R1Soft Server Back Manager (SBM) vs. Veeam Agent for Microsoft Windows

We use it as a Simple Deployment. As a simple deployment scenario, the roles of the backup server, VMware backup proxy, and backup repository are assigned to a single machine. These roles are assigned automatically to the machine where we installed Veeam Backup & Replication. The drawback of the simple deployment scenario is that only the backup server handles and stores all data which is a single point of failure.

Incentivized

• File level restore
• Backing up of difficult Laptops that are in and off the network
• Reporting
• Integration into other Veeam Products

Incentivized

• Stop the backup job from the console instead of having to stop from the client.
• Don't consume too many resources while taking a backup.

Incentivized

Overall, Veeam Agent for Microsoft Windows is a great backup solution and supplies extremely useful tools to configure backups to suite our needs and our clients requirements. I have only taken some points off as the user interface could be easier to navigate when configuring backups and the ability to update Veeam Agent for Microsoft Windows from within the software would be appreciated.

Incentivized

Veeam is just on another level compared to most other software vendors who tend to make backup solutions complicated. Veeam uses intuitive GUI's that make sense to most people and take the stress out of systems recovery at high and low levels by simply explaining the process step by step.

Incentivized

• It allows end users to easily self-serve their own file restores, freeing up IT resources
• It provides a seamless DR solution for the resources it backs up
• It frequently take a long time to resolve problems when they do occur

Incentivized