SimpleStage vs. Usersnap

Usersnap is well suited for web applications that are maintained/developed in house, to provide a means of communicating with end-users directly without the need to develop an in-house solution. It allows end-users to provide rich information about an issue they're experiencing, even providing information about the user's browser, session, and desktop environment, which is invaluable when trying to debug or troubleshoot an issue.

Incentivized

• Organize customer feedback.
• Provide an easy to use, feature-rich widget that allows users to highlight, comment and even draw on a screenshot of your application.
• Screenshots that are sent to you include meta-data like the browser user agent, browser console data, screen resolution, etc.

Incentivized

• When you go into the list of Usersnap feedback you have submitted, there isn't search functionality or filtering so that you can see the feedback of a certain type at a time, or see if you submitted that feedback already.

Incentivized

I am unsure how to rate the support of Usersnap as I did not contact support yet. The tool works well as is. The agency we work with that used the tool didn't need to contact Usersnap support as well. I'm sure the user support on the tool is adequate.

Incentivized

I haven't used anything else. I just used email and Google Docs before and that's hard to keep straight what you are talking about within a document to what it actually is on the website. Also, more phone calls are required to explain what you mean and need.

Incentivized

• Fewer errors on-site QA
• Less time wasted in the site QA

Incentivized