Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform vs. TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Grid

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Red Hat JBoss EAP
Score 7.4 out of 10
N/A
N/AN/A
TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Grid
Score 7.0 out of 10
N/A
ActiveMatrix Service Grid is an SOA governance and application server, from TIBCO.N/A
Pricing
Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application PlatformTIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Grid
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Red Hat JBoss EAPTIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Grid
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application PlatformTIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Grid
Features
Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application PlatformTIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Grid
Application Servers
Comparison of Application Servers features of Product A and Product B
Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform
8.6
Ratings
8% above category average
TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Grid
-
Ratings
IDE support8.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Security management8.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Administration and management8.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Application server performance8.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Installation9.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Open-source standards compliance8.60 Ratings00 Ratings
SOA Governance
Comparison of SOA Governance features of Product A and Product B
Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform
-
Ratings
TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Grid
5.8
Ratings
14% below category average
Service registry00 Ratings5.00 Ratings
Service management00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Service discovery00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Dependency management00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Policy management00 Ratings4.00 Ratings
User Ratings
Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application PlatformTIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Grid
Likelihood to Recommend
8.1
(0 ratings)
7.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
5.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.5
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
8.7
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
5.2
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
8.5
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application PlatformTIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Grid
Likelihood to Recommend
Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (JBoss EAP) is well suited for deploying high transaction Java EE based applications. It supports many popular Java EE web-based frameworks such as Spring, Angular JS, jQuery Mobile, and Google Web Toolkit.
Read full review
It fits perfectly for SOA and EAI architecture with large numbers of services that required to be wired to each other, the binding virtualization is quite good to simply this part. For the simple scenario of orchestration and /or ESB architecture could be a better use traditional stack.
Read full review
Pros
  • MOD_CLUSTER integration. JBoss EAP integrates pretty well with mod_cluster. This is an intelligent load balancer especially useful in highly clustered environments.
  • Supports enterprise-grade features such as high availability clustering, distributed caching, messaging etc.
  • Supports deployment in on-premise, virtual and hybrid cloud environments.
Read full review
  • reduce the number of http port required by services
  • simplified the binding connection amongst services
  • high scalability and fast deployment of applications
Read full review
Cons
  • Jboss CLI is a great tool but we had trouble using it to get values that are displayed on Jboss GUI. It also has limitations parsing the applications.xml files and we had to use a mix of jboss-cli and linux bash commands to automate certain application administrative tasks.
  • JBoss doesn't really provides performance tuning recommendations. It would have been nice if it could learn from the current demand vs current settings for things like connection pool, server configurations, garbage collection etc.
Read full review
  • health check of services and application features has been released with a lot of bugs that have never been fixed
  • it is not so simple to apply the security policy to service/reference binding
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
We are planning to migrate away from Jboss to Tomcat as Jboss has shown not interest in supporting OSGi which is heavily used at our shop
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
JBoss overall is easy to use. The installation and deployment of applications are quick. Documentations and support are also readily available.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Performance
We run a high traffic B2B application on JBoss and it is very stable. Boot time when restarting services is also fast
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Fast response.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
WebSphere Application Server is propriety and increases project cost. It is slightly complicated to learn when compared to Jboss EAP. These were the two main reasons why we chose Red Hat JBoss EAP over WebSphere Application Server. Also, JBoss EAP is light weight and requires less server resource
Read full review
TIBCO service grid has been chosen as a natural selection of the TIBCO product evolution. The high flexibility and the binding virtualization fits very well with client needs for its EAI applications due to the huge number of services and applications, the management of application dependencies during deployment, the advantage of perfect integration with EMS for logging
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Jboss EAP is easy to deploy and configure. This lead to lower cost and faster delivery.
  • Even though we have large number of machines running JBoss, we have only two Jboss Administrators. It doesn't requires too much administration and maintenance on daily basis and reduces number of administrators required for large implementations.
Read full review
  • The integration of old BW with BWSE and its interface quite similar to design time has reduced the cost of training for developers
  • The TIBCO support for this product is no the best and clients complains too much about this. This required to find a workaround or force the client to move to new/or different product. Huge impact on ROI
Read full review
ScreenShots