TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Red Hat Virtualization (RHV)

    Score6.1 out of 10
    N/ARed Hat Virtualization (formerly Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization, broadly known as RHEV) is an enterprise level server and desktop virtualization solution. Red Hat Virtualization also contains the functionality of Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization for Desktop in later editions of the platform.

    $999

    Per Year Per Hypervisor

    VMware ESXi

    Score7.6 out of 10
    N/AA bare-metal hypervisor that installs directly onto a physical server. With direct access to and control of underlying resources, VMware ESXi partitions hardware to consolidate applications and cut costs.N/A
    Pricing
    Red Hat Virtualization (RHV)VMware ESXi
    Editions & Modules
    Standard
    $999.00
    Per Year Per Hypervisor
    Premium
    $1,499.00
    Per Year Per Hypervisor
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Red Hat Virtualization (RHV)VMware ESXi
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoYes
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Red Hat Virtualization (RHV)VMware ESXi
    Considered Both Products
    Red Hat
    Chose Red Hat Virtualization (RHV)
    VMware ESXi is a more mature technology, as it has been around for a longer period of time. However, automating ESXi installations requires hacking OEM media and an intense amount of knowledge of how ESXi operates under the hood. The WebUI and associated functionality for ESXi …
    Incentivized
    Chose Red Hat Virtualization (RHV)
    RHV has the following advantages:
    • They have relatively cheaper subscriptions compared to others.
    • With the future going to Openstack and containerization migrating to KVM-based virtualization will be easier to migrate to future products.
    Incentivized
    Chose Red Hat Virtualization (RHV)
    Pretty much Open Source sums it up.
    Incentivized
    Chose Red Hat Virtualization (RHV)
    RHEV is more stable than oVirt but less capability. Much easier to automate than esx
    Incentivized
    VMware by Broadcom
    Chose VMware ESXi
    VMware ESXI is straight forward dependable hypervisor, with some users experience consistent server uptime even during hardware failure and other setbacks. It requires few hardware resources, making a minimal impact on its host machine. Deploying new servers with VMware ESXI is …
    Incentivized
    Chose VMware ESXi
    I have worked with several other virtual machine platforms such as Microsoft Hyper-V and Oracle VM VirtualBox and find not only the ESXi is a better platform for us, ESXi also seems to be easier once you have learned the basics.
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    98%
    Would buy again
    92 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    97%
    Delivers good value for the price
    85 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    99%
    Happy with the feature set
    93 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    99%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    81 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    90 Answers
    TrustRadius Insights
    Red Hat Virtualization (RHV)VMware ESXi
    Highlights

    TrustRadius
    Research Team Insight
    Published

    Red Hat Virtualization and VMware ESXi are server virtualization solutions. VMware ESXi is a proprietary bare-metal hypervisor bundled with VMware’s vSphere product. Red Hat Virtualization is an open-source, Linux-based platform that includes hypervisors and a virtualization manager. Both products are most heavily used by mid-size and enterprise-level organizations, likely because both are primarily designed for and marketed to businesses with large-scale virtualization needs.

    Features

    Although both VMware ESXi and Red Hat Virtualization provide similar virtualized server benefits, they differ in their usage and structure.

    The prevailing opinion of VMware ESXi is that it’s a straightforward, dependable hypervisor, with some users experiencing years of consistent server uptime even during hardware failures and other setbacks. It requires relatively few hardware resources, making a minimal impact on its host machine. Deploying new servers with VMware ESXi is quick and simple, even when you need to configure the server from scratch. When it’s time to upgrade hardware, VMware’s detailed hardware compatibility guidelines help IT departments make the right selection.

    Red Hat Virtualization is designed for smooth implementation, even if you’re replacing an existing virtualization solution. Red Hat Virtualization offers pre-built scripts and professional assistance to help new customers have a smooth migration experience. Their professional customer support extends beyond migration, and many customers specifically report a good experience with Red Hat Virtualization’s support team. For an enterprise-level product, Red Hat Virtualization still has a relatively low price point compared to proprietary competitors like VMware. It’s also Linux-based and open-source, two appealing qualities for many IT professionals.

    Limitations

    Before you purchase either solution, though, it’s important to consider the drawbacks of each product. Neither Red Hat Virtualization or VMware ESXi are free from complaints.

    VMware ESXi isn’t a complete solution on its own; it’s best used as the foundation of a full virtualization stack. Licensing for VMware ESXi and other supporting VMware products can get expensive fast, especially when you need higher subscription tiers for the features you want. Its web-based management client is a frequent pain point, with some users reporting that it’s not compatible with their browser. And while VMware’s hardware compatibility guidelines are comprehensive, that’s by necessity: VMware ESXi can be very picky about the hardware it will run on. If your existing hardware doesn’t fit the requirements, getting the compatible products could inflate your virtualization expenses.

    Red Hat Virtualization offers a client-based UI as opposed to a browser-based interface, but many users complain that the UI is outdated and clunky to use. The migration scripts provided by the company might not be plug-and-play for all users, hanging up on unexpected problems such as unusual disk naming conventions. Red Hat Virtualization doesn’t offer live-patching options and requires a reboot to implement upgrades. The resulting downtime can be frustrating for IT administrators and end users alike.

    Pricing

    VMware ESXi is available as part of VMware’s vSphere product, which has a free vSphere Hypervisor edition limited to a single physical server. vSphere has multiple packages, tiers, and subscription levels with differing capabilities, ranging from $510 to over $20,000. For full pricing information, refer to the vSphere pricing page.

    Pricing information for Red Hat Virtualization is available from Red Hat or a Red Hat sales partner.

    Features
    Red Hat Virtualization (RHV)VMware ESXi
    Server Virtualization
    Comparison of Server Virtualization features of Red Hat Virtualization and VMware ESXi
    Feature
    Red Hat Virtualization
    7.7
    10 Ratings
    6% below category average
    VMware ESXi
    8.2
    128 Ratings
    1% above category average
    Virtual machine automated provisioning7.910 Ratings8.0116 Ratings
    Management console7.310 Ratings9.0128 Ratings
    Live virtual machine backup7.29 Ratings8.0112 Ratings
    Live virtual machine migration6.910 Ratings8.0116 Ratings
    Hypervisor-level security8.99 Ratings8.0117 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    Red Hat Virtualization (RHV)VMware ESXi
    Small Businesses
    Proxmox VE
    Score9 out of 10
    Proxmox VE
    Score9 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    VMware vSOM (discontinued)
    Score10 out of 10
    VMware vSOM (discontinued)
    Score10 out of 10
    Enterprises
    VMware Workstation Pro
    Score8.2 out of 10
    VMware Workstation Pro
    Score8.2 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Red Hat Virtualization (RHV)VMware ESXi
    Likelihood to Recommend
    6.6
    (11 ratings)
    9.0
    (129 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (6 ratings)
    Usability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (6 ratings)
    Availability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (2 ratings)
    Performance
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (2 ratings)
    Support Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (55 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (3 ratings)
    Configurability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (2 ratings)
    Contract Terms and Pricing Model
    -
    (0 ratings)
    5.1
    (2 ratings)
    Ease of integration
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (2 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (2 ratings)
    Vendor post-sale
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (2 ratings)
    Vendor pre-sale
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (2 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Red Hat Virtualization (RHV)VMware ESXi
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Red Hat
    RHEV is well suited for organizations that need a cost-effective and flexible solution for their environment. As its vendor-independent software, easily install on any type of hardware. RHEV provides a GUI interface to manage the software, which makes the management of the software easier for the end-user. RHEV is best for non-production or less critical applications. RHEV can be easily integrated with other REDHAT software.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    VMware by Broadcom
    If you're looking for the industry standard in server virtualization, I would recommend ESXi. After decades of expertise in the field, VMware continues to provide a strong product, production-ready, with an easy-to-learn interface that allows for quick management along with less costly upfront onboarding and training. Grab the free personal-use license and install in your homelab to start!
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Red Hat
    • RHV issues/bugs can be reported via Bugzilla to RH support. The service is great and typically responds soon.
    • Red Hat distribution integration is seamless as it is integrated into the kernel.
    • OpenStack support enables more customized VM templates and network configuration control.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    VMware by Broadcom
    • Resource management. The automatic load balancing works very well to ensure no host is taxed disproportionately compared to the others.
    • Templates and cloning. It is very easy to set up a template and spin up new servers based on a specific setup. This makes server management very streamlined.
    • VM management. The vSphere interface is very easy to use and navigate. Everything is responsive and it works when you need it to. The options are also robust while also being arranged in a straightforward manner.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Red Hat
    • 1- RHVM API is pretty slow, especially after creating a VM it is not possible to retrieve the VM details (i.e VM's MAC Address) fast enough, where we need to place a pause in our Ansible Playbook, make the automation process slow.
    • 2- RHV is still using collected to monitor the hypervisors which is deviating from Red Hat policy for other RHEL based applications to use PCP to monitor, which is richer in features.
    • 3- It will be great if it is possible to patch the hypervisors using other tools such as satellite and not only via RHVM.
    • 4- In the past Red Hat used to present patches in the z release (i.e. 4.3.z), and features in the y release (i.e 4. y), but starting from 4.4 that is mixed together wherein the Z release you get both patches and features, that is not good because that requires a lot of time to test when we patch as it includes features as well.
    • 5- Engineering team has to be more reactive when new feature is requested.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    VMware by Broadcom
    • VMware ESXi can improve on the UI that is installed on the bare metal machine. The menus can be hard to navigate when looking for simple configuration items.
    • VMware ESXi can improve on the stability of their overall hypervisor. There have been a few times we had to reinstall due to corruption of VMware ESXi.
    • I would like to see VMware ESXi do better at adding more standard free features in their consumer version of VMware ESXi. For example, having the ability to back up virtual machines is good practice and something that would be very nice if offered in their free version.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Red Hat
    No answers on this topic
    VMware by Broadcom
    It is critical to our business, what started out as a way to do certain functions, it has now become core to ensuring our product is available to our customers and reducing our costs to operate and reduce our recovery time and provisioning servers. Their support is great and the costs to renew is reasonable.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Red Hat
    No answers on this topic
    VMware by Broadcom
    The interface is fairly intuitive for most things, and the areas that are a little less obvious usually have fantastic documentation in the online knowledgebase. In 3-4 years of managing our ESXi hosts, I think that I have only opened 4-5 support cases for things that I could not figure out myself or find answers to on the website.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Reliability and Availability
    Red Hat
    No answers on this topic
    VMware by Broadcom
    Without the need to patch the servers with bug fixes and enhancements we whave not experienced any downtime with VMware issues. Even the bug fixes and updates do not cause of downtime as we just migrate the servers to the opposite node and update the one and then move servers back. Very simple and painless.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Performance
    Red Hat
    No answers on this topic
    VMware by Broadcom
    We do not notice any difference between a physical and virtual server running the same workload. In fact we can scale quicker with the virtual server than we can with the physical.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Red Hat
    No answers on this topic
    VMware by Broadcom
    I can't say enough good about VMware's support team. To an individual they take ownership of the case, provide thorough answers, and follow up regularly. On one occasion, a problem we experienced with NSX Endpoint was escalated to development for a permanent resolution after a workaround was found. In my experience, most companies would have tried to find a way to close a case like that instead of taking it all the way. Most importantly, when production is down and every second counts, they VMware teams understand that urgency and treat your issue as if it were the only one they had to deal with. You can't ask for better.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Implementation Rating
    Red Hat
    No answers on this topic
    VMware by Broadcom
    Jsut read and follow anything your storage provider may require to allow the integration of VMware with storage operations, outside of that VMware jsut works.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Red Hat
    RHEV is an excellent product, includes more features, is less expensive, and has rock solid reliability and is backed with the best Red Hat Support in the industry. RHEV uses KVM under the hood which is used by all the big players in the industry (AWS, Rackspace, etc) to lower their overall costs and improve efficiency and profits and that's why RHEV is an excellent solution!
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    VMware by Broadcom
    As long as you're using Nutanix AOS on Nutanix hardware and are paying their software support fees, AOS is a valid competitor to VMware and can save money due to not needing a license and having their server management system built into the base host management system. If you aren't using Nutanix hardware, however, VMWare is in most cases the best way to go. I cannot comment on HyperV, but most IT people I know either use it because they have to (most) or they like it better (not many).
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Contract Terms and Pricing Model
    Red Hat
    No answers on this topic
    VMware by Broadcom
    it has been fair and easy to understand. I know VMware is looking at wanting to change from CPU to core pricing so we will see what that looks like when it happens.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Scalability
    Red Hat
    No answers on this topic
    VMware by Broadcom
    We started out with a two-server cluster and adding a third or fourth is very straightforward and simple with no issues. You just need to be aware of the size of your Vcenter Server to handle the workload, but still the resources needed is very minimal
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Red Hat
    • RHEV has provided a positive ROI as our customers are not experiencing as many outages during maintenances.
    • We have not experienced any catastrophic failures as a result of vsphere losing connection to the ntp.
    • There has been a level of stability in our environment that was not previously experienced with our previous vendor.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    VMware by Broadcom
    • VMWare ESXi licensing is affordable for our business - and the licensing model is simplistic. Not like that of Microsoft with having to keep track of server licenses and CAL licenses for users.
    • VMWare ESXi also has hardware-monitoring built-in, so that further saves us money from having to be spent with another vendor.
    • As much as I hate the saying "a single pane of glass" does fit for this product. You can manage your servers, monitor hardware status, create and export backup snapshots, manage virtual NICs, connect to various storage devices. We're very happy with this product.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots