Responsive vs. Sofon Proposal Organizer

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Responsive
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
Responsive (formerly RFPIO), headquartered in Beaverton, offers their proposal management and automation software, featuring import and export, proposal knowledgebase and answer library, evaluation intake forms, and project management tools (e.g. Gantt chart) associated to proposal tracking.N/A
Sofon Proposal Organizer
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
Sofon Proposal Organizer is more than a simple proposal generator. Per their website "Sofon Proposal Organizer takes care of requirements analysis, product configuration, three dimensional product visualization (when applicable), calculation of sales prices and margins, calculation of cost, generation of complete multi-level bills of material and routings and the production of all relevant documents including proposals, contracts and any internally required document."N/A
Pricing
ResponsiveSofon Proposal Organizer
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
ResponsiveSofon Proposal Organizer
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
ResponsiveSofon Proposal Organizer
Features
ResponsiveSofon Proposal Organizer
Proposal Creation & Organization
Comparison of Proposal Creation & Organization features of Product A and Product B
Responsive
7.4
Ratings
8% below category average
Sofon Proposal Organizer
-
Ratings
Proposal branding8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Proposal templates5.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Proposal content library updates9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Guided proposal creation8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Searchable proposal database7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Proposal Collaboration & Workflow
Comparison of Proposal Collaboration & Workflow features of Product A and Product B
Responsive
7.4
Ratings
9% below category average
Sofon Proposal Organizer
-
Ratings
RFP management & response8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Proposal collaboration & approval8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
User permissions/proposal editing controls9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Sales proposal workflow6.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Proposal automation user interface6.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Proposal Delivery
Comparison of Proposal Delivery features of Product A and Product B
Responsive
8.0
Ratings
1% below category average
Sofon Proposal Organizer
-
Ratings
Proposal distribution8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Interactive proposals8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Proposal content tracking8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
ResponsiveSofon Proposal Organizer
Small Businesses
QuoteWerks
QuoteWerks
Score 9.4 out of 10
QuoteWerks
QuoteWerks
Score 9.4 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
QuoteWerks
QuoteWerks
Score 9.4 out of 10
QuoteWerks
QuoteWerks
Score 9.4 out of 10
Enterprises
Conga CPQ
Conga CPQ
Score 8.5 out of 10
Conga CPQ
Conga CPQ
Score 8.5 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
ResponsiveSofon Proposal Organizer
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(0 ratings)
7.1
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.7
(0 ratings)
7.5
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
9.8
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
10.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
ResponsiveSofon Proposal Organizer
Likelihood to Recommend
1. RFPIO is perfect for searching for specific information when you are responding to an RFP. Search engine is powerful. We narrow our search using several customized filters and know we are getting a thorough search. 2. Excel responses work very well in RFPIO. 3. Typical RFPs that are formatted in Word are challenging to run via RFPIO. We struggle with this. 4. We have yet to master the template.
Read full review
In my opinion, the most valuable characteristic of SPO is that by answering simple questions a very complex product can be configured; therefore the scope of delivery is defined very well. In addition, SPO has great flexibility to manage prices and costs. However, SPO is configurator of parts that allows incorporating basic design rules for their selection. SPO is not a optimised for developing complicated engineering design rules.
Read full review
Pros
  • Import/export - the configurations during import and export are invaluable. This saves us so much time during export with the amount of things we have pre-formatted. Additionally, this tool can handle export into native formats OR customized templates for Word, Excel, and PDF. This means we can export into Excel from outside tools, as well as utilize client/broker formats when needed - without minimal copy/paste (RFP friends... can I get an amen??)
  • Auto-response - once a questionnaire is uploaded, the system can auto-respond based on past responses. It gets smarter over time as more responses are in the system. We find this picks up 25-40% on the low end and 90% on the high end (especially when we are responding to the same broker or consultant who has their preferred template)
  • Keyword Field Mapping - the system allows you to map fields into your export template as well as your responses. The system auto maps these when exporting. We use this feature a lot to map salesperson info (custom fields for the stuff we want on the cover sheet/letter), client name, client nickname (the company, the client, the City, the County, etc.). This makes it easy to have customized responses without extra effort on our side.
  • Guest Question Authors - the system allows you to send single questions to guest users easily so that they can answer via a web browser on a computer or laptop without signing in. I also particularly like that I can track it as a comment which helps me go back later and find my open items.
Read full review
  • Sofware works correctly with no crashes
  • Sofon's support is quick and efficient
  • User-friendly interface
  • Easy maintenability
  • Wide range of Sofon products allows for expanding the software scope
Read full review
Cons
  • For questions that contain generalized words, the ability to pinpoint better responses with AI.
  • As an end user, I always start with the Answers tab. It would be nice for RFPIO to open on the Answers tab, because I always go there first (learn my preferences).
  • It would be nice to have guided paths the first time I open after new enhancements have been added.
Read full review
  • Give us an easier way to configure from an admin point of view
  • More reporting possibilities
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
UI is friendly. Basically that alone is enough to renew because it is easy to use and gives accurate and fast results. The effective cross collaboration from other colleagues in my organization also makes for this tool to be extremely effective. Now that I understand how to use it, I can also easily train others on how to use it effectively.
Read full review
Generally speaking the company is satisfied with SPO; knowledge on how to use SPO and on how to code in the product have been developed, and has led to good results. In addition, customer service provided by Sofon is efficient and quick. Finally, SPO guarantees that product -specific knowledge stays in-house, reducing the risk of 'knowledge leakage to competitors.
Read full review
Support Rating
The response time and attitude from the RFPIO team is extraordinary. I always feel like I am their only customer - that's how exemplary their customer service is! When we have a suggestion, it is addressed and escalated - ultimately it is resolved to meet (and exceed!) our expectations. The RFPIO team works collaboratively with us, coaching us on new features until we can use them with confidence. Webinars. User conferences. Clear and useable communication. Every method of "training up" is leveraged so that users can feel comfortable and are successful using the tool. AMAZING!
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
We were able to complete an RFP during our free trial. We were already leaning toward RFPIO but that pushed us over the edge.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
At the time, three years ago, we evaluated Loopio as an alternative to RFPIO. Loopio didn't have the same resources as far as dynamic branding, content segmentation ability and was less price competitive than RFPIO. RFPIO also has an unlimited user model where you are not charged per user like many other RFP automation solutions. This makes the price much more scalable and also allows for creative engineering as far as use of the system
Read full review
The previous product we used was developed by ourselves so my experience is very limited. I can say that having a software like SPO we can configure the product without any programming experience and this makes things faster and better. Moreover, I can say that MS Office compatibility is a strong point.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Our response time has gone from 2 weeks, to around 24hrs of addressing an RFP
  • We have seen considerable savings with reallocated headcount and reduced effort spent on other critical areas
  • Our previous process had a blind spot when it came to visibility. Now we have 100% visibility across the organization.
Read full review
  • Fast lead conversion
  • Increased sales representatives effort
Read full review
ScreenShots