadyAPI
ReadyAPI
Score 7.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
ReadyAPIWebLOAD
Likelihood to Recommend
7.0
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
7.3
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
9.9
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Availability
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
8.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
7.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
7.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
ReadyAPIWebLOAD
Likelihood to Recommend
As stated, we do a LOT of API testing, the swaggerhub import makes it easy to add APIs. This is very well-suited, as well as easy management of the steps/cases/suites inside of ReadyAPI. The one thing I do wish ReadyAPI was better suited for is changes to data, we have a lot of test cases in ReadyAPI and if we make a change to how the backend data is structured, one-by-one adjustments need to be made to the steps. Less appropriate, UI testing.
Read full review
WebLOAD is an imperative tool for our web manager and developers team. We rely heavily on this in our daily activities, mainly to run script testing (in record time) of new code prior to our build releases. This product helps us identify potential gaps and issues with the user flow and allows us to make adjustments and fix problems before they make it into the live production site. Our team also depends on this software to run multiple load testing of each server in preparation for heavy timeframes of the year, such as Cyber Monday, Black Friday, etc. Our team members brought up that they would love to see more scripting examples of how to use WebLOAD, which would make their job easier.
Read full review
Pros
  • SoapUI NG Pro is a prefect tool for setting up complicated test cases with many steps including parameterized Web Service requests, response assertions, data generators, data sources, data sinks (report recorders) and more
  • You can use Groovy or JavaScript for more complicated automation such as validating the results, extracting data, using external Java libraries or running system processes. Groovy IDE is compatible with Java and you can easily write your code in Java with very few modifications.
  • SoapUI enables you to run multiple test suites in parallel or in a loop, and provide user friendly reports including all test case results and test case coverage.
  • SoapUI NG Pro lets you to perform security test against your web services with predefined scenarios such as xml bombing, xml injection, sql injection, buffer overflow tests, monkey testing and so on.
  • SoapUI NG Pro, offers a simple but practical solution for low to medium load testing scenarios. You can obtain many more Load and Performance testing features by extending your license with purchasing LoadUI Pro.
Read full review
  • Load testing of increased traffic during peak hours
  • Reporting of script runs before new code releases
  • Identifies issues and problems with the code before this makes it into the live site
Read full review
Cons
  • REST - They have come a long way, but there could still be improvements here. I find the learning curve much higher and not as straight forward using REST vs SOAP.
  • Composite Projects - I'd really like to see them implement something around saving/refreshing Test Suites when using the Composite project ability in Pro. This is currently an enhancement in feature backlog (see their forum for more details). Functionality around Projects and Test Cases seems pretty sound.
Read full review
  • The load time of running a testing script can be long at times
  • It would be helpful to have multiple users/ devices to run under one membership
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
I would definitely renew the ReadyAPI as I was pretty happy while using it. But then I switched my job, and the current workplace is using Postman so we are using it for now. Plus, I don't have any issues with Postman. At the end of the day, it about selecting the tool that gets your work done more efficiently.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
SoapUI allows us to combine multiple tests and adhere
to the sequence that they need to run in order to complete successfully.
It has an excellent GUI design and the reporting mechanism is also very
good. It does consume a lot of memory though during concurrent testing
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Reliability and Availability
Soap UI has managed to continuously build on it's solid foundation and keep improving by each release. It is by far the most dependable and accurate testing tool out there of its kind. Available via connecting to VM's created as SoapUI test machines give access to it anytime, anywhere practically.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Performance
It has an excellent GUI design and the reporting mechanism is also very
good. It does consume a lot of memory though during concurrent testing.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
For my purposes, the provided help features have been sufficient. I am sure I would be better off if I were to spend more time studying the app. For now, I load a project, connect, and execute. It just works.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
no very easy but lacks documentation
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
I have not used other API testing products but I am completely satisfied with the functionality and performance of ReadyAPI. It covers all required API protocols and database connections that are used in our organization. It also allows extending the functionality by adding external DB drivers and wiring custom scripts when the native assertion/data manipulation test steps are not sufficient.
Read full review
There are many similar comparable products on the market, but with WebLOAD, the price point was reasonable. Their sales and engineering teams and very friendly and helpful and make our implementation a breeze. I would definitely renew our contract and recommend this to anyone out there looking for the best load-testing tool!
Read full review
Scalability
It has an excellent GUI design and the reporting mechanism is also very
good. It does consume a lot of memory though during concurrent testing. However, I have read that added monitoring tools have been added, which if so the 7 could possibly go to a 8 or 9.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • We were able to achieve our needs in API test automation with the tool
  • In terms ROI, I would say that we have gotten what is basically needed
  • Though the initial setup was tough, after that we were able to continue it with user friendly UI and reporting.
  • Overall, it had [a] neutral impact in terms [of] ROI.
Read full review
  • Increased ROI by discovering any performance issues ahead of time, and allowing us to fix them before making it into production.
  • Improved efficiencies with DevOps.
  • Increased productivity through the automated reports feature.
Read full review
ScreenShots

WebLOAD Screenshots

Screenshot of WebLOAD's transaction screenScreenshot of performance measurementsScreenshot of the session view