ActiveBatch Workload Automation vs. Redwood RunMyJobs

Any large business or organisation that wants to manage their workload effectively and with the least amount of room for error might choose the ActiveBatch Automation tool. Being a consultant I feel that It aids in task automation and has the flexibility to change in response to varying company requirements. It helps to save huge time by doing all the repetitive tasks on daily basis. During the patching activity the schedulers can be stopped. It also help by alerting us if any system/job is down so that SLA can be saved. Overall ActiveBatch Automation stands as a dependable cornerstone for ensuring the seamless operation of our tasks.

Incentivized

For scheduling the jobs and monitoring purpose there is no comparison in the market of Redwood tools. Because everything is almost present in this tools at the very suitable price. According to me the most like scenario is the transportation of jobs as well as easy creation. I hope redwood will provide more options in future for users.

Incentivized

• Makes scheduling easy to understand, follow, and rerun jobs when necessary.
• Allows for cross-team coordination of scheduled tasks which reduces errors.
• Makes stopping jobs easy when needed for server/database downtime.
• Scripting enables us to easily change email addresses for failed job alerts.
• Nested plans/jobs make creating and changing dependencies simple.

Incentivized

• SAP Batch Scheduling - This is THE BEST tool for triggering SAP jobs, bar none.
• User management- Other scheduling tools make it much more difficult to manage user access. Redwood user access management is a breeze and take less than half the time it take in other products.
• Scheduling Flexibility- The ease with which you can make custom time windows with Redwood is one of my favorite pluses. You can build as simple or as complex of a time window as you need to with Redwood.
• Support- The support that you get from Redwood is in my opinion the best in the world. I have dealt with all the big name players in IT and they all pale in comparison to Redwood. You will never feel like you are in it alone with the best support in the world right at your fingertips.

• String handling / parsing. I find myself using PowerShell to do a fair amount of text parsing (particularly if manipulations are needed) - not necessarily a bad thing, but certainly a place where ActiveBatch could be improved.
• Debugging - or lack of it! With no stepping debugger, it can be a longer process than many other programming / scripting environments: rather than simply stepping through and observing state changes, I find myself inserting logging steps to excess, then having to clean them up once the error is found.
• The perennial - Documentation! While a near-universal complaint for *any* software, ActiveBatch's developer documentation is somewhat spotty - just where I need detail, I find summary-level info. There is lots of documentation (as there should be for a tool with such a wide range of applications), but it is in mixed formats (some PDF, some CHM), and the descriptions of specific fields within job steps is often little more than I can get in a tool-tip in the GUI. Allowable ranges, expected formats for string data, and similar helpful details are inconsistent.
• The KnowledgeBase at ASCI's web site often has examples which answer the questions I have, but not always - and not always under the search terms one would think to use.

• During day light saving, we need to change the date and time manually. If it can be automatically change based day light saving , very helpful for sap support team.
• The tool should be extended, as it has lot of options, it is easy to deploy, manage. Integrate with Incident Management tools.
• The Redwood Software can be a little difficult. So please try make as simple as possible.

Being in the cloud is a big help, with less hardware to maintain, the patches and updates are fast and easily done, we have built a good working relationship with Redwood.

We can easily add new plans/jobs in our batch schedules. Also, coordination with reporting and QA jobs is simple to do. Building schedules, restarting jobs, triggering dependencies is easy to understand. The system is very stable and allows us to easily see overall processing times.

Incentivized

The Redwood user interface is straightforward. The script can be used to renew the Redwood license by just copying the text from the. txt file from start to finish of license. The current page and the status of the work can both be refreshed automatically by setting a timer in Redwood. Redwood software's eye-catching features include online help through documentation and help support, which may be accessed by clicking the "I" button in the top right corner.

Incentivized

My colleague contacted them directly, I only know hearsay on this but it was not good.

Incentivized

It seems many pressing issues have to be escalated to their dev team, which I believe is mostly overseas. The response time isn't always the greatest. I go back to the documentation as well, if that was better there would be less need of support from myself. There are also times when they figure out the resolution, it has to be included with a fix in which you have to wait for the next release, however long that may be. Update - the support response time and quality of answers has greatly increased in the past 6 months or more.

The workload automation solution is based on the specific needs of an organization, as well as the features, capabilities, and costs of various solutions. A thorough evaluation process and consideration of these factors can help ensure the selection of a solution that aligns with overall business objectives and meets the specific needs of the organization.

Incentivized

I don't have any first-hand experience using or analysing Redwood Workload Automation or any other workload automation technologies because I'm an AI language model. Yet, according to market analysis and user reviews, Redwood Workload Automation is renowned for its adaptability, usability, and scalability, making it a well-liked option for businesses seeking a dependable and effective automation solution. Redwood Workload Automation's capability to automate complicated business processes across several platforms and apps is one of its main advantages. Organizations can easily create, schedule, and monitor workflows thanks to its user-friendly interface and intuitive drag-and-drop capability, and it can be integrated with a variety of systems and apps to offer a complete automation solution. Scalability is another asset of Redwood Workload Automation. It is capable of managing massive automation projects, and because to its distributed architecture, it can perform workflows concurrently across several servers, speeding up processing and maximizing efficiency. Redwood Workload Automation stands out for its user-friendly interface, scalability, and ability to integrate with a wide range of systems and applications, even though other workload automation tools such as BMC Control-M, IBM Workload Automation, CA Atomic Workload Automation, Microsoft System Center Orchestrator, and Cisco Workload Automation also offer similar functionalities.

• ActiveBatch can automate intricate procedures and minimise manual involvement, which can boost an organization's production and efficiency.
• Organisations can save money by using ActiveBatch to automate operations, which lowers the expenses of manual labour and potential mistakes.
• Implementing ActiveBatch could come with hefty up-front expenses including licencing, instruction, and consultancy fees, which could have a short-term negative impact on ROI.

• Simple to install Redwood Workload Automation agent servers on every server side and trigger the necessary jobs in keeping with business needs.
• Allows for the interdependent scheduling of groups of Windows scripts and shell scripts.
• Many problems have been fixed, such as the ability to gather data on the number of activities that are executed each day, receive email notifications when a job expires, and connect system agents to monitors.
• capable of adhering to SLAs for complicated order flows

Incentivized