Rapid7 InsightConnect vs. Rapid7 InsightVM

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Rapid7 InsightConnect
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
Rapid7 offers InsightConnect, a SOAR solution that integrates with existing solutions to orchestrate vulnerability management processes from notification to remediation, so users can ensure critical issues are being addressed with every security advisory that comes in—while leaving human decision points where most critical. Automate actions to scan, find patches, and verify remediation.N/A
Rapid7 InsightVM
Score 8.9 out of 10
N/A
InsightVM is presented as the next evolution of Nexpose, by Rapid7. This Insight cloud-based solution features everything included in Nexpose, such as Adaptive Security and the proprietary Real Risk score, and extends visibility into cloud and containerized infrastructure. InsightVM also offers advanced remediation, tracking, and reporting capabilities not included in Nexpose.
$19
per GB
Pricing
Rapid7 InsightConnectRapid7 InsightVM
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Log Management
$19
per GB
Vulnerability Management
$22
per asset
insightIDR
$52
per asset
Application Security
$2,000
per app
insignConnect
Contact sales team
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Rapid7 InsightConnectRapid7 InsightVM
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Rapid7 InsightConnectRapid7 InsightVM
Features
Rapid7 InsightConnectRapid7 InsightVM
Threat Intelligence
Comparison of Threat Intelligence features of Product A and Product B
Rapid7 InsightConnect
-
Ratings
Rapid7 InsightVM
7.4
Ratings
7% below category average
Network Analytics00 Ratings5.30 Ratings
Threat Recognition00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Vulnerability Classification00 Ratings9.30 Ratings
Automated Alerts and Reporting00 Ratings9.30 Ratings
Threat Analysis00 Ratings7.40 Ratings
Threat Intelligence Reporting00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Automated Threat Identification00 Ratings6.70 Ratings
Vulnerability Management Tools
Comparison of Vulnerability Management Tools features of Product A and Product B
Rapid7 InsightConnect
-
Ratings
Rapid7 InsightVM
8.3
Ratings
3% above category average
IT Asset Realization00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Authentication00 Ratings8.60 Ratings
Configuration Monitoring00 Ratings8.60 Ratings
Web Scanning00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Vulnerability Intelligence00 Ratings8.30 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Rapid7 InsightConnectRapid7 InsightVM
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

Action1
Action1
Score 9.5 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Splunk SOAR
Splunk SOAR
Score 9.0 out of 10
Action1
Action1
Score 9.5 out of 10
Enterprises
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR
Score 7.1 out of 10
CrowdStrike Falcon
CrowdStrike Falcon
Score 9.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Rapid7 InsightConnectRapid7 InsightVM
Likelihood to Recommend
7.9
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
9.0
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
7.2
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Rapid7 InsightConnectRapid7 InsightVM
Likelihood to Recommend
This is perfect for an IT department with minimal staff. Security is usually an afterthought in small IT departments. If you have a dedicated security team, then something like this could be replaced with something more complex. The features it comes with are aimed toward a team that doesn't monitor and change things all the time. It's more of a set it and let it handle the rest type.
Read full review
I think Rapid7 InsightVM is well suited for large enterprise customers with a lot of assets. It integrates well with a number of different ITSM solutions which I think is very good. There are not many CIS benchmarking tools on the market and Rapid7 InsightVM does a very good job at benchmarking. I think where Rapid7 InsightVM falls down a little is on false positive vulnerabilities. Sometime you there a few positive results on vulnerabily discovery. Tuning the settings for scan engines can sometimes be trick as well.
Read full review
Pros
  • Offers pre-built integrations with multiple common alerting tools
  • Offers pre-built workflows for multiple common tools
  • Easy to create custom workflows and integrations
Read full review
  • The API is also a great tool for us to automate lots of routine procedures like scan and report of asset(s) BY EMAIL.
  • Tagging. It helps sort out results and reports for respective assets Owner for remediation without a lengthy report including unnecessary information for that particular team.
  • SQL Reporting. It provides advanced reporting and export capabilities that you can not find in the stock report template.
Read full review
Cons
  • It would be great if Rapid7 InsightConnect could be configured based on pre determined specifications when installing the agent.
  • We've noticed that at times, there are certain network parameters needed in order for Rapid7 to collect and report data efficiently.
  • Sometimes there are issues with the discovery scan in Rapid7 making it hard to configure in the beginning.
Read full review
  • Devices found and scanned are never removed. Removal must be done manually with no option for automation.
  • The database can be fragile. Ours quietly corrupted and progressively degraded until we had to restore and lose 6 months of data. Still didn't fix it and had to be rebuilt again losing all data.
  • Workflow for delegating remediation is supposed to be helpful, but can also become cumbersome.
  • Scheduling can become a nightmare if not monitored closely. We found jobs had failed to run because the server had gone offline. When the server came online, it did not try to run missed jobs. Running missed jobs all at once can overload the server, but searching for and launching a large number of missed jobs manually is a pain.
Read full review
Usability
It's incredibly easy to set up, to use, to detect threats. It's easy to change, tweek and very quick to resolve all issues
Read full review
While I think it is a great tool and platform, I believe it (like all tools and solutions) is always evolving and the needs for clients are changing as the industry evolves and threats are upgraded. Cost is good, and support is helpful. Some things could be more granular and others could be easier to understand
Read full review
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
I gave it a seven due to the functionality and general ease of use after the initial setup headaches, but compared to Qualys, Rapid7 Nexpose falls short on features and ease of use. Their support drags this rating down a point as well. I have gone weeks with no update on semi-critical issues and typically have to make call after call to get a semi-coherent response.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
In our opinion, Rapid7 InsightConnect was a better choice for our environment as we were able to roll it out efficiently. Also the monitoring tools and reporting were easier to use and read. CrowdStrike appeared to be harder to install from a client standpoint and also we felt that Rapid7 fit our budget a bit better for the value we getting.
Read full review
I think Tenable is very comparable and they are both leaders in this space. I evaluated both of them side-by-side and ultimately decided to go with Rapid7. Tenable did have a slight edge on the amount of information I was getting from the machines, but I landed on R7 because I found the features of the InsightVM tool to be more useful. They both get the job done, but I found InsightVM a better experience to use on a day-to-day basis and had better quality of life features that I was looking for.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Scans for newer vulnerabilities require additional support due to the increased risk posed by long dwell times.
  • Violations stopped at 4% per month and growing.
  • Compatibility with networks that may improve in the future.
Read full review
  • It certainly has a more positive impact than negative impact while performing the scans. Nexpose can find report vulnerabilities that our other scanner fails to identify during the scan because of its defined scan templates.
  • Also, even if the scan is not being performed due to some issues like reachability, whitelisting, etc. it will try to give scan results unlike QualysGuard which just marks the asset as unreachable.
Read full review
ScreenShots