DaXtra Parser vs. Affinda Resume Parser

The high volume of resume intake and a need to reduce parsing manpower. Great for basic information such as contact information and to create records in ATS.

Incentivized

Affinda makes sense in bigger teams where you are dealing with lots of CVs. For smaller companies or low volumes I don't think it would make as much sense.

• Move basic information into Bullhorn
• Integrate with email

Incentivized

• Very cost-effective, as [it's] currently free
• Gathers the right data quickly
• Ease of identifying specific skills for a candidate
• Easy to use format of the outputs of the system

• The information the parses
• Ability to carry over and read information to complete fields in Bullhorn

Incentivized

• Not being in the same timezone as their technical team slowed us down a little

Responsive and able to resolve issues quickly.

Incentivized

Quick responsiveness to inquiries. Willingness to customize the product to the customer's needs.

Affinda was an easy decision, for us, after our evaluations. They were one of two companies (out of four) with the kind of quality we were looking for, had better customer service, and much more attractive commercial terms at our volume.

• Helped decrease parse time of resume applications from email
• Ease to create ATS records of candidates from job boards

Incentivized

• Saving time with processing CVs
• Saving money on previous competitor