Recorded Future Intelligence Cloud vs. Webroot Endpoint Protection

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Recorded Future Intelligence Cloud
Score 9.7 out of 10
N/A
Recorded Future is an intelligence company. Its Intelligence Cloud provides coverage across adversaries, infrastructure, and targets. Combining persistent and pervasive automated data collection and analytics with human analysis, Recorded Future provides visibility into the digital landscape, enabling countries and organizations to take proactive action to disrupt adversaries.N/A
Webroot Endpoint Protection
Score 8.1 out of 10
N/A
Webroot Endpoint Protection is the OpenText company's business class multi-vector endpoint protection application, providing centralized endpoint management, deep learning intelligence, and advanced behavioral analytics.
$150
per year per 5 seats
Pricing
Recorded Future Intelligence CloudWebroot Endpoint Protection
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Business Endpoint Protection
$150.00
per year per 5 seats
Business Endpoint Protection
$690.00
per year per 25 seats
Business Endpoint Protection
Contact sales team
per 50+ seats
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Recorded Future Intelligence CloudWebroot Endpoint Protection
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Recorded Future Intelligence CloudWebroot Endpoint Protection
Features
Recorded Future Intelligence CloudWebroot Endpoint Protection
Threat Intelligence
Comparison of Threat Intelligence features of Product A and Product B
Recorded Future Intelligence Cloud
6.7
Ratings
11% below category average
Webroot Endpoint Protection
-
Ratings
Network Analytics5.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Threat Recognition6.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Vulnerability Classification6.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Automated Alerts and Reporting8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Threat Analysis7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Threat Intelligence Reporting8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Automated Threat Identification7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Endpoint Security
Comparison of Endpoint Security features of Product A and Product B
Recorded Future Intelligence Cloud
-
Ratings
Webroot Endpoint Protection
7.6
Ratings
12% below category average
Anti-Exploit Technology00 Ratings8.80 Ratings
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Centralized Management00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Hybrid Deployment Support00 Ratings7.10 Ratings
Infection Remediation00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Vulnerability Management00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Malware Detection00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Recorded Future Intelligence CloudWebroot Endpoint Protection
Small Businesses
Egnyte
Egnyte
Score 9.6 out of 10
ThreatLocker
ThreatLocker
Score 9.5 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
CrowdStrike Falcon
CrowdStrike Falcon
Score 9.1 out of 10
BlackBerry Protect (CylancePROTECT)
BlackBerry Protect (CylancePROTECT)
Score 9.1 out of 10
Enterprises
CrowdStrike Falcon
CrowdStrike Falcon
Score 9.1 out of 10
BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management
BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management
Score 9.8 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Recorded Future Intelligence CloudWebroot Endpoint Protection
Likelihood to Recommend
6.0
(0 ratings)
7.5
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
10.0
(0 ratings)
9.5
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
7.8
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Recorded Future Intelligence CloudWebroot Endpoint Protection
Likelihood to Recommend
Recorded Future is mainly beneficial to the SOC. As part of the Monitoring team, Recorded Future makes the investigation of the alarms a lot easier for me. It can show the reputation of the IP/domain or even hashes which helps me redirect my focus to potentially malicious network activities.
Read full review
The software tends to do a good job of basic protection but is not the best for larger clients and is not as powerful as some others offered on the market today. The support is not the best either, have had a hard time getting assistance in the past trying to resolve issues.
Read full review
Pros
  • Searching across multiple sources at the same time
  • Indexing information in real time
  • Dashboards, statistics and heatmaps about a certain topic
Read full review
  • Webroot Endpoint Protection works very well at blocking threats quickly and can undo changes if a file turns out to be harmful, which has helped us in the past.
  • It runs quietly in the background without slowing down endpoints, even during scans, which is great.
  • You can manage all your devices from one online dashboard, making it easy to set rules and see security alerts. One pane of glass is always great.
Read full review
Cons
  • For the Browser extension, since the main purpose is to present information with regards to the IP, I think it's best to give us an idea of where the IP originated/some additional information about the organization it belongs to.
Read full review
  • It was missing detections. We found a better product that detects more malware.
  • Deploying the endpoint agents was easy, but deploying Web Threat Shield was not and users could disable that functionality.
  • When you deactivated old endpoints, they were put in an "inactive" category. You could not then delete the "inactive" endpoints. For someone who likes to keep things clean, this was annoying.
  • I found the rollout of endpoint agent updates to be rather slow.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
No answers on this topic
It has proven successful so far in our environment for controlling malware/virus outbreaks.
Read full review
Usability
No answers on this topic
It does what it needs to do but we have noticed that malware is sort of uncommon and we have started to switch to other solutions of combating malware and suspicious activity such as using products like ThreatLocker and Field Effect, combined with things like malware bytes to perform scans when needed.
Read full review
Support Rating
I've had an issue with their browser-plugin which didn't want to authenticate correctly. RF's support could arrange for a session with me and identify and solve the issue. I was very pleased how serious they took my problems and also how knowledgeable they are.
If I have more general questions they quickly reply and most likely also have a solution at hand.
Read full review
Support has been reliable up to this point. A request can easily be generated via the console and support responding in a reasonable time. We have not had any major issues other than the basic agents not communicating with the console and the like.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
No answers on this topic
I had some difficulties with remote users. I ended up needing to open a remote tech support session and finish the process. Other than a few speed bumps, I was impressed with the engineering of the install. Because of time differences, I was done installing in two days. The cost, per license, could be less.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
It is the most complete solution of these three, as the others are focused in specific areas and having really detailed analysis about threat actors, APT groups, etc. Recorded Future is not having this level of knowledge in really specific areas but doing a really good work covering thousands of sources and the most relevant forums.
Read full review
We would consider Webroot in the top 5 when you factor in ease of use, level of protection, and cost. Probably not as comprehensive as other end-point security solutions but the proper level of functionality and support for our needs. Question what impact the acquisition by OpenText is having on future development and support. OpenText also acquire Carbonite for back-up support.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • We've been able to identify leaked credentials and close those accounts off.
  • We've also been able to identify malware being distributed or spam being sent out by customers using our infrastructure. Again we could shut off those accounts.
  • Their domain-monitoring allows us to identify typo-squats and issue domain-takedowns for those (or at least add them to our monitoring / detection)
Read full review
  • It saves us time and money in the fact that it runs and we never really have to worry about that part of IT. IT just runs
  • Being able to centrally manage the clients is another plus because of being able to reach it virtually anywhere.
  • Very simple quick installs. Gives us time to do other things.
Read full review
ScreenShots