Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform vs. Red Hat Quay

Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform

Red Hat Quay

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
Red Hat JBoss EAP	Score 7.3 out of 10	N/A	N/A	N/A
Red Hat Quay	Score 10.0 out of 10	N/A	The Red Hat Quay container registry platform provides storage, distribution, and governance of containers and cloud-native artifacts on any infrastructure. It is available as a standalone component or running on top of Red Hat OpenShift.	N/A

Pricing

Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform

Red Hat Quay

Editions & Modules

No answers on this topic

Offerings

Pricing Offerings
Red Hat JBoss EAP	Red Hat Quay
Free Trial
No	Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No	No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No	No

Entry-level Setup Fee

No setup fee

Additional Details

—

More Pricing Information

Community Pulse
	Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform	Red Hat Quay

Features

Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform

Red Hat Quay

Application Servers

Comparison of Application Servers features of Product A and Product B
	Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 8.6 Ratings 8% above category average	Red Hat Quay - Ratings
IDE support	8.10 Ratings	00 Ratings
Security management	8.60 Ratings	00 Ratings
Administration and management	8.10 Ratings	00 Ratings
Application server performance	8.60 Ratings	00 Ratings
Installation	9.50 Ratings	00 Ratings
Open-source standards compliance	8.60 Ratings	00 Ratings

Best Alternatives
	Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform	Red Hat Quay
Small Businesses	NGINX Score 9.2 out of 10	Portainer Score 9.6 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies	NGINX Score 9.2 out of 10	Red Hat OpenShift Score 9.3 out of 10
Enterprises	NGINX Score 9.2 out of 10	Red Hat OpenShift Score 9.3 out of 10
All Alternatives	View all alternatives	View all alternatives

User Ratings
	Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform	Red Hat Quay
Likelihood to Recommend	8.1 (0 ratings)	- (0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew	5.0 (0 ratings)	- (0 ratings)
Usability	8.5 (0 ratings)	- (0 ratings)
Performance	8.7 (0 ratings)	- (0 ratings)
Support Rating	5.2 (0 ratings)	- (0 ratings)
Ease of integration	8.5 (0 ratings)	- (0 ratings)

User Testimonials
	Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform	Red Hat Quay
Likelihood to Recommend	Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (JBoss EAP) is well suited for deploying high transaction Java EE based applications. It supports many popular Java EE web-based frameworks such as Spring, Angular JS, jQuery Mobile, and Google Web Toolkit. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	No answers on this topic
Pros	MOD_CLUSTER integration. JBoss EAP integrates pretty well with mod_cluster. This is an intelligent load balancer especially useful in highly clustered environments. Supports enterprise-grade features such as high availability clustering, distributed caching, messaging etc. Supports deployment in on-premise, virtual and hybrid cloud environments. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	No answers on this topic
Cons	Jboss CLI is a great tool but we had trouble using it to get values that are displayed on Jboss GUI. It also has limitations parsing the applications.xml files and we had to use a mix of jboss-cli and linux bash commands to automate certain application administrative tasks. JBoss doesn't really provides performance tuning recommendations. It would have been nice if it could learn from the current demand vs current settings for things like connection pool, server configurations, garbage collection etc. Incentivized Amanda Decker Development Coordinator, Advancement Services Read full review	No answers on this topic
Likelihood to Renew	We are planning to migrate away from Jboss to Tomcat as Jboss has shown not interest in supporting OSGi which is heavily used at our shop Incentivized sameer vaidya Software Developer IV Read full review	No answers on this topic
Usability	JBoss overall is easy to use. The installation and deployment of applications are quick. Documentations and support are also readily available. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	No answers on this topic
Performance	We run a high traffic B2B application on JBoss and it is very stable. Boot time when restarting services is also fast Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	No answers on this topic
Support Rating	Fast response. Incentivized Holman Cárdenas, M.Eng, TOGAF®, ITIL® CIO (Chief Information Officer) Read full review	No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered	WebSphere Application Server is propriety and increases project cost. It is slightly complicated to learn when compared to Jboss EAP. These were the two main reasons why we chose Red Hat JBoss EAP over WebSphere Application Server. Also, JBoss EAP is light weight and requires less server resource Incentivized Amanda Decker Development Coordinator, Advancement Services Read full review	No answers on this topic
Return on Investment	Jboss EAP is easy to deploy and configure. This lead to lower cost and faster delivery. Even though we have large number of machines running JBoss, we have only two Jboss Administrators. It doesn't requires too much administration and maintenance on daily basis and reduces number of administrators required for large implementations. Incentivized Amanda Decker Development Coordinator, Advancement Services Read full review	No answers on this topic
ScreenShots