F5 Distributed Cloud Bot Defense vs. Vulcan Cyber (discontinued)

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
F5 Distributed Cloud Bot Defense
Score 8.7 out of 10
N/A
F5 Distributed Cloud Bot Defense (formerly Shape Defense, acquired January 2020) provides security to protect a website from bots, fake users, and unauthorized transactions, preventing large scale fraud and eroded user experiences. Companies get visibility, detection and mitigation outcomes to reduce fraud and cloud hosting, bandwidth and compute costs, improve user experiences, and optimize their business based on real human traffic.N/A
Vulcan Cyber (discontinued)
Score 7.5 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
Vulcan Cyber was an exposure and vulnerability risk mitigation platform, acquired by Tenable in early 2025. The product is no longer available for sale, and functionality has been integrated into the Tenable One Exposure Management platform's vulnerability solution.N/A
Pricing
F5 Distributed Cloud Bot DefenseVulcan Cyber (discontinued)
Editions & Modules
Enterprise
Custom Quote
per year
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
F5 Distributed Cloud Bot DefenseVulcan Cyber (discontinued)
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
F5 Distributed Cloud Bot DefenseVulcan Cyber (discontinued)
Features
F5 Distributed Cloud Bot DefenseVulcan Cyber (discontinued)
Threat Intelligence
Comparison of Threat Intelligence features of Product A and Product B
F5 Distributed Cloud Bot Defense
-
Ratings
Vulcan Cyber (discontinued)
7.9
Ratings
0% below category average
Network Analytics00 Ratings7.70 Ratings
Vulnerability Classification00 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Automated Alerts and Reporting00 Ratings7.40 Ratings
Threat Analysis00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Automated Threat Identification00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Vulnerability Management Tools
Comparison of Vulnerability Management Tools features of Product A and Product B
F5 Distributed Cloud Bot Defense
-
Ratings
Vulcan Cyber (discontinued)
7.3
Ratings
10% below category average
IT Asset Realization00 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Configuration Monitoring00 Ratings6.40 Ratings
Vulnerability Intelligence00 Ratings7.40 Ratings
Best Alternatives
F5 Distributed Cloud Bot DefenseVulcan Cyber (discontinued)
Small Businesses
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.7 out of 10
Action1
Action1
Score 9.5 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Veracode
Veracode
Score 8.7 out of 10
Action1
Action1
Score 9.5 out of 10
Enterprises
Veracode
Veracode
Score 8.7 out of 10
CrowdStrike Falcon
CrowdStrike Falcon
Score 9.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
F5 Distributed Cloud Bot DefenseVulcan Cyber (discontinued)
Likelihood to Recommend
8.7
(0 ratings)
7.2
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.5
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
8.2
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
7.1
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
F5 Distributed Cloud Bot DefenseVulcan Cyber (discontinued)
Likelihood to Recommend
I'd strongly recommend it, but with a few caveats depending on how mature the team is with behavioral based security tools. One of our fintech clients was getting hit with low volume, widely spread login attempts, below our rate limiting thresholds. F5 Distributed Cloud Bot Defense was able to flag abnormal input timings, inconsistent device fingerprinting and high entropy in field population behavior. You can only imagine the wave of downstream account lockouts this saved the client. On the other end we had a client with a real time trading platform using Graphql over websockets. F5 Distributed Cloud Bot Defense wasn't able to tap into that stream natively. we had to reverse engineer a proxy layer to inspect events. It worked but it was clunky and not officially supported
Read full review
We use Vulcan Cyber to help with the technical debt accrued over time with systems that were not maintained as well as they should be. To combat this, we use the campaign feature to keep a running tab on every system to ensure it is brought up to standards and maintained.
Read full review
Pros
  • Regularly analyze traffic patterns and bot activity. Use the insights provided by the platform to refine rules and policies.
  • Configure rules to specify acceptable behavior for user interactions and alter sensitivity levels as appropriate to reduce false positives.
  • Integrate F5 Bot Defense into our existing security stack, which may include WAFs (Web Application Firewalls) and SIEM (Security Information and Event Management) solutions.
Read full review
  • The user interface makes it very easy to use.
  • It provides a clear picture and helps us to make decisions.
  • It offers automation and risk visibility.
Read full review
Cons
  • On a technical side, we've had a lot of deployment issues. This is not a one-sprint solution.
  • We ran into undocumented failure modes and had to rely on L2 and L3 customer support, delaying troubleshooting significantly [in our experience].
  • Accurate log ingestion is a larger challenge than one would want in a security tool.
Read full review
  • Deduping of assets could be better.
  • The weighting of vulnerabilities is hard to describe to non technical executives.
  • The Business Groups and Tagging needs improvement. Or at least allow tags to be removed if not needed. Now they are static from the API feed.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
We are more likely than not, to renew it. It saved us from a really huge data breach 4 months ago. It has earned its shower so far
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Official support can sometimes take time to reach the right people. However, once you are in contact with the appropriate experts, the support is excellent, as F5 staff are true specialists. On the other hand, we always receive prompt assistance from our local sales team, who typically help us connect with the right people quickly.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
Implementation of Distributed Cloud is accomplished a few different ways, it would pay to meet with the F5 team and map out your implementation prior to acquisition to make sure you Infrastructure and Operations teams are aligned to the approach and requirements.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Clodflare bot management was our other obvious option for us. We tested it on a staging version of our RFQ platform. It was great for broad traffic filtering but had a hard time with nuanced differences between real subcontractors and low volume bots mimickingt human input whereas that's where F5 Distributed Cloud Bot Defense thrived
Read full review
Vulcan was easier to implement with our existing Security environment. The UX and UI were more intuitive and user-friendly. While SOAR is a super solid product, for our business Vulcan made more sense. It was more of a natural fit for a rapidly-expanding company in a hyper-growth phase using Edge technology.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • We experience large web/data scraping attack campaigns and F5 Distributed Cloud Bot Defense over the years has helped mitigate these for us and significantly reducing load off of our origin servers.
  • Also, we experience many large Credential Stuffing attacks and F5 Distributed Cloud Bot Defense helps us stop these attacks and protects our customers.
Read full review
  • Allows much better prioritizing of which assets are most vulnerable
  • Allow a better understanding of what assets are actually under real threat vs. what is assumed to be vulnerable, but the real world fact is the system would be hard to reach internally, so it's not as vulnerable.
Read full review
ScreenShots