Redbot Security vs. Veracode
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Redbot Security | N/A | N/A | Redbot Security, headquartered in Denver, identifies, evaluates, exploits, reports (proof of concept) and provides best practice remediation steps for Real-World vulnerabilities found-within applications, systems and networks. They offer Manual Controlled Penetration Testing (MCPT-TM) Real world manual hacking tactics & techniques performed by Sr. Level Engineers /Ethical Hackers from a controlled environment. | N/A |
Veracode | Score8.7 out of 10 | Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees) | Veracode provides advanced application security solutions, trusted by enterprises to develop and maintain secure software. Its platform identifies exploitable risks, speeds up vulnerability remediation, and reduces security debt at scale using a proprietary AI-assisted remediation engine. | N/A |
| Redbot Security | Veracode | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | Developer pricing options available | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Redbot Security | Veracode | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
No answers on this topic | 92% Would buy again 121 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
No answers on this topic | 96% Delivers good value for the price 85 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
No answers on this topic | 95% Happy with the feature set 125 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | 95% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 72 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
No answers on this topic | 86% Implementation went as expected 95 Answers | |
| Redbot Security | Veracode | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | - | 8.6 |
| Likelihood to Renew | - | 9.0 |
| Usability | - | 7.3 |
| Availability | - | 9.1 |
| Performance | - | 6.4 |
| Support Rating | - | 9.0 |
| Implementation Rating | - | 9.1 |
| Configurability | - | 6.4 |
| Ease of integration | - | 5.5 |
| Product Scalability | - | 7.3 |
| Vendor post-sale | - | 8.9 |
| Vendor pre-sale | - | 8.2 |
| Redbot Security | Veracode | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | No answers on this topic |
|
| Pros | No answers on this topic |
|
| Cons | No answers on this topic |
|
| Likelihood to Renew | No answers on this topic |
|
| Usability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Reliability and Availability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Performance | No answers on this topic |
|
| Support Rating | No answers on this topic |
|
| Implementation Rating | No answers on this topic |
|
| Alternatives Considered | No answers on this topic |
|
| Scalability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Return on Investment | No answers on this topic |
|
| ScreenShots | Veracode Screenshots |





